Engorgeous George

For average fellows like you and I it would probably be paying off strippers or crack whores, potentially even babysitters, not porn stars.

I've asked before and I'll ask again, not as some sort of "gotcha" but as i truly don't know and have not had it articulated yet to me, what was the falsification? If "legal fees" or "legal expenses" was false what should it have properly been denoted? Are there predefined and listed categories? If so into which category should this ahve been denoted on the memo line of the check? Did the designation change tax or licensing payments due the City or the State of New York?

Yes Trump was. Frankly I do not understand how so many republicans have sold their party for this huckster.

Being, as I am, unfamiliar with teh full Happy Days catelog did this episode air before or after he jumped the shark?

Historically he was a darling of the left. He and the left started diverging a decade or so ago. Was it he who swung right, they who swung much further left, or a combination of the two, who can say? I happen to believe it was a bit of both though others may have a different view. Clearly the last year or three I would categorize him as being in the camp of the right.

That's good of you. I believe in this case you may also be advocating for some of the lassies

I do not. Whether it jives with his very specific listening audience which is a specific subset of college graduating women is another matter. It does not upset me that there are a variety of opinions in the world, a variety of paths, so long as one does not interfere with my path. Dude was like Hhey, look at this path over here. I bet many of you re excited about walking down this path." I don't see how that upsets those intending to walk another path.

I would venture to guess that more than 9 out of 10 persons posting in this thread had a mother.

I find the calling to motherhood, to shaping the next generation among the highest callings. We pretend to venerate teachers, nurses, caregivers, nurturers, well mothers are all that and more. Holding them in veneration does not seem an outrage, at least not to me, especially very near mother's day.

I am not certain I should be included in "you people" since I am not a believer. that said he was invited to address a specific audience and he did with beliefs consistent with their own. His views arer not mainstream orthodoxy, but I thought they were at least in the acceptable range for the mainstream, at least as talking points, as one possiblitity. it seems now that this is not so.

I don't have the panache to pull off that wardrobe. I wonder if that is a requirement or if a bit more pedestrian lawyer dress would suffice.

Have you considered a custom chair?

Well I am a private person so the media frenzy when it all blows up would not have been to my liking. Still, there must be many such lawyers who remain in the shadows, unknown to the public at large but known to those who my need them. You know, professional and discrete skank outbreak suppressionists. Yep, I definitely think asw a second year elective skank suppression would have beaten trusts and estates or commercial paper.

Superior or the right choice for some, maybe. had he said or intimated it is the superior choice for all I might see the outrage, or at least some consternation, but he stopped short of that as i read his words. maybe I just did not appreciate the subtle implications of his words.

Guys, potentially yes. Certainly for hopping on McDougal. The question is business associates, lending institutions, country club circles of friends includingpowerful wives of his friends, assuming he has friends. It is a fine line between playboy and skank banger. Stormy was clearly on the wrong side of the line.

I was unaware when I finished law school that one could go into skank law. My classmates and I chose prosecution, defense work, tax law, civil litigation and other practices, but skank law was not among them. Apparently though there are many lawyers like Avenatti and Cohen who were aware of the specialty and went into it. Who knows, I might have enjoyed that practice. I should have visited all of the booths at career day insted of cutting the day short to go out into the aprking lot and getting drunk, again.

I doubt he has been in physical contact with Melania since Baron was concieved and for all I know that was an in vitro job. I doubt she cares at all. She is nothing more than a beard, like Tom Cruises wives.

The man spent a lifetime developing a brand, the Trump brand. Now I happen to find his brand cheesy and gauche but that is neither here nor there. He determined his dalliance with a skank porn star would be deleterious to his brand, both business-wise, political ammbition-wise, and personal reputation-wise. He was lawfully entitled to pay to keep the incident from getting to the public eye. The question is whether he did so in the lawful manneers available to him. He did not use campaign funds so that is a good start. If he used strictly personal funds that would have been fine. It seems he mayn have used business funds and N.Y. has some reporting requiremnts for business expenses. Those requirements seem to be for tax and licensing purposes though that is a bit unclear to me. As such expenses need to be categorized, not for campaign finance purposes but for tax purposes. There seem to be a finite number of reporting categories. There being none for paying skanks to remain quite the trump Corp chose legal expenses. Seems sort of reasonable. Maybe they should have chose marketing, presuming such a category exists as this was marketing.

I don't understand the outrage over one person's opinion expressing a viable option for some, not all.

Henry Hawk Kid had a lot of heart.

Raymond J. Donovan

Third base.

What sort of sorry transcription servicve worked on the second video. He clearly states "just after I signed the packackalac act into law,", not that jumbled mess represented on the video.

The weather is still fairly pleasant there in May. Nice night time breezes.

Imagine, a Presidential candidate doing everything in his power to color how the voters will percieve him in an upcoming election.