Horseman

Nice. No issues there. It just sounded like you were doing it the other way around.

If you learned to listen it wouldn't come across to you as arguing. I once invested a large portion of my portfolio in AMZN and GOOG and the gamble paid off, more than 6x the initial investment on both. That doesn't mean it was a smart thing to do. I could have just as easily ended up broke. Luckily I didn't learn that lesson the hard way. Since then, my company now pays for a financial advisor who I've been working with for 5 years or so and getting to retirement quickly and wealthy has become my obsession. I've read dozens of books. Knowing what I do today I wouldn't recommend doing what I did. There are a lot of safer ways to get essentially guaranteed results. You keep poking about buying high and selling low. You should learn about regular rebalancing an equity-fixed income portfolio. Its practically automatic selling high and buying low. It doesn't sound like you're doing that and besides giving up diversification you're giving away free money. I'd also suggest less individual stocks, unless you enjoy rolling the dice. Warren Buffett:

Yep. And I hadn't been following along so probably old news, but, they fired the two imbeciles that thought it was a good idea. That says something.

No. But that's a good illustration. If you're going to Monday morning quarterback why not just say, "incorrectly not being invested 100% in NVDA"? Because nobody would ever recommend doing that, that's why. And anybody that knows anything about investing would ever recommend being invested purely in equities either.

"incorrectly not being in pure equities" might be the dumbest thing ever posted about investing.

Can you at least learn how it embed a twitter link? I thought you did IT for a living.

Wat? I'm not picking anything. Why are you trying to accuse me of picking things when you're admittedly still gambling on individual stocks? And I wouldn't advise anyone to being purely in equities. You need at a minimum enough fixed income to take advantage of rebalancing. Look, it's clear you're not following along, I can suggest some good books on the subject if you want.

You sell high and buy low every time you rebalance. You don't have to know when it's going to happen, you just wait for it to happen.

Leave it to the effeminates to confuse spray tanning with makeup.

You're the idiot that said buying the dips is gambling.

That's going to leave a mark.

You're confused. Trying to time the market is gambling. Like, look what NVDA did today! Selling high and buying low are investing fundamentals.

It isn't gambling if you just understood my analogy.

Just a note for the effeminates: Nothing wrong with grabbing pvssy if they let you. Or banging a porn star. You should try it sometime.

Fun, sounds a lot like gambling. Did you sell some of NVDA or are you letting it ride? Because if you didn't then yesterday didn't really mean as much as you're making it out to be. For me, I'm starting to look at it differently. You've heard of Heinz Berggruen, one of the most prominent German art collectors of the 20th century? He was friends with Pablo Picasso and many other leading artists, but, it wasn't his ability to say to himself, "you know these paintings by Picasso are the ones that are really going to be worth something some day" that made him a fortune. Instead it was the fact that he bought everything he could, mass collections by all sorts of artists. Decades later when one Picasso turned out to be priceless, it really didn't matter if 99% of all the other paintings weren't worth very much.

Just read Ashley Biden's diary.

I'm always looking to put money in. It's coming out my ears.

Yesterday was a tiny blip that wont even matter a year from now, let alone 10. Unless you were looking to sell.

Zero risk. No ups and no downs. 5% And everyone keeps talking like it's all or nothing. I dont get it. I still have a ~75% in equities. Daily swings dont do much for me. I know it's going to keep compounding for decades. And in the next couple years I'll have less and less in individual stocks. Doesnt matter which one in the index pops, it still goes up, all without the risk and guessing.

0.4%? 5.0%. Zero risk. I'd do that the rest of my life if I could.

Murder. Youre no expert thats for sure, at even reading your own link. They ruled on a civil law dumbasss. It means parents can bring suit against them for accidentally destroying an embryo. It would be covered under Alabama’s Wrongful Death of a Minor Act. You couldn't get any dumber if you repeatedly hit yourself in the head with a hammer. Murder.

Imagine a grown asss man reading that. Must be a dress wearer.

Pouring over the border from trash African countries.