Sean Mooney

I don't have a horse in the Presidential race. I've said a number of times here I think Trump is going to win. I've also said I understand why. My individual happiness is not tied to a race between people I don't know and do not really care about. But none of that changes that you are just saying things that you know are not rooted in the reality of what is happening. It is rooted in what people perceive- which is people voting their feelings. And we know how much you abhor voting with the feelings....well until Republicans do it I suppose.

Lots of "life winners" attach their personal happiness to a Presidential election.

Lots of senile straight men talk about other dude's junk in the locker room.

I don't think HT is obtuse. He is just of a very low IQ in general.

And here's the thing for me: I would totally be on board with someone arguing: "Yes these people are voting with their feels and not what reality is....: or "The perception is stronger than the reality right now...." because there is an honesty in that and it is something that any campaign would be hard pressed to overcome. Also, too it gets at a fundamental tenet of human nature that we are often guided by our short term thinking than the overall picture. But that isn't the case RLLD is making.

The HT posting cycle: 1.) Get called on something he said 2.) Deny it 3.) Get shown evidence of what he said 4.) Accuse person of being triggered and insult them and/or their manhood we are here 5.) Post some other nonsense trying to pretend like he is a better person than another poster 6.) Return to step 1

1.) How convenient 2.) But the mistakes that only one side has to own up to. The other side does not have too. Got it. 3.) I didn't tout government numbers. 4.) The only child here is the one who makes assertions, gets asked to show evidence of them, and then backpedals like crazy. Maybe one day you will choose to actually show some of the evidence you purport to be showing.

Everything will magically go back to pre-COVID. That's the belief. Which again- if we are talking perception and reality....the reality is some of the things that COVID let out of the bottle- outside of political stuff- isn't going to easily go back into the bottle.

None of that provided evidence. Here is where you are- you have said Trump bears no blame for inflation despite me showing you lots of links that show he bares some responsibility even if it is not the majority of it. You said one of the most important things of being a President is admitting mistakes and when pressed on what mistakes Trump has owned up to you hemmed and hawed and then said "Well when the media asks him about them...." which undercuts your years of saying the media is out to get Trump. You've looked like a fool repeatedly on this forum in the past month. And now you add this nonsense in. I have no problem with you wanting to continually play the fool act. But just know it means no one takes you seriously at this point then.

I have never laughed it off or called them stupid. Just pointed out the difference between what they perceive and their reality. Again- you mention these polls. Should be easy to bring up.

Defending a piece of human garbage? Not a good choice.

No it is a poll apparently- where one white old guy argued with an old white lady for 131K YouTube subscribers and it is "POLL EVIDENCE"

The same polls where I showed that people were saying they are doing personally well but the overall economy is bad? The same polls where I argued there is a break between reality and perception for people if that is the story? And then you wrote a lot of words blowing it off. Where are the polls that corroborate what you are saying?

Where in this are you wishing no one harm?

Where does wishing rape on a kid because you disagree with their dad on a fantasy football message board fall on the Catholicism scale?

So one person's opinion is a poll?

the lazy is implied in the "I won't." HTH. Good try though

It's not uncommon for people who are in a tight race to downplay their connections to the main candidate on their ticket as a means of winning. It is a little odd to tie it so closely to the other candidate but it's not unprecedented.

You brought up Hillary and denying the 2016 election. I pointed out Trump has his own history of that and even complained that he didn't win the 2016 election big enough. And now you are crying because you're evidence easily had some holes punched in it. I will rightly assume too that your thoughts on this are because once again you refuse to criticize Trump for things. Complaining about losing a "rigged election" is idiotic- whether it is Hillary or Donald doing it. But I'm not going to pretend like one side does it and one doesn't.

The October surprise will be Horseman finally stands up to use the bathroom rather than defecating in his diaper per usual.

"I have posted it. I save my posts in links so it should be easy to bring up but I won't. is some serious break in logic.

Bringing Hillary into the debate, being asked about Trump then (because that is the references election she is denying) and then pretending that "it is irrelevant about the election denying." is some idiotic garbage being spewed.

Then show the "multiple interviews". Again- you shared 3 links which are referencing the same interview. The second link is the CBS interview as posted on YouTube by CBS Sunday morning- 5 years ago The first link reads The third link reads: " 3 articles that reference the same interview is one example, not 3.. HTH

You are forgetting the guy with the skeleton in his basement on youTube who said it, so it must be true. RLLD has no credibility on the economic issues. He ruined that weeks ago.

All 3 of those Clinton links are referencing the same interview. And yes- she is stupid for claiming that. So it's not "different" It's idiotic. Now are you willing to call out Trump as being idiotic for the same thing? Trump before the 2016 election: https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37673797 https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/17/us/politics/donald-trump-election-rigging.html The Trump complaint timeline- in regards to 2016, 2018, 2020, and 2022 elections, the 2012 election, and the Emmys: https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/timeline-donald-trumps-election-denial-claims-republican-politicians/story?id=89168408 Election Denialism article: https://www.cato.org/commentary/yes-democrats-have-called-some-elections-illegitimate-gop-election-denialism-far-worse Trump tries to sue Hillary over 2016 election https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/mar/24/trump-hillary-clinton-russia-lawsuit-2016-election Trump saying he won the popular vote in a landslide in 2016 after you deduct all the illegal ballots: https://www.npr.org/2016/11/27/503506026/trump-makes-unfounded-claim-that-millions-voted-illegally-for-clinton https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2019/01/trump-continues-to-attack-rigged-elections/580030/