Horseman

I understand some of you dont have the bandwidth or intellect to read and comprehend the documents themselves. That's why I summarized it here for you. If you need it simplified down even more I'm sorry I cant help.

The vaccine didnt stop any of that Einstein. Despite what your masters told you. For the 1000th time: anyone with a brain knew that as soon as 9 vaccinated players on the same baseball team contracted it. Today the majority of folks understand. Then there are dudes like Squidrope.

It's called being a hypocrite. You're fine with it.

And that's it. No more documents. No Client List as I understand it. Prince Andrew and Bill Clinton will be protected. Nothing on Trump so the few lies in the media and this thread will turn as limp as Boyo's cack. Another liberal wet dream down the drain.

I found your list of Does. It's not going to be released. Further proof that articles like the one you posted are completely full of crap.

There are a dozen or so more civil suits being fought against Maxwell and/or Epstein's estate. And another possible criminal case against Maxwell for lying in the civil suit we are talking about. But this batch of documents is important because it's what lead to the criminal arrest of both Epstein and Maxwell. What you need to understand about Virginia Roberts is that she was the third in Epstein and Maxwell's triangle. She was intimately involved with them during the time period that led to Epstein's first criminal case. [Read: the time period you are interested in prior to Trump cutting ties with Jeffrey] And she wasn't the one that came forward, the Palm Beach Police Department (they had 30+ interviews of underaged victims), Miami Herald and eventually the FBI tracked her down after she just split and moved to Australia to get away from it all. Everything thing that happened subsequently relies on the base of evidence that was just released. But sure, there were more girls after Epstein's 2008 conviction because the powers that be let it continue. Here is what you need to know Boyo: Epstein & Maxwell - Guilty Prince Andrew - Guilty, at lease of molestation. Mentioned 122 times in the Prosecution's deposition of Epstein and Maxwell. Bill Clinton - Highly suspect. Documented numerous trips to pedo island and around the world with young girls/women. Mentioned 76 times in the Prosecution's deposition of Epstein and Maxwell. Everyone else is way down the list, including Trump. Trump was not on the list of witnesses. Trump was not on the list for discovery. Trump was not mentioned in the Prosecution's [read: they are the ones trying to prove guilt] deposition of Epstein nor Maxwell. Trump was only mentioned a couple times in the Defense's deposition of Richards. Richards answered that she never met Trump or saw him with Epstein. All this lead to NADA for Trump. I love this for you Boyo.

The 30+ interviewed in the Roberts v Maxwell civil suit. Since those are the documents that the news has been about this past week. Yes. I've read them all. Now what Demosthenes?

134 page prosecutor's (you know the ones trying to prove guilt) disposition of Jeffrey Epstein released today. Prince Andrew mentioned 48 times. Clinton mentioned 28 times. Trump mentioned 0 times. Jeffrey pleaded the Fifth to all questions:

Tipper and Al Gore named as being visitors to the island.

Virginia Richard Disposition concerning Clinton: Imagine if that was Trump. The internet would explode.

Just to give you all a little barometer here - the prosecution's (you know the ones trying to prove guilt) disposition of Maxwell released today is 465 pages long. Epstein mentioned 343 times. Prince Andrew mentioned 79 times. Clinton mentioned 48 times. Trump mentioned 0 times.

Fake News. A- I've read/scanned every document and haven't seen this list of 150 Does they are talking about. B - Trump has been mentioned in the dispositions - unredacted, thus, his name hasn't been redacted in favor of any Doe. What was released yesterday were several emails from Sarah Ransome, these emails were used by the defense to show lack of credibility in her disposition and to get that disposition released. These emails were to a NY Post reporter, it appears in an attempt to keep both Hillary and Trump for being elected. She's since recanted these allegations and says they were all made up. Released today, so far, was more of Virginia Richard disposition (you know the one filing the law suit) regarding Trump:

QB - Jackson, BAL QB - Allen, BUF RB - CMC, SF RB - White, TB WR - Lamb, Dal WR - Nacua, LAR TE - Kelce, KC TE - Njoku, CLE K - Fairbairn, TB K - Carlson, GB DST - Detroit DST - Miami

Same people were taking their money out of the market and threatening to moving to Canada when Trump got elected. If they had any left they probably sold at the bottom during Covid. Not the smartest group of people.

TDS Name the last time it WASN’T taken out of context.

One thing about Trump - hes a real straight shooter, honest and pulls no punches. Tells it like it is and isnt afraid to say what's on his mind. True Alpha.

Dont forget scratch golfer. Out on the links, were deals are made.

All the King's doctors couldn't put Boyo's back together again.

Police Officers > Part Time Insurance Salesmen IMO

Cowboys 27 - Chiefs 24

I think you're missing a 20:1 split in there. But it doesn't matter. Point is I wouldn't advise anyone to buy a bunch of AMZN stock today (even though I placed that same bet and won years ago) based on their past performance alone. I don't know the details of capped/scarcity. What I do know is there aren't any laws or anything else making people use it. There isn't anything keeping it from becoming antiquated tomorrow. "It has variables you cannot account for" and "Price of missing out" do nothing but throw up more red flags for me. I don't think either of us are just holding onto cash, we're putting it to work for us to try and make more cash. It's interesting that you seem to discredit the US dollar yet it is the very thing you measure the value of BTC with.

I'll just focus on the easy one: The bold isn't true. In 2018 BTC was down 70% for the year. For example. If you're talking about the average per year over it's complete history I'd point you to AMZN and many others. AMZN beats BTC over it's own history by more than 10 fold. If it's neither of those two things above then you are arbitrarily picking your data points. And past results do not guarantee future results anyway. Volatility equals risk and with risk comes reward or loss. You're speculating on what might happen - just read the last two posts between you and Cdub, it's exactly gambling.

Crypto assets or assets in general? - not insured - volatile - threat of government regulation - security - payments are irreversible - transactions are anonymous I have a very small amount of crypto, a fraction of one percent of my total portfolio, but I would fall into the category of being good on wealth - don't need bitcoin exposure. I don't even buy individual stocks anymore, zero need to gamble on a commodity like crypto.