Sean Mooney

You dummies always jump to one extreme to try and prove your point.

It was most definitely a Redners. It was also most definitely Oz completely out of touch with the common person. There were so many things he said in that video that were ridiculous it is no wonder he lost.

This whole idea of an investment in AI technology on the surface seems fine, but it is going to mess with jobs in a bad way. I also love the idea that a company with 30 billion in cash on hand is going to invest 100 billion dollars. There is a lot of things that need to hit right for that to happen.

My favorite part was Jerry getting mad because I said "some jackasses" of 1.9 billion worldwide. His response was to say 39% of one area that has 2 million members of the religious persuasion is evidence it isn't "some jackasses"

Exactly. This is the point I made and Jerry whacked out over it. Again- if you judge any group by the most extreme position holders in that group you are wiping out large swaths of people.

I jumped in on you decrying the entire of the Islam faith and saying it wasn't valuable to humankind. Maybe you didn't get that far yet in your thread reboot? You seem to do this a lot. You make one statement, and then you argue a bunch of things around it and when you get called on it you say "You didn't read my first post...focus on that and not the inane posts I gave later." It's also clear you obfuscate the point about this stuff. As to the rape and sexaul assualt thing: From Deuteronomy chapter 22, verses 13-29: Clearly some of this is not good. But the important passage is in bold. If a woman is raped outside the city she is protected from punishment because it was obvious she didn't consent and no one would have been able to save her. If it happens in the city though she should be stoned to death with her attacker if she doesn't cry out. Now theologically people would argue that the verses are telling people the consequences so they never get to letting these actions happening- but you could also see how someone would misinterpret the verses and act upon them in those times. Even today there are people who would argue a person is unclean if they are sexually assaulted. Additionally, newer schools of Christian thought would argue the story in John 8 reflects a reconsideration of these rules, but there are denominations of the Christian and Catholic faiths that don't really follow the New testament so they wouldn't recognize them. As to gay marriage: The Bible has plenty of passages that go about gay marriage and I'm sure you know them because they are debated as to what they are saying at all times. There are people who take those verses very seriously and will shun or scorn gay people because of them and will fight against gay rights because of those passages. Again- people who pervert the word of God for their own purposes. But even still- I don't think anyone is saying we should dismiss the entirety of the religion because of some backwards beliefs or thinking. That's the point. You made the claim that Islam is not useful to humankind. In that discussion you said "Here are their thoughts on this and that." I asked you to look at all religions and you refused. Again- it's because you know the answer. You just want to stay boxed into your way of thinking.

It's probably like the end of Elf with all the people singing in the park. Someone isn't giving enough thoughts and prayers. If we find them and convince them to do it we can probably stop this thing. He's a drooling idiot

Full on- "Feet don't fail me now" moment

He's an ophthalmologist.

"Guys- just read my first post and ignore everything else I said..."

Don't tell Jerry he can't paint with a wide brush.....

I get it- you don't want to see the reality of religion that runs counter to what you want to believe. We don't stone you- but we will shun you and not acknowledge your marriage and discourage Christians from supporting it.

Now do all the other religions. Also, lots of Christians denounce gay weddings as an affront to God. So by your logic all Christians are against gay marriage

You didn't address my questions so you keep deflecting from them.

Maximum Overkill weepaws peefoam (and his various aliases)

Probably Internet COVID.....it is an epidemic that we were going to blow the cover off of but the whistleblower was murdered and it's a big tech conspiracy to cover it up. jonmx has been licking boots over it for weeks now.

Are you checking off a bingo card at this point?

Yes it is....Jerry you are so wrong on this. You are giving a poll that provides fractions of fractions of people and trying to apply that to the whole. There are 1.9 people who practice islam around the world. There are like 2 million people in Gaza I believe. Even if they were all Islamic (they are not) that would mean like 780K agree with it....you don't see how that is "some jackasses" against the broader scope of the religion.

Yup- but again I'd say the same thing I did about the Mohammed stuff- there is theological debate about it. Additionally- Jewish women could become engaged and/or married as early as 12 and would often have physical relationships within a few months or years after that action. Religion of all kinds gets pretty squirrely if you dig too deep into it. He did do something very wrong. How far are you planning to go down this path? Also, I'm sorry I know theological debate about this.

Looks like since he can't get a rise out of me and I won't ##### him, HT has moved onto you. Enjoy his derangement of following you around the board trying to get you to respond to him.

Yes I am aware there is theological scholarly debate about the age of one of Mohammed's wives which has placed their marriage at various ages and the consummation of their marriage at various ages- some legal, some underage. Seeing as there is no agreement across the board on this I would say it is inconsequential to the discussion at hand until further knowledge is known. I would also add a lot of this is in a culture where they arrange marriages for people at a very young age which is a practice that makes no sense to me. But should definitive evidence and thought at some point coalesce behind an age of the wife and that age be underage than yes I would say it would call into question the wisdom in listening to a prophet who engaged in pedophilic actions.

Dude you are devaluing a religion practiced by like 2 billion people worldwide because there are some jackasses who take the wrong messages from it. Islam promotes optimism and a positive outlook on life. It talks about accountability for one's actions. It decries racism. It focuses on healthy living and basic human morality and promotes a strong belief in giving to charity. Yes it has restrictions on art and culture and people misinterpret the principles and promote it as a means for killing someone- but again- those people are crazy and just prescribing a rationale after the fact. For you to just say "Islam isn't good for the world" either is: a.) a fundamental lack of understanding of what the religion entails b.) a horribly misguided attempt to paint 25% of the world's population belief system in a negative light c.) or just being a completely religiously intolerant idiot. And nowhere did I say they are the same religion wise. So that is a bad strawman to use here.

Can you tell us how you prepare the boots you lick?

The entire left does? From what I can see online it looks like a scattering of idiots do it.

It's pretty convenient that all the people who can provide evidence get killed off. It's almost as if someone says something stupid but they can just never prove it