Sean Mooney

What part would you like me to rewatch that is going to change what he said? Or just link whatever quote you want that is going to change what he said.

Lots of babies act out as well when they aren't being paid attention to.

That was 100% his quote. You be better

“The American media totally ignored this stuff until Donald Trump and I started talking about cat memes,” he said. “If I have to create stories so that the American media actually pays attention to the suffering of the American people, then that’s what I’m going to do…” So the VP candidate is admitting he is cool with lying about stuff. Great

Well I know how this will go already. I'll give a thoughtful response. You won't like it and you'll throws insults with the other usual suspects. But I'll go once more into the breach.... I guess a lot of it depends on what one feels the role of a moderator is in a debate. If one views it as simply asking questions back and forth then yes Davis and Muir went overboard. I view the role of a debate moderator as asking questions and pushing back or pushing for a more definitive answer when it calls for it. I would 100% disagree with them arguing policy with a candidate because that is playing favorites. I also do think it is fair play to fact check a candidate in real time especially if it is something especially egregious. But again- don't argue policy with candidates. I think Muir and Davis had very good moments in the debate and some bad ones. Muir did ask essentially why the Biden administration kept the Trump tariffs if they are "bad". Davis pushed on the abortion responses. Both Muir and Davis didn't take the bait where the candidates were daring the moderators to ask the other candidate a question on their abortion position. Also, for all the attention their 2 big fact checks on Trump got, it is not mentioned that they gave Trump over 5 minutes more of talk time instead of doing what some moderators would do and try to cut people off to equal out the time as much as possible. Both moderators could have done some things differently and I'd wager given a second chance they would. I also think the article with Davis and the whole portraying it as "ABC's rising star" is a problem with political discourse on TV anymore. Gone are the days of just reading the news and in this case just letting two candidates debate back and forth. Everything is a launching pad anymore or a place for people to get a foothold. I mean if FOX News gets to hold a debate and Trump gets his wish of Hannity or Ingraham moderating it- there would be the same nonsense. I would also like to point out that the Tweet from Colin Rugg uses the word "retaliation" in how Linsey Davis approached the moderating of the debate and the fact checks. At no point in the article he is referencing does that word appear. Rugg also says "Davis said to the LA Times that she didn’t want Trump’s comments to just “hang” there." She does mention that but also the article adds: "With co-moderator David Muir, Davis had studied hours of campaign rallies and interviews to prepare for the much-anticipated event at Philadelphia’s National Constitution Center, and were ready to counter the candidates’ most egregious statements." So the clear statements in the article are they prepared for both candidate's to go over the top. The one thing I think they missed pushing back on was the "fine people on both sides" claim from Harris which has been proven to not be 100% accurate. So- do I think they pushed a little more on Trump? Yes. I also think Trump provided the most egregious statements in the debate so it makes sense to some degree. I also feel like Trump's whole persona is victimhood so it was always going to be the story- and was one Trump was pushing before the debate even started. I'd say as well I've seen better debate moderators but I've also seen worse.

"And lo, a mighty warrior did come forth unto the battlefield, swift as a gazelle and fierce as a lion. With skill and agility, he did float as a butterfly and sting as a bee, for his hands did elude the grasp of his adversaries, and his eyes did perceive their every move. Yea, his enemies were confounded, for they could not lay a finger upon him. And all who witnessed his prowess did marvel and say, “Verily, this man is a master of combat, for he is as elusive as the wind and as deadly as the serpent.” And so did he vanquish his foes with grace and cunning, for his skill was unmatched and his victory assured." ---Romans 1:13 Amen. Thanks.

Seems like the only people who want to buy the affidavit as being real are F1erce and Reality. So a dummy and a window licker... Good deal

@F1erce is cool with this though....

Did the middle schooler you have locked in your basement high five you for that one?

There are so many inaccurate things in that affidavit it is comical.

They are so far up each other's azz they don't see sunshine. And HT comes in rolling again after he got called for links on things in another thread and ran and hid.

I think the right is pretty coordinated in how they approach their attacks. It just takes on a different trajectory at times. But I'm not going to handwave away what they do.

Wait- the right doesn't coordinate their messaging? Take this pet eating story. That started as a fake rumor on Twitter. People picked up on it over and over including the VP nominee. Then the President stated it in a debate. Then the MAGA people started memeing it and fabricating videos and more stories to show it was happening there and in other nearby towns. Social media has allowed these stories to quickly flame up and populate the cycles.

The Lord was so pleased with the initial verse he doth provided a second Bible verse of the day and warns you of wee pretenders pawing their keyboards: "And lo, a woman did cry out, saying, "Behold, my neck, my back, and yea, even my and my crack, let them be licked and attended to with fervor and zeal." And the people did marvel at her boldness and didst whisper amongst themselves, "Verily, she doth speaketh with great passion and desire." And the words of the woman spreadeth far and wide, causing much laughter and merriment among the land. And thus it hath been written for all eternity, a remembrance of the boldness and humor of the woman who dared to speaketh such words." Ruth 2:16 Amen Thanks

You said you were cool with bomb threats at schools because of Trump and Vance's comments. Just own it liar. I was kidding. Of course it isn't staged or faked. It would be insane to even play around like that for a candidate. But I knew it would trigger and catch someone and of course Reality took the bait. Dude is as smart as the chair he blasts store brand Cheeto dust farts into while typing online.

Keep deflecting and lying. You're focusing on the end result and not the actions that lead up to it. Also- I've been told for years when people shoot up a school that we can't blame a group for the actions of one (which I agree with) but now we have people who want to blame all liberals for the actions of one.

you said you are okay with schools having bomb threats because of Trump's words.

Iowa isn't blue. I thought the story I saw said Kamala has closed the gap there but it is still Trump's state.

Again- you said you are okay with schools having bomb threats because of Trump's words. You are the problem

Both sides are bad about this. Yes that would be centrist. Take some days off of here. Re-evaluate your life

That video has to be fake. I've been told many times here the media doesn't call out lies on the left.

So I say both sides are jackasses amping up rhetoric and need to tone it down. You say I'm cool with them spreading stories that get bomb threats or people openly calling for attempts against the current President and VP. And it's me that's the problem? And "my people?" Dude- I'm not left or right. I don't have a people. You clearly do and you are too childish to call them on their nonsense.

I question like I did the other day- are we still cool with the President and VP nominees for the GOP side spreading false stories about Haitians in Ohio that are leading to government offices and schools being closed due to bomb threats? Are we cool with Elon Musk questioning why no one is trying to kill Biden or Harris?

Again- there are so many inaccuracies in the stuff posted it is hard to take seriously. But yes- I guess they could have taken this story to a person who had like 120,000 followers on X and now this guy with 139,000 followers on YouTube is joining in.

What is about you people that you read something that says both sides are bad about this and has to say "Oh it's your ppl." You look like children who can't have a real conversation. Both sides amp up rhetoric beyond where it should be. I don't have a "ppl" because I refuse to pick sides or stan for dopey politicians. Additionally- you missed my two questions at the bottom so I'll repost them for you: