Engorgeous George

Bike ride in the morning. Go cart racing in the afternoon. BBQ dinner in the evening. Do a bit of putzing around with my RMR Storm Raft and my Kokopeli inflatible as I will be running whitewater in both this coming week and I want to inspect them before going. probably the Colorado adn the pudre with maybe the frazer thrown in as it is running high. I will be doing overnighters in Utah adn Montana this summer, details still to be finalized. I don't know how many years i have left where i will be physically able to run whitewater but I want to take what I can while I can.

Also he motivated James Harding to grow that beard.

Did I see two black guys wearing red maga hats with Trump hair sticking out of the top? I need to slowly back away.

i fully understand. I do that as well, sometimes.

I see the post was removed after further consideration revealing it made zero sense.

But if I do it I will be depriving myself.

I laughed. In fact I may not be able to see his name in print ever again without thinking of that pun.

It was you who sought direct interaction with me as I recall. I would hate to put you on ignore and miss the rich vein of humor you provide.

He is inarticulate indeed but not wrong about getting a vehicle out of power repowered quickly and back in the fight. Far quicker to gas the vehicle up rather than to recharge it. Whether this limited and specific application has wider application for civilian applications is highly questionable and I would argue it mostly does not, but he is not wrong, he is just inarticulate in teh extreme. So inarticualte that you and I both question his intelligence. I would definitely not pick him to be on my team in any intellectual contest. Of course i would not pick biden either. i would go it alone and would feel very confident of a win if they both were forced on to the other team as I know they would outburst with the wrong answer rather than allow the intelligent team captain to respond.

If you think she's funky put a rain coat on your monkey.

https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/relatedvideo?q=video+of+a+duck+pull+toy&mid=15AA917C110B40568B9415AA917C110B40568B94&FORM=VIRE Also not a duck. In reviewing legislation the first question the Supremes have to ask is whether congress had the right to legislate in the area. The second question is whether they passed constitutional legislation. The third question is whether that legislation was exclusive and exhaustive on a subject or whether it was general so as to include new cases or examples appropriate for inclusion in a nonexhaustive category. Sotomayor ignored the third question. She determined that an exhaustive definiton was open to inclusion of matters she felt the legislature might have included had they left the definition open and nonexhaustive becasue she feels they might have. That is patently inappropriate review.

I doubt it. You are persistent and will seek to see that brand. No matter. As I do not respect your opinion I do not care what it is or how you comport yourself. I will be the same. Check my pulse It don't cahnge Stqays 72 Come shine or rain

https://www.sportsmans.com/hunting-gear-supplies/decoys-calls-scents/decoys/duck-decoys/c/cat100370 Those are not ducks.

I understand you are far too stuborn to change your view regardless of it being based on a misunderstanding of what a Supreme Court review ought to do. You opine on legal matters without understanding them. To you the only metric which matters is the outcome. You have every right to your opinion. You have every right to wear your ignorance as a badge. I salute you and your badge. Knockin' on Heaven's Door (Live at Madison Square Garden, New York, NY - January 1974) (youtube.com)

I seek nothing in your eyes.

So those who desire dominion over my language and so my thought maintain. I do not cede that power to you or to them. If you seek power over me you need to do better than that.

We repelled Frank N Furter back in the 70's and we will repel this new onslaught, just you watch.

Was it painful, hsving your vaginoplasty?

I would like to see her moons.

Milwaukee is a hole, Wisconsin should cede it to Illinois and annex the U.P.

We already have a place for this, It's called Ru Paul's Drag Race.

So you have got that going for you, which is nice.

Your choice of grammer pronouns are I, You, He, She, and It. As this individual does not qualify for any of the other pronouns the correct pronoun to use is It. How could anyone vote for It? Now the politicalloy correct mob will insist it is demeaning to use grammar properly. I ignore them. They don't have the right to redraw language as some attempt to force compliance with their beliefs. They argue I hurt the feelings of the individual who would like to be percieved as they wish to be percieved. Franklyu if my opions damage someone else's self worth or self esteem I am not the problem, thier oversensitivity and lack of self confidence is. That is an internal matter to them, not an external matter.

If so I am completely out of touch with the cost of this kind of thing. I would think $1000 plus her sccess to celerbrity when she is with him would be more than sufficient.

You need know nothing more to form your opinion. Writing legislation, however, requires much more, it requires knowledge of the subject. For years you have sought ignorance on the subject of firearms, a subject you could ahve mastered by now if you had simply processed the information shoved before you in these forums, yet you have refused to do so. You could have taken a course in firearm handling, safety and use yet you chose not to so that you can argue from ignorance. it would seem anyone so passionate about a subject might spend a bit of time and energy acquainting themselves with the subject, but you, you tout your own ignorance. Your persistence in doing so, is, however, admirable. Persistence is a great trait. Unfortuantely persistence without a plan is simply the yipping of a lap dog.