Engorgeous George

How big are your wife's mudflaps? Like african elephant ears large?

Nancy Pelosi disagrees about the ability to profit off of information.

I was addressing only the oner asked question in that post. If you rerad the others of my responses I agrere that some counts will be dismiswsed and that remittur will happen on any remaining disgorgement, if any. i had many problems with this prosecution as apparently does the Court though the latter is not certain. As for the time of the ruling i note that historically that Court is quicker than many but the issues are many so it may take time. With so few days to thre election it could well come after. I know some who follow that Court who believe it may be otherwise, but time is ticking away.

After the State's time was expired there was one question from the bench pertaining to sanctions. There was no begging from the State. I would have termed the matter a more or less collateral and insignificant issue. The discussion referenced a point in a submitted brief which I did not read so perhaps I do not fully understand that issue, but to me it seemed the Justice asking the question was referencing the States request for sanctions against the Trump team for raising again in the appeal a matter previously ruled upon. All in all I would characterize the Blogger's take on the hearing as extremely inaccurate. The State did not take hours to try to come up with arguments, explanations, or evidence to answer the Court's questions. The state got its 15 minutes of time and ran over by three minutes with the blessing and permission of the Court.

The Justices did seem to favor Trump's position. I have learned, however, to not make assumptions based upon their questioning in oral arguments. Sometimes they are playing the Devil's advocate. In this instance I tend to believe that at worst Tyrump can expect a substantial reduction in the disgorgement fine and perhaps much more. Still, I have been surprised in the past so I may be surprised here as well.

I should have found that. I was looking in the October file, not the September file. My Mistake. Thanks for bringing this to my attention.

You may, of course, be correct, but I believe the video will be posted in due course, likely Monday or Tuesday, as seems the routine.

I went to the Court of Appeals website. They have a rebroadcast feature for oral arguments. In this instance the argument in question is not yet posted. If someone has a link to the arguments, the complete arguments, i would be interested in listening to them. Maybe i will look around some more later.

I agree, which is why Trump has done fairly well thus far on his appeals. The higher courts are finding that incompetence and stupidity. This is not to say that Trump will excape in all instances, as he is arrogant and stupid and his advisors and attorneys are incompetent to the extent that he overrides their advice and gets them to do what he wants, not what they know is advisable. Trump always has been, and remains, his own worst enemy.

I agree, which is why Trump has done fairly well thus far on his appeals. The higher courts are finding that incompetence and stupidity. This is not to say that Trump will excape in all instances, as he is arrogant and stupid and his advisors and attorneys are incompetent to the extent that he overrides their adive and gets them to do what he wants, not what they know is advisable. Trump always has been, and remains, his own worst enemy.

That is a good way to avoid self-examination, but so be it. I am happy to provide amusement. Generally that is my first instinct. Sharing serious insights a distant second instinct as they are rarely well-recieved.

If he went to a public venue with the student and if he had his wife present as well, I do not find anything indicting about the act, especially if the student's parents knew or if the school principal was notified prior to the act. I guess i am saying I would want more information before I would come to conclusions in this matter.

He certainly does have quite a few, which is the basis of the claims of lawfare. Of course the other explanation for his numerous cases is he regularly steps outsides of the bounds of the law. I suspect the truth lies in a mixture of those two possible explanations.

Which simply emphasizes how little you understand litigation, attorneys, and really people.

That is my memory as well. I seem to remember suggesting that on appeal the case, or certainly elements thereo,f would be tossed and that the Court of Appeals would order the lower court to grant remittur of the amount awarded. I seem to remember Tim even partially adopting that stance and using the term remittur which I doubt he knew prior to my posting of the term and the procedure. Still, I suppose my memory might be faulty and I have him confused with someone else. I do know this, I am far too lazy to go and look for the history in that old, lengthy, thread so I will never know for certain.

Perhaps so, which is disturbing for my self-conception. At least I have David Puddy's build and Mr. Petermann's looks.

In fairness they are both obese and stupid but with an aire of entitlement born of their belief that their race puts them above criticism. Sometimes it is difficult to tell them apart. James is New York. Willis is Georgia, the one who had to take the stand to defend her hiring of her lover with tax dollars to prosecute Trump. One might have thought her office had a prosecutor capable of handling the matter better than her lover, but no

I did not know that (And still don't) I do know that 3/4 women who have slept with me turned lesbian after, so there is that.

Good info. Thanks for responding.

And how do they insure it is not contaminated debris? Watching the pictures from the wreckage it seems there is enough debris to fill 500 landfills. Where do they putn it all, and if in florida how do they insure it does not contaminate groundwater? Just wondering.

That one I do.

I believe it is caused by Halle Berry when she wears her Storm outfit.

Yes. You get a free slider if you respond to the polling questions.

One which polls the immediate surroundings of the castle.

A slalom course for inexperienced skateboarders? Cement that lacks structural intergrity?