Sean Mooney

It's not uncommon for people who are in a tight race to downplay their connections to the main candidate on their ticket as a means of winning. It is a little odd to tie it so closely to the other candidate but it's not unprecedented.

You brought up Hillary and denying the 2016 election. I pointed out Trump has his own history of that and even complained that he didn't win the 2016 election big enough. And now you are crying because you're evidence easily had some holes punched in it. I will rightly assume too that your thoughts on this are because once again you refuse to criticize Trump for things. Complaining about losing a "rigged election" is idiotic- whether it is Hillary or Donald doing it. But I'm not going to pretend like one side does it and one doesn't.

The October surprise will be Horseman finally stands up to use the bathroom rather than defecating in his diaper per usual.

"I have posted it. I save my posts in links so it should be easy to bring up but I won't. is some serious break in logic.

Bringing Hillary into the debate, being asked about Trump then (because that is the references election she is denying) and then pretending that "it is irrelevant about the election denying." is some idiotic garbage being spewed.

Then show the "multiple interviews". Again- you shared 3 links which are referencing the same interview. The second link is the CBS interview as posted on YouTube by CBS Sunday morning- 5 years ago The first link reads The third link reads: " 3 articles that reference the same interview is one example, not 3.. HTH

You are forgetting the guy with the skeleton in his basement on youTube who said it, so it must be true. RLLD has no credibility on the economic issues. He ruined that weeks ago.

All 3 of those Clinton links are referencing the same interview. And yes- she is stupid for claiming that. So it's not "different" It's idiotic. Now are you willing to call out Trump as being idiotic for the same thing? Trump before the 2016 election: https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37673797 https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/17/us/politics/donald-trump-election-rigging.html The Trump complaint timeline- in regards to 2016, 2018, 2020, and 2022 elections, the 2012 election, and the Emmys: https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/timeline-donald-trumps-election-denial-claims-republican-politicians/story?id=89168408 Election Denialism article: https://www.cato.org/commentary/yes-democrats-have-called-some-elections-illegitimate-gop-election-denialism-far-worse Trump tries to sue Hillary over 2016 election https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/mar/24/trump-hillary-clinton-russia-lawsuit-2016-election Trump saying he won the popular vote in a landslide in 2016 after you deduct all the illegal ballots: https://www.npr.org/2016/11/27/503506026/trump-makes-unfounded-claim-that-millions-voted-illegally-for-clinton https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2019/01/trump-continues-to-attack-rigged-elections/580030/

It's the only thing they have.

Serious question: What story could possibly come out that would make anyone switch their vote from Trump to Harris? I think there is a more likely scenario of someone switching from Harris to a 3rd party candidate than a Trump voter switching off of Trump

To quote a fantasy football segment on an old podcast: "News or Noise"?

The surprise will be no surprise.

Is this where you are going to whine because I comment back to you on a message board when you address me?

His family spoke up for him. Read the news once in a while instead of being a sh!t sipping idiot.

Can you link to all the times Hillary complained about losing? Can you link to all the times Trump complained he didn't win big enough? TIA

Trump got Antonio Brown and Leveon Bell Harris got Jerome Bettis, Mean Joe Greene, and Franco Harris. So one person got legit legends to the Yinzers and the other got the mayors of crazy town.

BREAKING: LEAGUE CHAMPION'S IQ IS 11....CONFIRMED.

And here you are to post and prove the bolded.

I didn't say I support any of it. But I'm also not naive about this stuff like you all seem to be. These people in power have no want to diminish their own power. Not to mention- Trump had a chance once to "drain the swamp" and he just put a different type of a$$hole into power as opposed to the normal a$$holes and widened the swamp. If you think a New York rich elite who has benefitted from this system in place multiple times is now going to come in and upend it all after he chose not to the first time despite saying he would.... well I got some magic beans I can sell you Hell remember when he first announced this time it was surrounding "term limits for politicians".....You heard him mention that again in the past year?

The good news for Trump is when he does almost none of this- the seals will still clap for him and open their mouths for whatever he wants to put in there. So he can't lose.

30 million dollars just dumped in....that's just regular "betters" You should really listen to the "life winner" who has 5 or 6 screen names on a fantasy football message board to sh!t post people in between housing cases of Little Debbie snack cakes.

but have you considered all government is lying and Trump- is the hero who is going to save everyone. I bet you haven't considered that at all.

This is a good thorough series of reads from The Economist about the economy. The article is entitled "The Envy of the World: America's Economy is Bigger and Better Than Ever". It looks at many statistics as to where we are, the change over history, provides a ton of context, and talks about where politics- and both the policies of either Kamala or Donald- could mess things up going forward. It links to other articles in the main article that go into some further detail on things. This is a splash page with a ton of articles to click into. They should all work link wise- if an individual one does not I can circle back to it for you: https://archive.ph/36P6l Some key points:

I get way more than you

I've posted here long enough I can see how many people don't get it