Sean Mooney

Obviously I meant legislative above.....my bad.

He is quoting stuff that came from anonymous sources. He also isn't truthful most of the time.

Who are my sources? Why do you people do this stuff? You make up an argument to rail against that isn't rooted in fact and just continue on with it. Also- I doubt Trump has any clue what was happening in the Biden presidency. Additionally, Trump regularly lies. He isn't a paragon of virtue. But it works because people like you are ready to suck up whatever he spills.

If we ever get evidence that Biden cognitively impaired to the point people were passing stuff by him without approval- yes that would be a concern. But I don't necessarily put a ton of stock in back biting weasels from his Presidency who are now trying to do everything they can to kick dirt on him because they lost so decisively in 2024. There are a lot of conditional statements in your post but you are fine with immediately jumping to the conclusions.

Trump has already started the process of bypassing the legislative branch of the government- might as well blow past the judicial branch as well. His sycophants won't care. They love when Trump does the stuff they accuse Democrats of doing.

So now you believe "anonymous sources"?

Celebs will use it sometimes at autograph signings and stuff like that.

https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/local/2025/03/16/he-voted-for-trump-then-ice-detained-his-wife/82469657007/ A fun FA&FO story... Still though- feel bad for the guy and the woman. But this is what happens when policy is enacted in sweeping change as opposed to looking at situations. If she is in the process of getting her paperwork done and you can check all that. AND you can see the circumstances as to why she couldn't go back initially there needs to be some recognition of that. She isn't some gang banger bringing drugs over the border or killing innocent American citizens.

2nd time you've posted this today already. How many times do you have to say it before you level up to the next phase of Trump fandom?

Do you feel better after that hissy fit? I don't really care where they sign documents. If it is a good sound policy or thing and it will help people you can sign it in the bathroom while you are taking a dump for all I care. Biden signing those pardons on camera wouldn't have really made them any better. And I'll venture a strong guess you wouldn't be here saying "Man I hate that signing, but at least he did it in front of the camera." I don't have "sources". I'm not rooting against Trump. I'm not calling for "illegal gang bangers" to come back. I simply said- Trump is a showman who loves spectacle. He doesn't care if it is good policy or not as long as he can do it for a camera, hold it up, awkwardly fumble around to show everybody, and then have a bunch of sycophants leap to see who can be the first one to slap him on the back for it.

Yes- because he cares more about empty spectacle than sound policy of any kind. But I get it- he did TV. He knows how to sell himself to people

So many people don't understand what the purpose of the DOE is....it's a shame. It will be the kids who need the most help who suffer the most. But I guess as long as people can pull out their lotion and tissues to Elon Musk with a chainsaw it doesn't matter if the kid with fetal alcohol syndrome and CP gets the help they need to have any chance at success.

WDS

I wonder if the computers overheat from tracking all of Trump's lies. We've got one party in this country right now led by a pathological liar who could promise to defecate in people's mouths once they bend the knee and plenty of posters here would line up like a Black Friday sale line. The other party is an ineffective group of dolts who couldn't decide where they want to go for lunch, let alone try to lead the country. And they take their cues from Chuck Schumer- a guy who looks like a Keebler Elf made a wish to be taller.

Of course the Dem numbers are low. What have they remotely done at this point that even resembles a clear vision of the party going forward? Also- it's been a while so I want to make sure I didn't miss it- did jonmx ever share his recipe for how he prepares the boots he licks all day long?

You dummies always jump to one extreme to try and prove your point.

It was most definitely a Redners. It was also most definitely Oz completely out of touch with the common person. There were so many things he said in that video that were ridiculous it is no wonder he lost.

This whole idea of an investment in AI technology on the surface seems fine, but it is going to mess with jobs in a bad way. I also love the idea that a company with 30 billion in cash on hand is going to invest 100 billion dollars. There is a lot of things that need to hit right for that to happen.

My favorite part was Jerry getting mad because I said "some jackasses" of 1.9 billion worldwide. His response was to say 39% of one area that has 2 million members of the religious persuasion is evidence it isn't "some jackasses"

Exactly. This is the point I made and Jerry whacked out over it. Again- if you judge any group by the most extreme position holders in that group you are wiping out large swaths of people.

I jumped in on you decrying the entire of the Islam faith and saying it wasn't valuable to humankind. Maybe you didn't get that far yet in your thread reboot? You seem to do this a lot. You make one statement, and then you argue a bunch of things around it and when you get called on it you say "You didn't read my first post...focus on that and not the inane posts I gave later." It's also clear you obfuscate the point about this stuff. As to the rape and sexaul assualt thing: From Deuteronomy chapter 22, verses 13-29: Clearly some of this is not good. But the important passage is in bold. If a woman is raped outside the city she is protected from punishment because it was obvious she didn't consent and no one would have been able to save her. If it happens in the city though she should be stoned to death with her attacker if she doesn't cry out. Now theologically people would argue that the verses are telling people the consequences so they never get to letting these actions happening- but you could also see how someone would misinterpret the verses and act upon them in those times. Even today there are people who would argue a person is unclean if they are sexually assaulted. Additionally, newer schools of Christian thought would argue the story in John 8 reflects a reconsideration of these rules, but there are denominations of the Christian and Catholic faiths that don't really follow the New testament so they wouldn't recognize them. As to gay marriage: The Bible has plenty of passages that go about gay marriage and I'm sure you know them because they are debated as to what they are saying at all times. There are people who take those verses very seriously and will shun or scorn gay people because of them and will fight against gay rights because of those passages. Again- people who pervert the word of God for their own purposes. But even still- I don't think anyone is saying we should dismiss the entirety of the religion because of some backwards beliefs or thinking. That's the point. You made the claim that Islam is not useful to humankind. In that discussion you said "Here are their thoughts on this and that." I asked you to look at all religions and you refused. Again- it's because you know the answer. You just want to stay boxed into your way of thinking.

It's probably like the end of Elf with all the people singing in the park. Someone isn't giving enough thoughts and prayers. If we find them and convince them to do it we can probably stop this thing. He's a drooling idiot

Full on- "Feet don't fail me now" moment

He's an ophthalmologist.

"Guys- just read my first post and ignore everything else I said..."