Sean Mooney

Still couldn't provide a simple yes or no answer. You didn't accept anything. You posted your initial thoughts. You got hit with a bunch of examples and tried to deflect. Back on page 1 I pointed out how a lot of this right now is because the Democrats haven't given a plan moving forward yet- which they will at some point. But they haven't yet for whatever reason. But you continue to deflect and try to pretend like it is a one way flowing street which is insane and idiotic. And that is part and parcel for you because you never admit you are wrong, you always try to paint everything as if it is only flowing one way, and you essentially come off like a fooking fool. Face it- you are a tunnel visioned dolt whose posts are basically if someone took Maximum Overkill's words and ran them through ChatGPT. Save your sanctimonious act for someone else.

when did you accept that? Also, like I said- just because they havent done something yet doesn't mean they never will. But you wanted to run with your faulty premise from the jump. You also still couldn't just say yes or no.

Dude- it's a simple "yes/no" question. So if the left was in the same position it would be okay for them to be calling the right "evil" and everything because they are winning. This question followed you saying "Who is winning. Think about it."

So if the left was in the same position it would be okay for them to be calling the right "evil" and everything because they are winning.

This should be a bridge too far for Trump supporters. Should be......but won't be. They are too busy flossing with his public hair

I guess if Democrats haven't figured out a post Trump strategy **checks notes** 2 months in to Trump's term they are doomed forever I guess.

https://imgflip.com/i/9ns9kw

Well- that was less than 200 words....it didn't clear up the tunnel vision thing though.

I'm not doing anything. Democrats wouldn't like what I have to say anyway. Republicans wouldn't either. The real magic though would be for once you seeing both sides of an issue without writing more than 200 words about how you have tunnel vision.

I will repeat: 2015-2016 there were a ton of things written about how "The Republicans might struggle to win another election again because of shifting demographics amid a post Obama Presidency. Obviously those articles were idiotically premature. Right now there are a bunch of articles the other way because the Republicans just cleaned up in November and the Democrats don't seemingly have a unified plan going forward yet. Of course they will figure out some plan, they will rally behind that, and rally behind whoever leads the party. The other issue right now is that Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi are the most notable faces in the party and they are both old, out of touch, dopes who need to be sent to the political glue factory. But of course RLLD has to start a thread saying "Democrats assert whoever doesn't share their beliefs are evil." When presented with the idea that it isn't solely a one sided issue on insisting the other side is evil he bloviates nonsensically. When pointed out to him the President does the exact thing he is saying he tries to deflect. When he is asked to use the search function here that is too hard for him. Dude is tonally unaware.

A lot of words to ignore the crux of everything I said...seriously- when you want to come back to reality let me know

The problem is that you don't see how these same things were said a decade ago in the opposite direction. The problem is that you framed it as "The Democrats have spent years indoctrinating their base into the notion that those who do not share their beliefs are evil. " and were told both parties do this anymore. You decided to blow all of that off. The problem is you don't see how this is kind of standard at the beginning of presidencies stuff. Simply put- you are delusional and intentionally being intellectually dishonest.

RLLD really isn't worth the time. He can't see simple truths plastered right in front of him and he thinks if he writes a lot of words about them he will never have to confront them.

2015-2016 there were a ton of things written about how "The Republicans might struggle to win another election again because of shifting demographics amid a post Obama Presidency. Obviously those articles were idiotically premature. Right now there are a bunch of articles the other way because the Republicans just cleaned up in November and the Democrats don't seemingly have a unified plan going forward yet. Of course they will figure out some plan, they will rally behind that, and rally behind whoever leads the party. The other issue right now is that Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi are the most notable faces in the party and they are both old, out of touch, dopes who need to be sent to the political glue factory. But of course RLLD has to start a thread saying "Democrats assert whoever doesn't share their beliefs are evil." When presented with the idea that it isn't solely a one sided issue on insisting the other side is evil he bloviates nonsensically. When pointed out to him the President does the exact thing he is saying he tries to deflect. When he is asked to use the search function here that is too hard for him. Dude is tonally unaware.

Because you missed this sentence- I will say it again: And I'm not saying Democrats don't throw stupid terms at Republicans- just saying it is insane to pretend like Republicans don't do the same.

Yeah, but other than the President...nobody in the Republican party is calling the Democrats "evil". I'm sure RLLD will tell you it's all made up because he has no awareness whatsoever.

I'd suggest you go use the search function on the forum and look up the multitude of threads posted calling people on the left pedophiles, groomers, creeps, etc..... And I'm not saying Democrats don't throw stupid terms at Republicans- just saying it is insane to pretend like Republicans don't do the same.

The crux of politics - accuse the other side of being something without recognizing that your own party is guilty of the same thing as well. Lots of posters on both sides here guilty of that.

Cool. I'm not on any side of the aisle so don't paint with such a wide brush. I have no pals here. You are all faceless weirdos to me as I should be to you. But I mean Maximum Overkill is close to you in ideological beliefs and he literally believes anything posted online. So you know...I wouldn't throw stones.

I think they are funny to mention but I don't automatically believe them

I haven't seen that yet in my area. However, of course they were going to come down. They were up because of bird flu. Once that gets fixed the prices were going to come down.

I tend to think the media also is complicit in whitewashing some of the more crazy things Trump says but that is getting into our individual perceptions of the media and that's near impossible to argue. I'll gladly accept and stop at the fact that we agree politicians are pretty much stinkin' liars and thus should not necessarily be trusted as some reliable source on anything.

The autopen? I mean I'm not sure there are enough people wanting my autograph that I couldn't just sign things but I'll take it. Maybe I can sell it on eBay or something

According to "anonymous sources" again....

I don't know that he does it more or not. But at least you seemingly agree that a politician may not be truthful meaning they might not be the best source for information. Do you apply the same reasoning when Trump does something and an "anonymous source" reports on it?