Sean Mooney

That skit is still hilarious. So many great exchanges and lines;

I said it's dumb to call Trump a facist and Nazi. I think it's dumb to call a politician a communist and everything. But what are centrists supposed to object to in the CNN story. They talk about the Trump rally. They talk about the political history of rallies there both positive and negative.. They mention that Walz made comment of the negative side of the history. Like what is the objection to all of it?

Stop referring to everything as Nazis. It's insulting to people who actually suffered at the hands of them. The real head scratcher from the rally was bringing in a dude who was going to make a racist joke when you are trying to court black voters. Like why wouldn't you do a better job of vetting him? Or is he went off the cuff get him out of there and make a comment against it later?

That's not really what I said but if you want to lie, or misconstrue, to prove your point, I won't stop you. You nhever answered either- do you deny there are meds that boost testosterone and estrogen production?

It's his job to let you know how stupid you are..... I guess we should be blessed that a "life winner" feels he needs to own like at max 150 people in a political area on a fantasy football message board. Pretty sure that was the 8th habit of highly successful people

Not to mention a guy who types that and posts under multiple screen names here so he can have different "personalities"

2020 wasn't rigged. He lost and can't accept it to this day. He couldn't accept that he didn't win 2016 by more. Also- the media likes Trump in the role he is in. It gives them stuff that provides ratings. They don't hate him.

So that seems very similar to 2020 then on almost all accounts as to when people vote.

"Life winner" who wrote "loose" instead of "lose" in another thread after he has spent 2 days mocking me for getting the name of a podcast wrong. His rent must be coming due at the trailer park and he is worried about being on his knees that long to pay off his rent.

Have we established yet how much it does cost to bury a "##### Mexican"

Well I trust it a little more then....but still..

I really doubt the accuracy of "ShapiroDemocrat" on Twitter.

It's also notable- you've never asked my opinion on it. You assume my opinion. You yell "YOUR PARTY" "YOUR SCOTUS" but you don't actually know where I stand on it. I also do wonder if you're concern for women extends to them being able to get abortions and the like?

There was some discrepancy as to what the policy would do from experts. Additionally by some markers of how to define a woman they would be woman playing whether you or I like it or not. If you take the order a particular way it reads the way you want it too but there is more to it then that and it's more nuanced than you are making it. This isn't a cut and dry issue on many levels.

You are inferring things I was not agreeing with in the article because it fits your narrative you want to present. I think there is a lot to the process of all this that is unknown or is very personal to the people involved. I don't like aspects of the care provided but I also don't feel like I should be dictating to someone in this case what they should be doing because it affects them personally.

I can believe he doesn't see himself as a victim....but he definitely uses himself as the victim as a selling point. It's his method of being "just like you..." when he isn't anything like the common man. He's manipulating them intelligently.

For the last time I don't have a "party." That is just you trying to position someone against you because they aren't 100% lockstep in thought with you. Just stop. And that question tot eh SCOTUS judge was an ignorant gotcha attempt that was not quite as equally stupid as trying to castigate a dude for drinking some beers in college but it was up there. To you it might be a simple answer but there is some complication to it and it showed she is willing to look at all aspects of a question rather than popping off an answer. Also- did you get that list of politicians who want men in women's sports.

Do you deny there are meds to boost testosterone and estrogen production in individuals? This gets at some of the questions I am asking/wondering about. No need to be a D!ck about it https://www.healthline.com/health/are-puberty-blockers-reversible#if-discontinued I was referring to the mental state of stuff as that was what the study was looking at.

that is a complete exaggeration.

What politician wants to put females in male sports? What politician says they don't know what a woman is? Why does it always go back to that with you guys?

I don't support blockers....but there are meds you can take to boost testerone and estrogen production in a body...so maybe not specifically change back but increase the production. That's not uninformed- there is legitimate medicines that do that. I'm not sure how they would work against a previous puberty blocker- which is essentially blocking testosterone and estrogen production

I wasn't speaking to you directly about that comment- I didn't want to name people directly because too many here get their feels hurt right away. But there are people acting like this is just the news media showing itself by talking about endorsing a candidate- which again, happens all the time.

Yes sometimes it is. There should always be a threat of getting punched in the kisser.

The forum here is predominantly conservative and I like needling people....if this forum were predominantly liberal- whoever the liberal version of you would be- would be calling me a MAGA weirdo by how much I mocked them

Again I'm not sure what world some of you live in- newspapers have (at least as long as I've been alive) given endorsements to candidates. This whole story screams like either someone doing a favor or someone trying to create a story to drive likes to the paper