Engorgeous George

Unforgiven (1992): Why not shoot a president (youtube.com)

The Democrats have a Kamala, the Republicans, they have a Hulk. we have a hulk - Search Images (bing.com)

Hulk Hogan looked good for a man his age. Trump over selling, as per usual. Some things sell themselves if given the chance. If brevity is the soul of wit this speech was written by a nitwit. Wrap it up. Like Biden I need my beauty rest.

Apparently he is unfamiliar with the Fagina.

You have already lost.

I am advocating for a society where teachers do not conceal essential facts from parents ablout their children on the presumption that parents do not have thier child's best interests at heart or may not. I did not speak to pastors or therapists as I believe there to be legitimate reasons for those privileges. As for friends and cousins I leave that matter to their consciences. i do not want the state interjecting itself there either. The Stadte has gone too far here. Sheep will accept this, men will not.

I beliedve that is called an annoiting.

I disagree. Teachers may be confided in, but more often they are going to learn of this by observing a child interact with friends and classmates. They should be the eyes and ears of parents. Also just because children are reluctant to have hard conversations with those they love and who love them back more than life itself does not mean a child's reluctance is due to bad or abusive parenting, but rather a child's natural reluctance to disappoint a parent. For evey child supposedly protected from an abusive parent you are going to have many, many chjildren who put off extremely valuable parental support. Again, the children do not belong to the State, they belong to the parents and to their families. If the State can take the right to parent, to counsel, to guidance, to teach it can take away anything. We are individuals, not a collective which is what you are advocating.

Why is the law focused on pronouns. Itf the law was focused on other information I would address that. My point is that parents are entitled to know what their kids are up to and thinking, or at least outwardly expressing while they are kids and teachers should not be in the business of hiding information from parents about a parents child. The law presumes parents are troglodytes, that the law knows more about a situation than does the parent. It is a dangerous step towards making children custodians of the state rather than the parents.

Also, denying the majority of great and concerned parents vital information on the developmental and mental health and well being of their child on the chance that a minority of parents may not react well to the information is ludicris. We are allowing school teachers to conspire with children, by definition the immature who do not have any idea what is best for them, to keep vital information from parents who generally have their best interests at heart. If the state wants to pass a law they could insist that the information is passed on after connecting the child to relevant resources so that the state can monitor those few situations where the child may be in need of help from a parental bad reaction, but to deny the parents the right to know what is going on with their kid becasue an agent of the state feels they know better, well that is frankly where totalitarianism starts and lives. My children are mine and my wife's and their grandparents and aunts' uncles' and cousins. They are not the States.

Social Scientist call themselves that to try to cloak themselves in an aura of scientific legitimacy, but they are not scientists. They strive to use the scientific method in their infinitely multivariate analysis but one cannot control infinite variables in the social milieu. They are a mockery of actual science. They work with what they have, and I agree trying to use the scientific method is the best cahnce of coming to understanding, but believing that they actaully have done so is nothing short of ignorant. Keep arguing from authority if you like but your authorities are extremely flawed, so flawed as to have no real relevance. Cite authority on physics, math, chemistry, but not on sociology. Sociologists and physchologists are the lsot and confused grasping at explanations for their own behaviors and then trying to apply them universally so that they, themselves, can understand thier individual experience.

"Ahem. OK, here’s what we’ve got: the Rand Corporation, in conjunction with the saucer people, under the supervision of the reverse vampires, are forcing our parents to go to bed early in a fiendish plot to eliminate the meal of dinner! We’re through the looking glass, here, people."1

Why have we never shot any lions into sapce?

Real illness or exit strategy? Either way best wishes to him.

Come on! Give her a break. I bet there was a time or two when you had been drinking that you needed a hand getting your love sword sheathed in the pink scabbard.

I've sustained more serious injuries during sex. That is not, however, to negate what might have been had that bullet been an inch to the right. Rarely have I been in danger of dying during sex, well absent that one time I will not discuss here.

That would be a good thing if it meant Debbie Dunning and Diane Kruger.

Sure but what sort of narrative can be woven around her. "She stood bravely in the face of an attempted kidnaping and possible assination attempt. She has skillfully governed a state with massively disparate constituencies. She has always, as a women, been the staunchest support of a woman's right to choose." Maybe that can be sold better than Cackling Kamala. Maybe not. I still say take all the bad medicine in one big gulp. Accept the coming loss and clear the stage of both Biden and Kamala by running her. Otherwise the Democrats have to live with her in 2028, either as the nominee or as a spurned black, female nominee who loves big yellow school buses.

With all the video at a Trump rally I think there would be pictures of the teleprompter to that side immediately after the event. Also, did we not see a photo I recall being from the Times purportedly capturing the bullet and its vortex immediately after styriking trump.

They should put Kamala up as the sacrificial lamb so that they have her out of the way for 2028.

Maybe Tim was joking, though historically he is not very funny, or maybe Biden has a particulalry manly and forceful method for dialing a phone, Who knows?

Seems pretty self explanatory. Apparently it is fun to stay at the YMCA.

Kerrigan had much better legs.

I never said he was not in mortal danger. I do not believe in God. I was not complaining, I was merely noting and encouraging him to not ruin his momentum by overselling. Sadly, the real estated guy cannot help Puffing, he cannot help overselling, it is at his core who he is. If we ever meet you are most welcome to remind me, to my face, that you have posited I am human garbage.

No offense taken, but he has some clue, he knows what ears are, what they are made of, cartiledge, skin and blood vessels, and he saw pictures of the wound. Clearly he did not examine the wound, but still, he has some idea. I imagine he might argue he has a very good idea, better certainly than those who diagnose Biden based on his walk and speech and I am staisfied those diagnosis are more or less sound.