Engorgeous George

But they do pull up multiple sites for Ramen Noodle.

Well sure, that's what they would say, but what ablout Duck, Duck, Go. what can they tell us about this?

Illegals flooded in with no effort to interdict them and no vetting whatsoever. Coming in there was no process because liberals wanted no process to slow the dreams of both themselves and the migrants. Now, on the way out there has to be vetting, due process, and that is correct, it is our system, but the asymetrical nature of proces and effort required between entry and deportation show a breakdown in the system. The system can be overwhelmed and it was intentionally so, and even evilly so by progressives. There is one lesson from all of this. We absolutely need to diligently, and even brutally and ruthlessly protect our border because once these illegals get here they take an inordinant amount of effort to get rid of. They are like squatters or ex-wifes. The next time a Tim tries to argue we shold let them in, push back since the cost of momentary humanitarianism is a world of legal cost when they turn out to not be worthy of the human dignity they were presumptively afforded. I am tired of shields being forged into swords. I am tired of being abused for my tolerance. I am tired of non-citizns and non-contributors demanding more of me as if by right. All that said, honor due process as that is a precious heritage, just remember the cost so the situation never arises again. Oh, and hold the cost against those who enabled this situation.

Mexican chickens are more promiscuous. Canadian chickens have to do something during those long cold winters.

Imagine had Rosa Parks not only refused to give up her seat, but she thern shanked the honkey motherlover who directed her to do so.

Frankly I want a higher level of discourse from our representatives than was dispalyed here. Of course she is not my direct representactive, so there is that.

Go for the record of most flips executed consecutively.

California where they have cage free laws for chickens and the children of illegals

I believe it was a Mothra, not a Mothman. Two different things to my understanding though it may be that Mothmen grow into Mothras given time, I really don't know. Does anybody?.

If Trump defies the Supremes they can issue a show cause order for him to appear and answer why. If he answers unsatisfactorily he can be placed in their subterranian dungeon, if he does not appear they can issue a writ and have Dog the Bounty Hunter go after him.

More akin to mecha-Streisand.

They could release Mecha-Rehnquist. It has been in development for several years. They have finaly perfected the eye lasers and its photon hand grenades, not to mention its temporary paralysis bad breath. Mecha-Rehnquist is an unstoppable force dedicated to enforcing Supreme Court Orders and answerable to no one, except Mecha-Sandra Day O'Connor.

Just me, or my clothing and any implements I was holding?

Arguments in lawsuit using ‘insurrection’ clause to knock Trump off presidential ballots begins | PBS NewsHour I used a PBS link. There are other links to this, both local and national covering essentially the same story if one cares to look and one finds PBS links biased. Essentially there is an effort to keep Trump from being on the Colorado ballot next year. The argument is under Article 3 of the 14th amendment. The arguement is that those who engage in insurrection are not eligible for office if they have once taken an oath to uphold and protect the Constitution. I find the matter interesting for two reasons. First, the 14th amendment came about during reconstruction after the civil war. Fairly clearly the concept of "insurrection" being addressed by the amendment was the recently resolved civil war. To compare the disorderly riot of Jan. 6 to insurrection as contempalted at the time seem in apropos. There are other arguments with the language including whether it covers Presidents, but that is the main argument. Second, the judge hearing the matter is a democrat. I do not have any issue with that. But this particular judge made a contribution to a group specifically seeking to forward the very argument she is now hearing. She states she has an open mind and will not recuse herself, but to me the issue is not whether she does or not so much as the appearance of bias given her donation. How is her ruling, even if correct and fair, to be recieved in light of her contribution. The ruling will lack some moral authority given her contribution. Of course today how do you find a judge who is not from one side of the political spectrum or the other? Curious if any here are following this.

He would have to come back from the grave.

Did the man never play Risk? Maybe it was not around when he was of an appropriate age for playing board games. Seems Parker Bros. brought us Risk in 1959. (In answer to my own question)

I went to the University of Rochester where my best buddy was a heroin addict and a brilliant Chemical Engineer. he was hired directly out of school by Bausch and Lomb and he massivley improved the nascent gas permeable contact lense.

AOC's ever expanding butt mandates she fly in a conveyance with accomodating seats. Its a medical necessity.

The government teat is drying up and some don't like that.

Or congress.

Wondering how long it will be before the entire student body wants finals cancelled due to their trauma.

Pity the poor Surenos. At one time they were getting their share of press, but with Tren de Aragua and MS-13 dominating headlines they have lost nearly all prestige. Que lastima. Pobrecitos.

Fever dream?

Are you saying he is WeePaws?

Did she do essentially what she accused Trump of doing? There are allegations only at this point, and so I don't know their veracity, but they are that she claimed a Virginia residence as her primary residence to obtain a loan. She did so while living 500 miles away in New York and while serving in a New York Elected Office which requires her to have residency in N.Y. Further it is alleged she misrepresented the number of units in an investment property to obtain a more favorable loan rate. Finally, and it would have little bearing due to the statute of limitation, though she had little use for it when prosecuting Trumpo, she seems to have listed her father as her husband on loans to include his income and wealth so that she might obtain the loan. The statute of limitations having run on the latter matter that allegation is not criminally relevant, but it may be of interest to her State Bar as it shows a lack of proper character and respect for the law to then be allowed to practice law. Just as Ceasar's wife needs to be beyond reproach, so too I would argue Prosecutors. Seems the chickens may come home to roost.