Horseman

I think you're missing a 20:1 split in there. But it doesn't matter. Point is I wouldn't advise anyone to buy a bunch of AMZN stock today (even though I placed that same bet and won years ago) based on their past performance alone. I don't know the details of capped/scarcity. What I do know is there aren't any laws or anything else making people use it. There isn't anything keeping it from becoming antiquated tomorrow. "It has variables you cannot account for" and "Price of missing out" do nothing but throw up more red flags for me. I don't think either of us are just holding onto cash, we're putting it to work for us to try and make more cash. It's interesting that you seem to discredit the US dollar yet it is the very thing you measure the value of BTC with.

I'll just focus on the easy one: The bold isn't true. In 2018 BTC was down 70% for the year. For example. If you're talking about the average per year over it's complete history I'd point you to AMZN and many others. AMZN beats BTC over it's own history by more than 10 fold. If it's neither of those two things above then you are arbitrarily picking your data points. And past results do not guarantee future results anyway. Volatility equals risk and with risk comes reward or loss. You're speculating on what might happen - just read the last two posts between you and Cdub, it's exactly gambling.

Crypto assets or assets in general? - not insured - volatile - threat of government regulation - security - payments are irreversible - transactions are anonymous I have a very small amount of crypto, a fraction of one percent of my total portfolio, but I would fall into the category of being good on wealth - don't need bitcoin exposure. I don't even buy individual stocks anymore, zero need to gamble on a commodity like crypto.

A supposed adult in Baltimore posted this.

Cheifs game is Satuday Night.

Bigger collapse, Jaguars or Eagles?

CLE -1.5 at HOU PHI -2.5 at TBB LAR +3.0 at DET GB +7.0 at DAL

Eagles peaking at just the right time.

Troy Nehls lost his man card. His wife made that statement for him.

Happy Patriots Day fellas!

No hard on posting. That's just gross.

Prince Andrew's name was redacted in Maxwell's disposition. We know its him because the line of questioning was about the puppet. Pretty sure anything Clinton will be redacted.

The unsurprising thing about Maxwell's disposition: Denied everything, argumentative and arrogant. The suprizing thing about Maxwell's disposition: The line of questioning about her and Epstein asking one (some) of these girls about having their baby.

So passionate yet Squid wont come out. Refuses to admit it. Talk about a hypocrite. Hypocrite tinkerbell.

Of the new documents being released from the Richards v Maxwelll civil suit? Zero to be nervous about, hes not on the witness or discovery lists that have already been released. Man you guys aren't too bright are you.

Same thing with Nadia Marcinkova.

Bring back the insane asylums so we can lock up these dress wearing freaks.

Tranny. This kid is as queer as squidrope is. Just look at him.

Sarah Kellen, co-conspirator in the first criminal case, took the 5th 98% of the time during her disposition.

Liberals are so racist they dont even get black humor.

Checkmate.