jonmx

This stance is total BS. Do you not believe in the equal treatment under the law? Do you not believe in legal precedent? In any other circumstances, very few of these people would have ever faced charges. Maybe 10 at most. The government did not spend billions of dollars and using the majority of FBI resources in tracking down BLMers for every minor violation. This was malicious targeted prosecution with the clear intent of chilling anti-government protests. And in my honest opinion, which is supported by a ton of evidence, this was all a planned entrapment which they actually hoped was going to be far more violent than it was.

You only back the blue when they are executing their job in a proper manner. Shooting an unarmed helpless woman in the back is murder you focking moron.

Cutting off kiddies pee-pees was/is a multi-billion industry which held conferences and tracked growth and had models over how much revenue could be generated from chopping off a single pee-pee and the lifetime stream of revenue it would generate. There were over 300 clinics specializing in gender care targeting children including several major hospitals. Thankfully this practice is being exposed.

You are one dumb MFer. Not a single one of those assaults deserved more than a couple months of prison time. The 900 plus who were imprisoned for simply trespassing deserve a multi-million settlement. You are such a lying little cuck . The whole event was a setup by the FBI, Pelosi, Harris, and thr leadership of the Capitol Police. There are several Capitol Police who deserve to be in prison starting with the cowardly bastard who shot Ashli.

IMHO, this was the first real week of the bull run. Up 32% for the week and 52% for the month. I don't trade much, I just try to find the stuff I trust and hold on to avoid any short-term gains. I see BTC in the beginning of a 5x run upto $300k over the next 18 months. Loving SOL, which will do better than BTC.

I appreciate your response, but look how the thread went down. My first response to jerry: Me: These corporate monopolies have been politically targeting conservative speech (deplatforming, shawdow banning, demonitizing) and you are more worried about big corporations who are illegally putting their hands on the scale of our elections than you are with citizens being denied their freedom of speech? His: Kindly go fock yourself..... Nuanced? Go fock yourself is not nuanced, it is unhinged. Ok, so he is worried about changes to section 230. The change to section 230 Trump is proposing is to enforce the intent of the law, which was allow internet service providers protection as platform provider, instead of being considered liable as a Publisher. Google by doing stuff like proving links to Harris's campaign when people Google Trump, or YouTube hiding/shadow-banning the Trump-Rogan interview puts them acting more like a Publisher. It is not quite as bad as de-platforming Trump and banning the Hunter Laptop story as they did in 2020, but they still can't help grossly abusing the protection priviledge they were given and trying to illegally influence the election by selectively allowing/publishing content based on politics.

Hard to believe they are still counting.

Google has near complete control over as gate-keeper of information we see on the internet. Their ownership of YouTube controls the vast majority of video content watched on the internet. None of their competitors come even remotely close to competing with them in terms of market share. Corporations operate as a priviledge subject to government regulation. The protection that 230 provides them is for operating as a open platform for free speech. They are not doing that. Google/YouTube operates as the gatekeeper of information and only allow stuff which favors the authoritarian agenda of the big government/big corporation fascist agenda. Ok asswipe, why don't you actually state specifically what is wrong with what Trump said. It is 100 percent protecting free speech for citizens. Fuk you idiot. I did not even attack you before your panties got in a bind. I just explained why your position was wrong.

You are an effing bootlicking idiot. I am not OK with any censorship. So go bootlick for your big government fascist corporate bastards. Who do you think told these corporation to censor you effing ignorant brainwashed fool. .

These corporate monopolies have been politically targeting conservative speech (deplatforming, shawdow banning, demonitizing) and you are more worried about big corporations who are illegally putting their hands on the scale of our elections than you are with citizens being denied their freedom of speech?

Every one of them will be pardoned on Jan. 21, 2025.

He is going to pardon EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM! And thank God! They were the most railroaded and over prosecuted people in our nations history. Completely effing disgusting.

NSA surveillance exposed by Snowden ruled unlawful A National Security Agency (NSA) surveillance program has been ruled unlawful, seven years after it was exposed by whistleblower Edward Snowden. The surveillance of millions of Americans' telephone records first came to light in 2013. Now, the US Court of Appeals has ruled intelligence leaders who publicly defended the program lied. And Mr Snowden has said he feels vindicated by the ruling. He currently lives in exile in Moscow but, last year, expressed his wish to return to the US, where he faces espionage charges over his decision to go public. “I never imagined that I would live to see our courts condemn the NSA’s activities as unlawful and in the same ruling credit me for exposing them,” Mr Snowden said. "And yet that day has arrived," he added. Watch Advertisement NSA surveillance exposed by Snowden ruled unlawful 3 September 2020 Share Save Getty Edward Snowden wants to go back to the US but faces espionage charges if he returns A National Security Agency (NSA) surveillance program has been ruled unlawful, seven years after it was exposed by whistleblower Edward Snowden. The surveillance of millions of Americans' telephone records first came to light in 2013. Now, the US Court of Appeals has ruled intelligence leaders who publicly defended the program lied. And Mr Snowden has said he feels vindicated by the ruling. FBI worried that Ring doorbells are spying on police Microsoft bars facial recognition sales to police He currently lives in exile in Moscow but, last year, expressed his wish to return to the US, where he faces espionage charges over his decision to go public. “I never imagined that I would live to see our courts condemn the NSA’s activities as unlawful and in the same ruling credit me for exposing them,” Mr Snowden said. ADVERTISEMENT "And yet that day has arrived," he added. Allow Twitter content? This article contains content provided by Twitter. We ask for your permission before anything is loaded, as they may be using cookies and other technologies. You may want to read Twitter’s cookie policy and privacy policy before accepting. To view this content choose ‘accept and continue’. Accept and continue Top US intelligence officials had publicly insisted the NSA had never knowingly collected data from private phone records, until Mr Snowden exposed evidence to the contrary in 2013. Following the revelation, officials said the NSA's surveillance program had played a crucial role in fighting domestic terrorism, including the convictions of Basaaly Saeed Moalin, Ahmed Nasir Taalil Mohamud, Mohamed Mohamud, and Issa Doreh, of San Diego, for providing aid to al-Shabab militants in Somalia. But, on Wednesday, the Court of Appeals said the claims were "inconsistent with the contents of the classified records" and the program had violated the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. The ruling will not affect the 2013 convictions. “Today’s ruling is a victory for our privacy rights,” the American Civil Liberties Union said in a statement. "It makes plain that the NSA’s bulk collection of Americans’ phone records violated the Constitution.”

So...Snowden was a whistleblower and exposed truth.

They don't have the House so any shanningans the leftist bastards want to play is moot.

Next stop $100k BTC

I am afraid on Jan. 21, 2025 the leftist who abused citizens rights will have too many things to fear as they will be held accountable for those abuses.

I am concerned male boxers will no longer be able to pummel female boxers to death.

I am concerned we will have Congressional hearings where both sides are heard and that important evidence will not be destroyed to advance an authoritarian agenda.

The authoritarian bastards are still wondering why the garbage fascist-loving deplorables did not vote for them.

Ivan was a university professor RINO, but he really summed up Squssy here: You're arguing with a person who doesn't know what he's talking about, cherry-picks out-of-date and unreliable sources to win arguments with strangers on the internet, and would sooner eat broken glass than let somebody else have the last word even after being shown that he's wrong. Don't you have better things to do, like watch paint dry?

Blatant violation of the Hatch Act against using government resources for political purpose.

I am concerned that there will be free speech once again and I won't have government trolls censoring anti-authoritarian comments.

Tampon Tim solidified the rust belt.....for Donald Trump.

What a fascist! He is going to destroy the fundamental right of mega-corporstions and big government to censor our speech and control the narrative. This is exactly what our good authoritarian bastard friends feared most. Free speech! What an awesome speech! God Bless America! RIP the industrial-government censorship complex!