Engorgeous George

As I understand matters the judge has stricken some of her testimony and he, himself, the judge has interposed objections to other parts of her testimony. If so, this simply confirms what I wrote this morning, her testimony is irrelevant and likely to be highly prejudicial and this was foreseeable yet the judge allowed the testimony to be solicited. This should have lead to a mistrial. It will lead to reversal on appeal. The court and the prosecution are now engaged in a pointless exercise and they have to know it. Both should be sanctioned when this is over as the court process is punishing and expensive and should not be used solely to be punishing and expensive. Both the Court and the prosecution have an obligation to see that the process not continue for the sole end goal of having the process be punishing. This is shameful and will be seen in the future to ber so. It will be taught in law schools as an example of what not to do.

Like orca fat? https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=45dd26ae0b8a152aJmltdHM9MTcxNTA0MDAwMCZpZ3VpZD0xZTgzYWM4Yy1mZTBmLTY2NGUtMTc3Mi1iZWVhZmYzNTY3MDYmaW5zaWQ9NTUwMA&ptn=3&ver=2&hsh=3&fclid=1e83ac8c-fe0f-664e-1772-beeaff356706&psq=like+orca+fat&u=a1aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cueW91dHViZS5jb20vd2F0Y2g_dj1haDVTekk1RjhnOA&ntb=1

I get that you do. And I think her motivation, while interesting and potentially titillating is irrelevant to proving the charges, from a legal perspective and standard that is. What I think does not matter at this point as the judge has apparently ruled. What I think may matter at an appellate stage but not right now, not in the face of the court's ruling.. When I tried cases I tried to protect ther record from appeal. I wanted to win and to have the win hold up. This prosecution team and this judge seem to me unconcerned with protecting the eventual verdict on appeal, presuming they get a verdict.

Well off to do my morning routine. it will be interesting to see the developments on this when I get back in 3 or 4 hours. I imagine the Trump "walk out" news conference for lunch will be interesting.

Whether she accepted it or not is irrelevant. Whether it was made or offered, and from which funds, and with what intent is relevant, if one believes the charges, but her state of mind is irrelevant.

No, I see the point of the trial, I was simply noting what I see as yet more reversible error by the judge. Just another log on that fire.

Maybe they will. maybe, before buying a dog folks who have heard his perspective will wonder whether keeping a dog in the city is a wise choice.

As I understand coon hounds their bark is literally designed to be such that one can locate that dog, in the dark of night, as it has gone far afield chasing and eventually treeing raccoons. It is designed to carry.

I fail to see the relevance regarding how she felt about having sex with Trump.

If your neighbors also have 45 acres I am guessing barking is not an issue.

Does your dog do their barking from the middle of the 45 acres or does it go to the property line/fence line and bark directly at your neighbor?

I must have missed this, what with the IDF warning folks and moving them from the battlefield and holding up their attacks to allow relocation nholds which then have made their attacks more difficult, even costing tghe IDF lives as H+amas is given time to regroup. Interesting in that the IDF has worked around Hamas using Palestinians as human shields. Still, I don't follow matters therer as close as many so you may be right.

So one of those friendly, non-violent wars. Seems antithetical from the folks that brought us October 7, but O.K.

Biden is a congenital idiot, a plagarizer, a pathological liar, and an opportunist with no abiding principals as any positions are subject to polling changes. He is not qualified to run a lemonaid stand. All that said he may be more qualified than Trump.

I did not appreciate the depth oif your dispair on this issue until I read this.

I hope the porch pirates don't get her.

I'll take Anastasia from kiev, please.

Must have been a stand alone freezer. The ones incorporated into refrigerators would no way hold more than two newborns.

What body part would you suggest they worship at?

Did we learn nothing from Don't Mess with the Zohan?

If the woman becomes a problem simply excuse yourself to do your business and then don't return. A single can of beer is too little recompense for turning ones back on Margot Robbie. Now a couple of cases of beer after Margot has been without soap, shampoo, deoderant a razor and a douche for a few days, well no question which way I am going then.

Case specific, what kind of beer and how much? A beer implies generally a single 12 ounce bottle or can. Also depends on the woman. There is a broad range between Rosie O'Donell and Margot Robbie.

I'd incinerate that raging vase of herpes as the first thing I would do.

10 is what, 4th grade. Seems to me 4th grade was around when interests in such matters became more insistent, at least for me. Would I mention that to a current parent and then postulate that the parents kid watches porn, no, but might that be true if the opportunity presented itself, yeah it just might be. Still, I agree with you that some subjects, some accusations ought to be off base. Very bad taste to drag a guy's minor children into matters.

Well that is distasteful.