Engorgeous George

He should have proposed stazrting with 4 10's, then after a year or two reducing to 4 9's, then again 4 8.5's, and finally 4 8's. Incrementalism. Get that camel's nose in the tent. a guy with bernie's nose should appreciate the concept.

I like the cut of your jib. I like my coke with cognac, my shrooms with a good single malt, and my pot with an ice cold beer. Peyote I refrain from drink, and acid, well its all good then.

If the thieves enter your home, grab your key fob, and then decide they might be up for a bit of a rape do the Toronto police also advise that you and your spouse strip off your britches and await the intruder butt up on your bed?

Later, three feet of snow to clear.

I predict hubris will, ironically, trump integrity. I predict Ms. Willis will try to remain on the case and will excoriate the judge to her, and his, constituency. That will be the great irony. The judge will have tried to pander here to his constituency and she will use his ruling to poison him with that constituency.

I believe anyone prosecuting an ex-President and a current candidate for that office needs, like Ceasar's wife, to be above reproach. Ms. Willis clearly is not. She ought to have the integrity or the shame to step aside.

He tried to walk a line.

I think we can now anticipate interlocatory appeals and attempts to make referrals to the Bar or the Supreme Court of Georgia, (depending on how Georgia licensure works).

i have expressed my belief earlier in this thread that it was shameful the deference the judge paid to Ms. Willis when she was on the stqand. He, in my mind, abdicated his judicial control and responsibilites to her allowing her to be both nonresponsive and rambling and self serving while she testilied on the stand.

I would not have ruled as has the judge so if I seem to defend the judge's opinion by merely explaining it, as I understand it, please don't assume I agree with the explanation. i merely respond bercasue you have asked. The judge has made the determination that there is an appearance of impropriety and not an actual direct conflict or impropriety, though he acknowledges there was some testimony or evidence that could be interpreted that way. He maintains that the appearance can be remedied, moving forward, by the removal of one or the other. A case can be made that this is true and that without hard evidence of a conflict this is sufficient remedy. My question is if the apparance was based on prosecutorial animus, an improper prosecutorial motive, how can the appearance ever be removed without Ms. Willis being disqualified as she advertised her animus. I believe the judge concentrated only on the relationship and not on Ms. Willis' statements. he got to the statements later in his ruling but he seemed to ignore the nexus between her animus and her control of her lover who was and maybe still is prosecuting. I think Ms. Willis has to cut Mr, Wade loose as that is one option available to her and with the judge's previos ruling that some of the counts were incompetently pleaded that is an easy out for her, but what then will Mr. Wade do? If his reputation is left in taters will he stilll stand by thier story or will he turn on her?

I am unfamiliar with Georgia practice and am too lazy to look it up now, but I wonder what the stgandard is for referal to the Bar for sanctions. I am particularly interested in Mr. Wade and his partner who, though they had an obligation to not appear before Jude Willis, nor to represent clients charged by D.A. Willis as that would be an impermissable conflict of interest both indicated an uncertainty as to when the relationship began. No responsible lawyer and no responsible law practice would be uncertain as to that fact as it is essential in doing a conflict analysis before accepting clients. They had an obligation to make that fact clear in their minds. They lied, or alternatively they are guilty of malpractice thjrough incompetence. They should answer to the Bar and frankly their insurers ought to carefully consider whether to continue their coverage. As for Ms. Wade the judge may be correct. There is stink, and where there is stink therer is often sh1t, but not necessarily so, so she skates for now unless Wade or his partner turn on her or other evidence comes to light.

Change women's events to the event plus menstration. Sure the final outcome may not be determined for a month but it would eliminate this silliness. Now, admitedly this will not work for prepubescent or post menopausal women so maybe it can be modified to ovarian confirmation.

23 pages. a pretty quick read.

Dutch Apple

I burn under a 40 watt bulb unless it is soft light, and even then I need SPF 100.

She's showing her age a bit like Michelle Malkin before her.

Will he Q.B. while he runs, and if so will he have secret service protection in the pocket?

Both screw up your bowling game. The first gets your grip just slightly off and the second effects your stance as you address the pins. Is it really worth sacrificing 20 pins off your average?

Do you know why divorce is so expensive? Because it is worth it.

That is a powerful coalition. Is it 51% of the electorate, possibly.

My divorce was fair. We had two things to show for our marriage, my assets and her debts. The judge divided them equally giving us each one thing. I got the debt and she got the assets.

I find it inappropriate for you to use the phrase widespread in a thread about women history month. Sure some made history that way, but we are trying for a higher form of dialog.

America is all about speed. Hot, nasty, bad-ass speed.

It is possible you are mutating into something new, something apparently fit, but as we have seen in the movies and comics you may be only moments away from your final metamorphsis into something truely evil. Stop now. Seek help. Listen to your woman who has been warning you of the impending changes before it is to late and you have her bound and gaged in revealing clothing in an old abandoned factory you are retooling for your nefarious purposes.

If their sales drop how will we as a society dispose of the toxic and hazardous waste we have been mixing in with their food?