Horseman

Even the financial analyst NBC News had on: "In the long run all this is going to do is raise interest rates and punish those who pay on time. This isnt going to have the desired effect they are hoping for." Only the true retards fall for this stuff.

One of the judges they got normally handled parking ticket court.

Best bet on the board is Katie Britt's response word bingo: "Mexico" at plus money. +120 I think that's got a better shot than "cognitive" and "radical Islam" both at even money.

Only idiots think the SOTU is on Super Tuesday.

Fact Checked Lies O/U: 11.5

Biden to pass dementia test: NO -250

Trump +105 Biden +210 Big Mike +750 Newsome +1000 Harris +1600 Haley +2000

Flapping your gums. That's what I figured.

Let's see your homework. How does this pencil out, or are you just flapping your gums again and really don't have any idea?

They can't charge whatever they want. Send the IRS agents after them like you promised. This is student load forgiveness 2.0. Guess what, those late fees, you agreed to them when you signed up for the CC dumbasss. You'd probably be ok with them forgiving the loans altogether and make rich people and/or the banks pay it.

It's like they sit in a room and say, "What can we do to fool the dumbest people in the country to vote for us." "I know!. Let's get all those losers that can't figure out how to pay CC bills on time a break with late fees!"

It's just like student loan forgiveness. It's going to punish those who pay their bills on time, this time with higher interest rates.

The Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009 already put in place protections for banks to not be able to charge more than to recover the bank’s costs associated with late payment. Banks aren't going to help people pay their late fees. This will only cause a reshuffling of the deck. They'll just adjust the poor's "creditworthiness" so they pay a higher interest rate and lowering credit limits if they can still borrow at all. More Bidenomics foking the poor. And this time even the middle class if they carry a CC balance.

TOO BIG TO RIG!

It's your claim, the burden of proof is on you. If you can't prove it like HT asked you to then Hitchens's razor applies, what is asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence. You lose.

Trump Goes to Pound Town

If the information isn't available then you have no basis for your claim.

Only 10% dumb isn't anything to brag about.

I've always liked Sandra Bullock's look. Can't believe Jesse James (who I met once at Sturgis) couldn't hang on to her. He had it made.

You need to stop saying that. It's an incorrect way to assign burden of proof. You look incredibly stupid every time you say it. You are making the claim that there are not any gay members of Gays Against Groomers. If you're the one making that claim the burden of proof is on you. But either way: They don't have gay members OR they do have gay members. They're opposite claims, not negative. You can prove one and disprove the other by simply listing out all their members and their sexual orientation.