Engorgeous George

I find the argument that the Iranians did this as a face saving measure interesting. The argument seems to be they wanted to show they can act forcefully while the argument also goes that they intended no actual damage.Tthis was all for show. Well they did demonstrate they can launch vehicles. And it is true there was little damage this time. My question though is how does it save face to show the world and your closest allies that you are totally ineffectual? How does it save face and make you appear strong to demonstrate that your weapons cannot reach their target? There seems to be a collateral argument that we Americans have shown our strenght by not responding. Well we have shown that strength well over 100 times since this present hot conflict started and all that has done has lead to more attacks.

His next admonition of "don't" will be whispered, for emphasis.

The Frankie Five Angels dodge. I like it.

His next admonition of "don't" will be whispered, for emphasis.

As we speak the Biden Administration is drafting up operation Corn Pop. He is going to stride into Iran wielding a length of chain and will challenge the Ayatollah but only after apologizing for calling him Ester Williams.

He told them Don't.

I can't believe they did this after shooting at us over a hundred times recently with nary a whimper from us, and then just this week Biden telling them 'Don't!' What were his other 'Don'ts' I forget. Don't attack us as we pull out of Afghanistan, Don't invade Ukraine, Don't cut social security, and this recent one.

Really? You actually believe this don't you?

I pretend to no expertise or insight on money matters, just what I have observed more or less from the sidelines as I went about trying to accumulate enough wealth to secure my family after I retired and eventually die. I would have been well advised to learn more over the course of years but I lacked interest and appreciation for the subject. That said, blatant untruths are apparent even to boyos like me and Beachguy has some whoppers.

BTW, I enjoyed watching the markets advance in January and February, as for the latest retreat, not so much. I just would not tout the economy on a week where the markets tanked and inflation figures rose and where mortgage rates increased. i would prefer the president concentrate on Iran right now as any widening of the conflict over there could devastate the oil markets and this time the President will not be able to draw from our stategic reserve since he already played that card.

I believe stores are discriminating against the disabled. Do you know how hard it is for the disabled to participate in looting? The stores ought to provide them accomodations, easier access, assistgance getting items off the shelves, and favored parking.

How does one bully the Fed? How does one destroy the supply chain. I can see presiding oiver budgetary allocations which ignore infrastructure but that is a passive act, not an active one like destroying something, and the President has little say over the budget congress passes. As for contributing to inflation within 3 months of getting into Office he may have done so by signaling to the capital markets his intentions when it came to oil production in this country which had economies in the Dakota, Montana, Wyoming, and western Colorado doing extremely well. Maybe not. I am told presidents have little to do with economic trends, but I notice how swiftly the markets reacted negatively this week to a small bit of bad inflation news and Biden pronouncing his stance on the matter.

Whern I learned ablut adverse possession there were 4 criteria. The possession had to be open, notorious, adverse, and under claim of right meaning some title. These squatters are not there under any legitimate claim of right . They manufacture a fraudulent claim. The adverse possession concept was based un mistaken claims of right, not fraudulent ones.

I want both drug tested and hooked up to a lie detector projected on a screen behind them during the debate. Both are habitual liars, of course, but this may favor Trump as he is the embodiment of the George Costanza aphorism, "it's not a lie if you believe it". Also, for every ten lies told they get a rather substantial electrical shock to their genitalia. Again this may favor Trump as he probably pays for that type of action when he visits the :Philippines, but still, it would be fun to watch his facial expression when it happens.

Trump testifying as to his intent and stating that folks less than competent misinterpreted his directions is his best chance at acquittal, in my estimation. Of course he would have to be at least minimally persuasive so as to raise reasonable doubt in one juror at least, and he would have to not go off script with whatever brilliant idea (actually stupid, case torpepoing idea) he has while on the stand. Testifying is his best hope but it is also nearly certain to sink him as his ego cannot be held in check, and his ego is the dumbest Martha Focker on the planet.

Skol you bunch of vegan substitute quiche eating pussies. Meanwhile the Packers and the Chiefs now require season ticket holders to order a side of beef with their tickets and other ticket holders to consume a pound of animal flesh in sight of security or they will not be admitted on their ticket.

And when they claim they have a lease and produce a bogus document the police may well refuse to intercede saying it is a matter for an eviction in civil court or a suit to quiet title, time consuming matters. The cops will not want to determine the credibility of the squatters lease while on scene as that is a matter for a court.There will then be a police report writen up and filed which states you were told to go to court and to not resort to self help as the squatters are in possession of the property. If you do then resort to self help the squatters will have a strong case against you. Better to not contact the police. Better to turn off the water and power and to hire a brute squad to provide security while you forcibly dispossess them and secure the property with new locks all around and new garage door codes if the squatters have found a remote. If the squatters call the police be prepared to answer the door from inside the house showing you are in possession. Show the water bill, gas and electric bill in your name and any billing for other systems like security or lawn maintenance. If you are making mortgage payments show reciepts for your last 12 payments and have the phone number of your mortgage company handy so the cops can call them if they wish. Make sure all of the possessions of the squatters are already put out onto the curb by some beefy movers before the squatters can call the cops. Tell the cops the squatters story confuses you, you don't know what they are talking about but don't squatters usually at least wait for a house to be empty before they try to abuse the landowner and the law? Regardless you don't want these apparent squatters on your property nor their stuff on your property. Have a garbage company prepared to come by 24 hours after the property of the squatters is put out on the curb to remove the items. Document that passage of time so you have not removed the items from the curb adn to the dump prior to 24 hours. Let the squatters know their items will be removed to the dump if they don't move them. Call your local action news team to report a bunch of squatters trying to dispossess you of your property. Let the action news team know the matter is taking place right then and that it has a potential to become violent making good video copy. Have a neighbor repeat the call. Don't be afraid to rent some guard dogs for a week or two after to prevent the squatters from trying to come bck for revenge. Do all of this at essentially the same moment. It is a blitzkrieg action we are looking for. Don't let the squatters know what hit them. Squatters win when you incrementally try to remove them. They are not prepared for the blitzkrieg.

My favorite memory from the Minneapolis riots was a reporter doing a standup back lit by fires of business burning to the ground after having been looted. The reporter was commenting on the mostly peaceful crowds who had their moment mared by a few bad apples. As the reporter was selling that tripe a person walked through the back of the shot. That mostly peaceful person was carrying an ax. The reporter was blissfully unaware of the irony having not seem the person, or so it appeared.

Super heavyweight.

All they had to do is to remain silent.

Weepaws-reading with no comprehension.

Remove the ham from Hamas. Maybe isreal can accept Koshermas.

I was surprised to see this was a bout a female. Probably reflects my inherent sexism.

The media have long since abandoned any ethical tenants of journalism to become acolytes for one side or the other. I cringe when they pretend otherwise. They pretend to some superiority from their constitutional mention in the freedom of the press, but just as free speech is subject to much abuse which must be tolerated to protect speech as a whole so too must shoddy, partisan spewings be tolerated to protect actual journalism.