Engorgeous George

I think he admitted to believing that star status is consent. That would not be my understanding of the law. Where is that interview from? Oh, i see, MSNBC braodcasting a depo from the E. Jean Carroll matter. Too bad for Trump he is incapable of admitting when he is bragging or using hyperbole. Had he simply said he was being a big man for the interview and he neverf actaully treated women with such disrespect it would ahve gone a long way. Sadly, his ego gets him into trouble and prevents him from getting out. He is an insecure man under all the narcissim.

One of those criminal case summary judgments. Tnbose are so rare as to be nonexistant. Or perhaps the are rare becasue the motion is only a civil action motion.

No, according to me context matters and people need to be accountable for their own behavior. According to you a person's color defines the interaction.

Still, she's hot for a lady her age so in FMK I say F then K but definitley not M.

As for Kristi Noem, her inability to have foreseen the outrage, manufactured or not, calls into serious question her instincts as a politician. Any farm or ranch raised kid understands fairly early that city folks do not understand our relationship with animals, or even their own since they are removed from their food production. She was stupid to believe this was a relatable story, just foolish.

Well I would not agree it takes until 14 months or more to adequately train a dog. In my experience basic commands ought to be mastered by 12 to 14 weeks. More complex behaviors and reactions such as proper hunting techniques or assistance dog training can take up to a year and in some highly specialized working dogs for detection or tracking and recovery a bit more, but basic behavior commands, come, sit, stay, heal, those should be solid at 12 to 14 weeks.

In my experience ill behaved dogs are dogs which have not been sufficiently and consistently trained by their owners. There may be some dogs who are simply beyond training, which are just addled from birth, but I have not encountered them.

The protesters have, as one of their goals, to get arrested. It is all part of the concept of civil disobedience. Given that is their goal, and given that the police response is more or less a known, when the protesters get arrested or cleared from an area it is not accurate to say the police instigated the force or violence. The protesters knowingly set a chain of events into action. They are the instigators. They got what they desired,

To the best of my recollection of the facts of the case I would agree with that characterization of Mr. Jean, yes.

https://youtu.be/FmO13M8AF_Y

I am looking for something more than completely unsupported supposition based upon the outcome of a white officer killing a black suspect, yes. Would it have to be an admission by the officer, a very unlikely scenario, no it would not, but I would want something more than just the outcome. Maybe some history of animus against blacks. Maybe some racially charged statement just prior to the shooting or suffocation, maybe membership in a racially charged organization, something.

Black and gunned down, yes, but gunned down for being black, that seems an unsupported supposiiton. Maybe he was gunned down for being male. Maybe he was gunned down for surprising the officer and race and/or sex had nothing to do with it.

Hmmm, Sam Briton or Kristi Noem. I'll take Kristi Noem, thanks.

Sarah Palin backed aerial hunting of wolves. Why do hot republican governors like shooting canids?

It didn't hurt Atticus Finch's reputation to shoot a dog. I guess Gov. Noem is no Atticus Finch. Of course Atticus shot a rabid dog.

I think you have gotten stories conflated. Trump has a mushroon d1ck, not a tater one.

Well semi-secret anyways.

But he is not arguing for it using a double negative.

Indeed. So I have read, though I suspect rather than becoming desensitized they became aroused.

A mistake I have made myself, and more than once.

Wrong thread.

Seems to me the stock has been volatile and is risky and seems wholly unconnected to its inherent value. I think of myself as having a high tolerance for risk, but this stock exceeds my tolerance level.

If you want to curtail these types of encounters you ought to teach black youths to submit peacefully to arrests, not to freak out, argue, resist, or cry out for help when they are not in distress but they foolishly think that escalating the situation will inure to their benefit. Teach these black youth to submit and to follow directions while their friends film the encounter and call a law firm they have already vetted and have in their phones, a lawfirm that deals with criminal defense and civil rights litigation. Propagating the myth of institutional racism only leads to ignorant and counterproductive responses to police encounters. Some here support creating the myth that most encounters will end badly which results in behavior that leads to bad outcomes. I submit the Tims of the world cause more harm than good. Well intentioned ignorance often does.

You have to marinate them to tenderize them. Still they are a bit stringy and need a bit of salt. They make a good adobo.

What if the experience of LEO is that nealry all of their black arrestees since George Floyd immediately go to the "I can't breath" gambit?