Sean Mooney

RLLD really isn't worth the time. He can't see simple truths plastered right in front of him and he thinks if he writes a lot of words about them he will never have to confront them.

2015-2016 there were a ton of things written about how "The Republicans might struggle to win another election again because of shifting demographics amid a post Obama Presidency. Obviously those articles were idiotically premature. Right now there are a bunch of articles the other way because the Republicans just cleaned up in November and the Democrats don't seemingly have a unified plan going forward yet. Of course they will figure out some plan, they will rally behind that, and rally behind whoever leads the party. The other issue right now is that Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi are the most notable faces in the party and they are both old, out of touch, dopes who need to be sent to the political glue factory. But of course RLLD has to start a thread saying "Democrats assert whoever doesn't share their beliefs are evil." When presented with the idea that it isn't solely a one sided issue on insisting the other side is evil he bloviates nonsensically. When pointed out to him the President does the exact thing he is saying he tries to deflect. When he is asked to use the search function here that is too hard for him. Dude is tonally unaware.

Because you missed this sentence- I will say it again: And I'm not saying Democrats don't throw stupid terms at Republicans- just saying it is insane to pretend like Republicans don't do the same.

Yeah, but other than the President...nobody in the Republican party is calling the Democrats "evil". I'm sure RLLD will tell you it's all made up because he has no awareness whatsoever.

I'd suggest you go use the search function on the forum and look up the multitude of threads posted calling people on the left pedophiles, groomers, creeps, etc..... And I'm not saying Democrats don't throw stupid terms at Republicans- just saying it is insane to pretend like Republicans don't do the same.

The crux of politics - accuse the other side of being something without recognizing that your own party is guilty of the same thing as well. Lots of posters on both sides here guilty of that.

Cool. I'm not on any side of the aisle so don't paint with such a wide brush. I have no pals here. You are all faceless weirdos to me as I should be to you. But I mean Maximum Overkill is close to you in ideological beliefs and he literally believes anything posted online. So you know...I wouldn't throw stones.

I think they are funny to mention but I don't automatically believe them

I haven't seen that yet in my area. However, of course they were going to come down. They were up because of bird flu. Once that gets fixed the prices were going to come down.

I tend to think the media also is complicit in whitewashing some of the more crazy things Trump says but that is getting into our individual perceptions of the media and that's near impossible to argue. I'll gladly accept and stop at the fact that we agree politicians are pretty much stinkin' liars and thus should not necessarily be trusted as some reliable source on anything.

The autopen? I mean I'm not sure there are enough people wanting my autograph that I couldn't just sign things but I'll take it. Maybe I can sell it on eBay or something

The amount of people who allow Trump to take up so much head space for them here is only matched by the amount of people who desperately hope Trump visits here to see the multiple threads they have started praising him.

According to "anonymous sources" again....

I don't know that he does it more or not. But at least you seemingly agree that a politician may not be truthful meaning they might not be the best source for information. Do you apply the same reasoning when Trump does something and an "anonymous source" reports on it?

Obviously I meant legislative above.....my bad.

He is quoting stuff that came from anonymous sources. He also isn't truthful most of the time.

Who are my sources? Why do you people do this stuff? You make up an argument to rail against that isn't rooted in fact and just continue on with it. Also- I doubt Trump has any clue what was happening in the Biden presidency. Additionally, Trump regularly lies. He isn't a paragon of virtue. But it works because people like you are ready to suck up whatever he spills.

If we ever get evidence that Biden cognitively impaired to the point people were passing stuff by him without approval- yes that would be a concern. But I don't necessarily put a ton of stock in back biting weasels from his Presidency who are now trying to do everything they can to kick dirt on him because they lost so decisively in 2024. There are a lot of conditional statements in your post but you are fine with immediately jumping to the conclusions.

Trump has already started the process of bypassing the legislative branch of the government- might as well blow past the judicial branch as well. His sycophants won't care. They love when Trump does the stuff they accuse Democrats of doing.

So now you believe "anonymous sources"?

Celebs will use it sometimes at autograph signings and stuff like that.

https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/local/2025/03/16/he-voted-for-trump-then-ice-detained-his-wife/82469657007/ A fun FA&FO story... Still though- feel bad for the guy and the woman. But this is what happens when policy is enacted in sweeping change as opposed to looking at situations. If she is in the process of getting her paperwork done and you can check all that. AND you can see the circumstances as to why she couldn't go back initially there needs to be some recognition of that. She isn't some gang banger bringing drugs over the border or killing innocent American citizens.

2nd time you've posted this today already. How many times do you have to say it before you level up to the next phase of Trump fandom?

Do you feel better after that hissy fit? I don't really care where they sign documents. If it is a good sound policy or thing and it will help people you can sign it in the bathroom while you are taking a dump for all I care. Biden signing those pardons on camera wouldn't have really made them any better. And I'll venture a strong guess you wouldn't be here saying "Man I hate that signing, but at least he did it in front of the camera." I don't have "sources". I'm not rooting against Trump. I'm not calling for "illegal gang bangers" to come back. I simply said- Trump is a showman who loves spectacle. He doesn't care if it is good policy or not as long as he can do it for a camera, hold it up, awkwardly fumble around to show everybody, and then have a bunch of sycophants leap to see who can be the first one to slap him on the back for it.

Yes- because he cares more about empty spectacle than sound policy of any kind. But I get it- he did TV. He knows how to sell himself to people