Engorgeous George

My response: Dear Diptsh!ts, food, water, medical services and basic hygiene are provided on this campus at designated facilities such as the residence halls, cafeterias, and gymnasiums. If you want food and watefr go there. BTW, be aware that were we of the mind to cater to you obnoxious self entitled brats we would coordiante that response out of the very building you are occupying and destroying. Given that, piss off on your demands for services.

I fail to see the connection between suing Fox news and opening oneself up to a suit from Trump. What am I missing? How does the one opne up the possibility of the other.

Did I say that? Did I even remotely intimate that? I was just taking a moment to find some levity in a tragedy. You might try it. Doing so gives me the strength to go on.

Expel the protestors who have occupied and damaged buildings. Freeze their transcripts and do not certify their credits for transfer. Notify all loan companie/r entities the former student is not making progress towards their degree and that the loan should be called. Publicize that is what you are doing.

I am not sure I was backing or supporting your point, but O.K.

I seem to remember seeing pictures of embryos at every week of development. They were compared and contrasted to the development of an embrionic pig to show the lack of appreciable differentiation for several weeks. Pretty sure this was in 4th grade where I first saw this.

The Ukrainian Farmers Tractor Corp proved more powerful than anticipated, towing all of those tanks right out from under the Russians. Sadly they seem to have become ineffective as of late as I have not heard of a successful theft of a Russian tank in well over a year.

They need to turn off the internet in that building and to find a way to block phone signals from entering or leaving. Make it a giant faraday cage. Then turn off electical power and land phones. They won't last two hours.

No Timmay, you are not.

Lots of fatherless kids this morning. I presume the Tunnels to Towers foundation will be getting involved.

I have found in life that those things which are statistically unlike to happen which are good do not happen, but those things which are statistically unlikely to happen which are bad happen all the time. Why is that?

At gun point? Seems unlikely, but O.K. Care to share the specifics?

Bring in cops and national guard. Surround the occupied building so none may leave. (Nows youse can't leave) Clear the protesters from the occupied outdoor spaces first. Arrest, identify, expel, and prosecute them for any crimes they have committed. Then force entry to the occupied buiding being sure to keep it surrounded so the rats cannot flee the sinking ship. Arrest, expel, and prosecute them fully. Revoke any student visas. Immunity? In a pig's ear.

Apprehended, sure. Charged with every crime they committed and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, sure. Mowed down, implying killed or physically maimed and disabled, no, though treated bruskly, fine.

I only support nipple pinching from one's peers, which I will define as no more than 18% older or younger

Its been 32 years now since Daryl Gates was Chief in L.A. Time to put away the narrative from 3 decades ago. If matters are as Tim alleges they are the LAPD would be under several federal consent degrees right now. To my memory it has been around 15 years since they last were under a consent decree, one which lasted a dozen years.

Sounds like there is lucrative practice to be had in Los Angeles suing LAPD.

Should be interesting. Justice Brennan wrote a good, even great opinion in N.Y.Times v. Sullivan. His opinion protected free speech, even wrong and stupid speech against public officials to the maximum. They had to prove actaul malice. The opinion also laid the ground for defanmation suits by those who, while not elected officials, have thrust themselves into the public arena, into the lime light. They can sue but in some ways they are public figures and subject to greater scrutiny in defamation cases. As I recall Curtis (sp?) Publishing v. Butts expanded on that. Most of the litigation in this area has actually been not elected offiicals but public figures, stars, often stars who became tabloid fodder. Interesting whether hunter is a star, a public figure (I think so) and whether Fox is a tabloid (???)(Muckrackers have been given protection by the courts. Throwing muck on public figures may be the official American pastime, more so than overeating and watching sports)

Biden does the walk, but whenever Trump is filmed from behind he looks like he is carrying around a load back there. I think on this metric there is little to separate the two.

Sure he may occassionally have a loss of sphincter discipline, but who would'nt with his Big Mac diet plan for breakfast, second breakfast, lunch, dinner, supper and lights out meal.

Biden could have named that tune in one not, "Don"t!"

I imagine a google search would have to be quite specific what with all his cases across so many jurisdictions. I know he made such a motion in the documents case and in the Georgia case.

And though I have not followed the matter closely i believe they dfid and the judge denied it. I thought Trumps lawyers sought an interlocotory appela on that issue and were denied, not on the substance, but denied being able to present it. That said I have not folowed the matter closely and certainly could be wrong as to the motions Trump's team has filed.

I was served dog in the Phillipines. That was prior to the 1982 legislation, though i believe my wife's family did not give a good god dam about that ordinance or subsequent legislation.

No, i am saying that summary judgment is not the proper motion. They can make motions to dismmiss, they can make motions for directed verdicts at the appropriate time, but summary judgment assumes the facts in a civil case are not in dispute adn it is a request for the Court to apply the law to those undisputed facts.