Sean Mooney

That is a pretty good look at the real issues that surround some of this outside of just fear mongering.

Dude- I'm not going on this circle with you again. You looked like a fool there, you looked like a fool on the whole idea about Trump not needing to admit mistakes. Just stop while you are way behind.

From the start I've said Trump will win because PA will flip. You've said it will be a Trump bloodbath and you said all seven swing states will go for Trump and one of Virginia, New Hampshire, Minnesota. Now you want to put conditions on it. Sounds like you are not strong in your convictions.

You are calling a swing state sweep and one of NH, Minnesota, Virginia to flip... Care to make a friendly wager on that? Winner gets to select a new username for the loser until the end of 2024.

To me it isn't so much about agreeing or disagreeing with a poll although I understand there are individual biases that are in play. But looking at the methodology of a study shows how reliable it is or is not....the methodology and sample size here should make one take pause.

Several people who served as fake electors in the scheme to overturn the 2020 election may be electors in the 2024 election, despite the fact that they’re facing felony charges. Politico reported on Monday that across seven battleground states, eight of the 93 prospective Republican electors are facing criminal charges for their role in the scheme orchestrated by former President Donald Trump’s campaign. Some of them continue to push the lie that Trump won the 2020 election that he lost to President Joe Biden. Politico wrote this article on it: https://www.politico.com/news/2024/11/04/trump-fake-electors-return-election-denial-00186977-

There are about 21,000 black people in New Hampshire according to the 2022 census. The poll talked to 12, or .06%. That is not an accurate representation- especially when factored into the poll demographics

I've not misrepresented you once. Multiple times I've presented your words against you and just watched you twist in the wind. It's not lying, it's not gaslighting, it's not whatever word you want to attach next. I do not have a problem with people voting their feelings or reality. I'm not a hypocrite like you in that regard where I will twist one way and then the other.

Maximum Overkill is/was LeagueChampion and Blue Horseshoe....same posting style, same reliance on Twitter links and long thread titles with emojis in them. Same shallow thought process as well.

You are calling a swing state sweep and one of NH, Minnesota, Virginia to flip... Care to make a friendly wager on that? Winner gets to select a new username for the loser until the end of 2024.

I do love too that every poll in New Hampshire is in favor of Harris by like: +4, +5, +7, +9, +21, +11 and then you find one that says Trump is up 1% and your thought process is "OMG THAT SHOWS BLOODBATH!" and not "Hmm....that one seems like an outlier, much like that +21 in favor of Harris"

1.) Yes it is always you being "misrepresented." The more accurate descriptor is you are very hypocritical about things in discussions. 2.) I don't have a problem with people voting in favor of their feelings over facts. I'm also not the one who has complained about that in the past here who is in favor of it now..

Yes we know- your feelings on inflation- all one party, no blame to the other....got it. They are going to vote the other way because their perception is different than what they feel their reality is- as every poll I've shared points out. Feelz not facts....it's fine- just admit it.

First off- boy you can't even go like an hour or two without mentioning me. This even after I decided to ease up on running you into the ground. Just sad man. And no of course not everyone's reality is the same: Case in point- I have a functioning brain in my head capable of critical thought. You have a 14-month-old, moldy salami sandwich in your head that fuels your autistic rage. So no our realities are not the same. Now run along

It does not only benefit the wealthy. That's silly. And yes people might vote them out- because they are voting their perceptions and not their reality. Again- feelz, not facts.

Did you actually look at the methodology of the poll? There are some problems with it: 1.) They talked to 622 "registered voters". Firstly, that is a smallish sample size even by traditionally small sample sizes in these things. Second- registered voters is the wrong way to approach the polls. Likely voters are the better way to go because they are obviously more inclined to vote. Doesn't mean there is nothing useful from registered voters but still. But look at the numbers of people polled on the other polls (numbers from RealClearPolitics): 2814, 2791, 901, 915, 600, 2104, 1695, 2241, 2108, etc 2.) The poll is heavily skewed towards white voters- and there is some belief they lumped "white/hispanic" together. Of the 622 people they polled 591 of them were white. They included 12 black people in the poll. I wasn't saying she was going to win Iowa. I'm just saying it is stupid to say "I'll castrate myself if she does" and then walk it back like an idiot.

No gaslighting needed. The polls I've shown indicate that people feel they are doing well but the economy is bad. The numbers show a lot of the surrounding metrics are good. You continue to advocate people should vote their feelings. It's fine but be honest about it, and understand that some people will vote their feelings on other issues whether you like them or not.

Be careful listing this because Horseman/Roger Dodger,/JuneJuly/JoseM has a real issue with people pointing out how sad people are for having multiple aliases on the board here.

So once again you are advocating people voting for their feelings rather than the reality?

Hmmmmm

Some dude on Twitter- Joey Mannarino- said if Kamala wins Iowa he will castrate himself live on Twitter if it happens. He then backtracked to say "if it is legitimate." People get too invested in political fandom

Is this based on more of these polls that no one other than jonmx has seen?

So they did give Trump time after the NASCAR race. The law was followed. A non-story....move on

Your argument is a live TV doesn't try to do things for clicks? Also- NBC filed a notice with the FCC and offered Trump equal time to address viewers during today's NASCAR race allegedly.

Because they want something that will draw views on social media.