Fnord

You have said, despite being a "Christian" that Catholics, which are also Christians, are going to go to hell because it's not a real religion. I'm paraphrasing, but that was your point. You have been vocal about your sect of Christianity being the only "true" christianity. So you are ALL ABOUT judging other people's beliefs, and telling them they're going to hell. I stand by my statement. And seriously, "take it back sinner?" This isn't fuking Sunday school Shadrach.

I know you're another conservative on a board overrun by their idiocy, but you should post more. This place needs more guys like you, Jerry and Voltaire and less Whataboutadour, Eternal Cuck and Patented Philth. To the point above though: conservatives have been the minority in this country for an awfully long time based on the volume of votes for candidates of specific parties. In fact, most of the country is run by conservatives despite this reality. It's interesting that you're concerned by carving out rights for minority populations. And yes, I understand that you said "tiny minority." In your view, how are we approaching the slippery slope as we contemplate this issue? How are we carving out "new rights" and what are they?

Good question. I hope I never have to find out the answer. The reality is that if that happened our resident trans would find themselves in a fuckton of trouble. They'd be fired and prosecuted. That's not going to be of much comfort to the victim though. I'll just have to trust that she is no more prone to that sort of display than any other person would be. And I will re-emphasize: locker room integration has not been a problem, nor has this individual's "lifestyle choices." She has been nothing but respectful toward her coworkers, as far as I know.

you're pathetic. The sexuality of other posters doesn't interest me in the least, nor does your opinion of me. Just keep being consumed by typing boyosexual (the most clever thing you've ever thought of; you're so proud of it that you post it 20 times a day) and thinking that being a better candidate for evaluating Monster flavors than me is a real feather in your cap. I will never be surprised by the new lows you achieve.

I doubt EternallyStupidCuck is even qualified for this duty.

Jesus. I get where you're coming from but shockingly disagree with you. IMO in your trans example is specious. I don't think any trans people GAF about being 100% accepted, they just want to be left alone and treated with basic human respect. I believe that calling by their preferred name or pronoun is exactly that. If someone has a problem with that, it is indeed THEIR problem, not the problem of the trans individual. Here's one that will surprise you: one could look at the trans individuals themselves as oppressors to an extent. While I am supportive of trans rights like the good little mindless lib you believe me to be, I do have concerns for those whose rights are being infringed upon. You focus on men in women's sports, but I'm with Tim and consider that to be such a ridiculously small problem that it doesn't register. A bigger problem is what I have personally experienced in the workplace: a transsexual woman (biological man) using the women's locker room. Being that I work somewhere awesome with awesome employees, it hasn't been a huge issue, but the fact is that I was in a position where I had to tell a couple dozen women that they essentially had to STFU and deal with the fact that this new employee was going to be using their locker room. And while it has worked out okay, the fact that I had to do that gave me pause. No such thing as black and white. As for the Israel/Palestine situation, please. I can recognize multiple truths at the same time: Hamas is evil and should be wiped out. Not every Palestinian supports Hamas, especially the young children. Israel is perfectly justified in retaliating and me being okay with it doesn't make me an Islamaphobe. Netenyahu is a questionable leader with a scummy past that may be in the process of carrying out genocide, so maybe we oughtta look into that and make sure it doesn't happen just because "God's chosen people" are pissed off. I can support the Palestinians that are suffering and question Zionism without being antisemitic and also recognize that while I think their Muslim religion is garbage, they as humans are not. I disagree with the tenets of most religion, but who am I (and who are you) to tell someone their religious beliefs are immoral, wicked, or wrong? You're encroaching on @weepaws territory here.

Where does 0-for-60-something in the court election challenges slot into your view of the system working? Because I would tend to agree with you, that the system worked quite well at that point. Unfortunately, it broke down because Republicans no longer trust institutions, including the legal system. So a few thousand morons, egged on by Donald Trump’s inner circle (and yes, by extension Trump himself, sorry you don't believe that) decided to take matters into their own hands. Then the system held again, DESPITE the MAGA attempts at circumventing it. See, the problem we have here is that the system IS WORKING. But you all are claiming it's not because you can't admit or grasp that you support a con man, and there's no way you'll ever admit differently, no matter how many times you're shown how misguided you are. You're ready to let the country burn because you're too insecure to admit you've been bamboozled by a crook that most people saw through pretty early on. At least most people that don't exclusively consume right wing news sources, anyway.

I do. And I am registered as independent.

I dunno. You said it fist, I was just quoting you.

Never change, KD. You are a credit to MAGA.

You fist off.

What is on TV, regardless of what network or streaming service, is typically the most severe and extreme examples, especially cable news. You should not extrapolate beyond what is shown, and what you’re shown should be questioned.

Well that's different then, I suppose. I'm still not wild about it, but whatever. Still can't believe we got released early from school in the 80s and early 90s so I could attend church classes. All the non-churchy kids got to fuk off at school while I and many others were being indoctrinated. Bet they don't do that anymore.

Damn, we can't post the word c v n t anymore? Where's jonmx to fight for our first amendment rights? Sick em, terrorist!

######

Meh. The ONLY thing I agree with that ###### about is disliking Trump. She's trash.

You have a link for this? I'd like to read more about this unconstitutional activity. I don't know anyone that wouldn't benefit from a toke now and then.

It's been explained to you dozens of times. Your lack of understanding is not my problem to solve. You being convinced that you know more than the lawyers in this case would be comical if the same mindset wasn't endemic amongst those on the right. You aren't even smart enough to know what you don't know.

Which is why, despite being told a multitude of times what the crime is, you refuse to acknowledge it. You're an idiot. In your own words.

Let's face it: the women likely feel safer encountering a man dressed as a woman than either of the other choices listed.

I don't have an opinion on your question, but I will say I always try to be conscious of keeping a wide berth from women that are alone at night or somewhere remote. Especially in parking ramps. I'll even hold a door for a woman, then wait ten seconds or so if I see she's going the same way I am. Sucks you'd rather see a bear than a dude, but I get it.

This here is the guy spiking it with cybin.

I've watched more NBA this last month than I've watched in the 10 years prior. The reason it sucked for me was the super teams. You know going into any given season which 5 or so teams have a shot. Everyone else is an also ran by December. Then the Wolves finally got good, so yay NBA! I will say that since the mid 90s, which was my basketball heyday, the overall game is funner to watch now. I understand it's because teams can't hand check anymore, but if it makes the game more entertaining, is that a bad thing? I'm not a basketball purist.

Right? I drink 3-4 cups a day, if I'm drinking psilocybin coffee, work could get a bit rough. Or, maybe more enjoyable.

IIRC the Hustler lawsuits were protected as free speech because they were meant to be obviously satirical, and because no one took Hustler seriously as a news outlet. This case is the polar opposite. Fox's infotainment business model may come under some scrutiny, specifically as it relates to a show they produced about "The Trial of Hunter Biden" which included a bunch of false information. But true to Fox's MO, it was ALL presented as fact. This is all according to an article I read today. I did not watch the show.