Engorgeous George

Raising interesting questions. Do narcisists have a stronger libido? Will Trump eventually sponsor Trump Viagra, no longer a little blue pill, but a red one with Maga stamped into its surface? Is Melania eternally grateful that he no longer seeks to get up on her? It must be very disconcerting to have his hair unwind during the act and to have to wash off the orange from her skin after. My unsubstantiated theory is that it was Melania who got Stormy Daniels and Katherine Mcdougal introduced to her husband on the hope she could get out of her wifely duty.

Suspect faces DWI charge in crash that killed St. Louis cop | FOX 2 (fox2now.com) Apparently killed when a drunk and speeding driver credibly alleged to be an illegal alien lost control of his unlicensed vehicle and crashed into the Officer as he was attempting to aid a crash victim.

Credentialess foriegn invaders? Sneaky foriegn welfare seekers? Currently unprosecuted foriegn border jumpers? Timschochet's labor pool?

Run from it Timmy. Run!

Bill Clinton, by Hillary Clinton after the whole Monica thing broke, but that attempt never became public.

Maybe they could have gotten Sam Darnold for next to nothing. Vikings fans sure seem pleased right now.

Or they could have still traded Fields, not taken Williams, loaded up their lines both Offense and Defense, and have traded a 7th rounder for Malik willis, the best Willis they have had since Peter Tom Willis. (Old School call back)

Zombie Carson would be outstanding.

I bet the workers at the Hoo Ha lazer place have seen worst things than a man eating a pigeon.

He should give them back.

Tummy rubs are nice.

My wife has her car. I have a commuting car which gets great gas mileage and a truck which I use to go camping, hunting, fishing, and rafting in. I also insure the car of my youngest daughter. Likely I will sell the commuter and in a year or so ease my youngest off of my insurance as I did with her siblings previously. Probably when the rates on young drivers drop at around 25 or 26 years of age.

I have adjusted my shopping habits and have re-evaluated my insurance. Very difficult to become self-insured but i re-evaluated some risks now that i am no longer employed. eventually i m,ay decide to reduce the number of vehicles I insure. Now that I am retired it my be that my wife and I don't need as many vehicles. I don't believe grocers are price gouging. I do believe insurers use mandatory insurance requirements to cover their bad investments, but there it is. Insurers will always make money in everything but the very short term.

I have more money now than when I retired 18 months ago though I have been living on retirement savings. I even have slightly more buying power when adjusted for inflation, though not a tremendous amount. The economy has not hurt me, though i do admit to some real sticker shock at the grocery and when my insurance payments arrive.

She says it. She says "just because you legally possess the gun". That factor, the legality which she herself presumes in her statement, precludes the government from having a warrant. She is speaking generally about doing inspections of registered gun owners over their safe storage. Lawfully exercising a constitutional right means we are safe in our homes and our possessions from government intrusion. She believes otherwise. She has no understanding of, nor respect for the second and fourth amendments and one could make an argument by caselaw that by extension of the third amendment either. If elected I hope she decides to inspect your home for violations, removed matress tags, out of compliance vehicles. an air conditioner using the wrong, outlawed, coolant. I hope also that she decides to quarter in your home not just a few illegals, up to one for every 150 square foot of your home, but also a few Redcoats. She will say or do anything to pander to the group she is then presently in front of. She has no loadstone, no abidding principles. We cannot know her beliefs. We can only know that if pressed she will pander to gain and to remain in power, and that is dangerous. None of the foregoing is an argument for Trump, at least not for me. I find him unfit to be President as well. * I will entertain the argument that she does respect the Constitution but is just too stupid to really understand it, or the word "legally", or the word "sanctity", along with thousands of other words.

Her statement that the government will invade the sanctity of our homes to examine our home storage of firearms based on suspicion or paranoia rather than probable cause shows she does not appreciate or understand the Constitution. https://x.com/i/status/1836841464686424493

The problem is the track they are on is a dead end railroad spur.

My advice allows the grandparents to stop supporting the DIL during the pendancy of a protracted divorce. It brings matters to a head. As for the foreclosure sale, the grandparents can backstop the equity by bidding in the sale themselves and they apparently have the financial means to do so. My point was to force the DIL to come to terms, rapidly, on an equitable divroce, one where the outcome is more or less preknown by everybody but the dueling parties. There are no real surprises in most divorces as to property division and child custody, nor as to support. yes, there can be slight variations away from the norm, but those variations are rarely worth fighting over through attorneys as the slight wins are nearly always more than offset by the attorney fees. Protracted divorces where one side imagines a win are nearly always a mistake. OProtraccted divorces where the husband pays for the wife's obstinance is always a mistake for the husband and gives the wife leverage. The wife needs to be brought to the table. The best method for doing so is to force her to realistically examine her housing situation.

Have to be someone very proficient with a sword or katana, other weapons as well as I believe most of the contests involved weapons. Probably someone trained in Kung fu.

At the end of the game the network did the mandatory shot of Jerry Jones in the owner's box. He looked like a man about to take the loss out on the coaches.

Refs did all they could to help Dallas try to come back.

Again, the only winners in a contested divorce are the attorneys. The parties should realistically look at their finances and their assets. They should agree to an even, equitable split. They should look at the statutory guidelines in their state which are redily available and agree to abide by them as to support issues. As for custody they should agree the chjild is in the primary custody of the mother presuming she is non-abusive. They should agree the father has liberal visitation every weekend with custody. They should split custody on holidays on a rotating schedule if they cannot visit each other and be civil on holidays, and the husband should get summer custody to the extent he wants.They should file jointly and be done with it based upon their agreement because 99 times out of 100 that will be the outcome of a contested divorce but in a contested divorce attorney fees will drain the marital assets by a substantial degree. Just suck it up and split the whole pie equitably of have the attorneys take three slices of the pie and them have the parents equally divide the remainder. Their choice.

The Courts in most states will make the income earning partner, if there is only one, pay for the attorney for the other party. That is pretty standard. How does the wife oprevent the parents from ceasing to pay on the mortgage, she cannot. the court has no jurisdiction over what gifts the parents make completely gratuitously. If the mortgage cannot be kept current by the wage earner the mortgag company has every right to foreclose, and will. the court has no jurisdiction to order otherwise. As the property's equity is a marital asset it presumptively witll be shared equally but until the court rules on that the equity proceeds from the sale will be deposited with the court. the court may releawse some early to the wife against a future offset if that is necessary to keep her from becoming homeless. as for child custody during the pendency of the poroceedings the court will look to the best interest of the child. That may well be to keep the child in a stable home and school system such as apparently can be provided by the grandparents. If the mother can provide a stable and safe environment the court generally defaults to the mother in such mattersd, sexist though that may be. The father does have some leverage with cthe court on that issue if the mother is unstable, abusive, or drug dependant.

Is she profane, I don't know and don't particularly care. Is she mean to staff and disliked by those who work with her, seems to be, but again I don't really care so long as folks will work with her in spite of her interpersonal shortcomings. I do care that she is stupid, untethered to any stance or position, and clearly does not respect the Constitution. Now some may see this post and jump to a comparison with Trump, as if his many shortcomings excuse her own. They do not. I cannot vote for either of them.

That they have a union somewhat un-nerves me.