Fnord

How is me making a statement that pollution is bad for human health a strawman? You might be the most obtuse poster here.

Ride On

Since you don't normally debase yourself by entering political threads, perhaps you missed it when a couple of this site's deplorables (including Horsemanure) had a shitfit for being mentioned in a post without being @'ed. It was "cowardly" and we weren't "saying it to their faces like a man" or somesuch pablum. I can't say whether @TimHauck was part of that little skirmish or not, but it may explain why he does it with regularity.

Link? Let's be honest here. I would prefer the option of different choices. I don't want to vote straight Dem ticket, especially given the party's current makeup and utter lack of leadership. I'm not a Democrat, and I disagree with the party on some pretty fundamental stuff. I'm comfortable with the choices I've made given my suboptimal options. I consider democracy, the constitution, and the rule of law far more sacred than I do bathroom spaces, gender identities, or the vast majority of culture war propaganda. I want my kids to have an opportunity for their lives to be better than mine. Does ANYONE believe they will be? I see what Trump is doing, and I find it highly unlikely that any of it will be beneficial to my children.

Never voted straight D, or for ANY POTUS, or for the lesser of 2 evils, until Trump came along. Fact. Want another fact? When compared with war, genocide, consolidation of presidential power, destroying the co-equality of government branches, gaslighting the American public, engaging in profiteering while in office, destruction of democratic norms, social safety nets, consumer protections, and the environment, tampons in the boys room is pretty fukking minor. You're willing to ignore all of that for dipshit talking points that make you feel better about being a lousy human. I'm very comfortable with my choices. You defend madness and authoritarianism.

Pretty sure admitting this in the GC is grounds to be called an effeminate cuck. Not by me, of course, I'm above such tawdry games. Just sayin though.

You forgot to add the projection of labeling everyone not in the throes of the real TDS as being what Donald is: a traitorous, unAmerican pedophile.

Take your own advice and just stop man. I have never cast any votes for dipshit online influencers/ attention hoors. Have you? I mean besides the guy you've voted for three times, who is the king of them, or at least pretends and wants to be. Also quit telling me what I'm aligned with. You are unqualified for it, as you are for most tasks other than "stereotypical angry old white conservative dude sky screaming on the internet."

How many credentials does one need to understand that dirty air + dirty water + dirty food = unhealthy humans? You guys keep talking about common sense, how about you display some?

Aww snap I didn't even make that connection. I have a pair of Hey Dude shoes I like a lot. They're based off of Jeff Bridges' character in The Big Lebowski. Also, people making a big deal out of these ads because they are somehow racist are idiots. I'm more than happy to discuss Sydney Sweeney's hotness levels, but refuse to entertain the notion that these are anything other than normal ad campaigns. So let's not pretend all liberals are fuming about this. It's only the ones that somehow manage to tie everything into race identity. We try not to listen to them when they get stupid.

You can claim climate change has nothing to do with human activities, fossil fuel use, farming practices, etc. I will disagree. Put that aside. Rolling back these laws and protections WILL result in more pollution and less safe water, air, and food. This is not being denied or debated. How do you envision that somehow being a positive?

Have you suddenly found yourself not needing to eat, drink, or breathe? Care to counter my assessment? "Ad hominem attacks are the first and last refuge of a limited intellect that is unwilling or unable to engage with the ideas rather than the person." - Paul LoSchiavo

FYP. You tend to do a lot of incorrect surmising.

Cool. Now we can choke on dirty air, get sick from dirty water, watch crop supplies dwindle, food insecurity increase, and really stick it to those stupid bastards that live within 30° of the equator. Kids and grandkids? Fock those little freeloaders.

Good comp, they're pretty similar physically. Jaime Pressley sounds smarter than Sweeney, but I felt like she was overrated back in the day, too.

Depends on which has a better blower.

We're gonna need a bigger thread.

Even dem tiddies? Say it ain't so! I know a few dem tiddies, and dey ain't rooned yet!

Right. Which dem's tiddies? This feels like an Abbot and Costello bit waiting to happen.

Old men skyscreaming up in here. Twatadour needs to be powered down and restarted. He's glitching pretty hard.

Christ man, whatta ya want from me? I admitted she's attractive. I just don't find her anywhere near the hottest woman in Hollywood, let alone the world. I've got a thing for intelligent women. Bltches that sound dumb are an immediate turn-off (depending on how many drinks I've sunk). She has a nice body, but I prefer women that are more voluptuous, not skinny little things. I need to not worry about breaking them when things get frisky. Tomato/tomahto, beauty is in the eye of the beholder, looks are subjective, blahblahblah

Thanks for the additional links. Several observations: Re: bolded. Who am I protecting, exactly? You always insinuate this garbage. You're projecting. You claim John Brennan was just an Obama loyalist that lied. Firstly, he was the CIA Director. That job title alone tells you that the guy knows how to lie like a professional. His counterpart for Trump, Ratcliffe, is just as likely to be lying. You ignore that fact. You also ignore that no rationale has yet been given as to why these reports were declassified, and why there is an open investigation into Brennan and Comey. What was the basis of these? Is Ratcliffe playing an even dirtier game than Brennan is accused of? I want to see these declassified reports. Who has a link to some actual text, and not some right wing interpretation of them? Both the Mueller and Durham reports had nothing whatsoever to say about Brennan's actions. You'll pardon me for trusting those reports over whatever pablum Trump's hand appointed loyalist stooge claims. They have far more credibility than him. You also conveniently ignore the many documented instances of obstruction Trump's team engaged in, detailed in the Mueller report. Why obstruct if the whole thing is fabricated? This whole imbroglio also ignores the fact that the Steele dossier wasn't the only piece of evidence used to procure the FISA warrant. It's prominence in that decision is under scrutiny right now, but it's never been contended that it was only part of the evidence considered.

When you say dem tiddies... are we talkin about AOC's? Liz Warren? Hilldog? What rack(s) do you have in mind? I mean, weird flip in conversation, but to each their own...

Holdononecottonpickinminute! Let's level set here. There are different strata of attractiveness. She is objectively attractive, and would almost certainly be the hottest chick at the bar. But there's bar hot and Hollywood actress/model hot, and she falls short of OMGSEXGODDESSHOTTESTTHINGEVER. Her face looks mildly downsy, and her eyes are weird. And she sounds vapid, especially in that AE spot. We need an Offdee scale weigh-in.