Engorgeous George

I had no idea those models were so large

Of course she had a boyfriend. That is part of the process of learning to hate us, being exposed to us. To bad she did not take the less violent path of simply becoming a lesbian.

I am no voyeur so i don't know what that may look like. I believe in allowing monkeys their privacy.

Pangolins took a reputational hit akin to that experienced by the Duke Lacrosse team.

If he had more cats he could name two others Old and Dusty.

I remember how mad my wife got when I celebrated before she passed the goal line.

A position I would find very dangerous.

They call that middle ground the John Rambo zone.

Does this post mean "Weak, Sperm Boy." , or "Weak sperm, boy!"

I am going to say that there is ,indeed, some difference. How much of a difference would depend on the individual jury or judge ruling on damages. I know I myself would not like to have either moniker attached to my name.

I believe Bond drives an Aston Martin, not a Jaguar, but then I have not seen all the films so perhaps he drives both.

Could be you are doing it wrong.

She reminds me very much of my college girlfriend except for the sleepy eye thing she has going on. Cute, sexy, but not gorgeous. If she was standing next to prime Kathy Ireland for instance most guys would step on her head just to get a closer look at Kathy.

I am unclear how this assumption can be made. To my understanding that lab had many projects being run and when they got the funding they added yet another project. I suppose it is possible others may have funded this new effort, or they may have gotten there themselves without the funding which is really a nothing more than a request to undertake a new project, but to presume that seems a bridge too far.

Difficult to know what believing all women entails if one cannot define the category of women. In my experience women are very capable of resorting to deception and deceit to obtain their goals.

Eighty-four year olds probably ought not be wearing high heels.

To take this a step further, since it is the property owner or managers who hired and approved of the hire of the night watchman it is they, under your theory who are resposnible for any crimes committed. Seems that puts you, Tim, in a very tenuous position as someone who owns and manages commercial properties. We will miss you Tim as you serve out your many sentences.

We need to get Ethan Hunt and his IMF team on this.

A fascinatingly stupid analogy. If something happens under one's watch one is responsible, even if they had no knowledge of what happened and even if they had implemented policies and practices to prevent the activity. So any night watchman at a building is legally responsible for any rape, murder, or theft that occurs in the building. Any Commander of a military base is responsible for any crimes that occur surreptitiously on his or her base. Next time you construct a straw man argument maybe try to not have the main premise be so galactically stupid.

As to "clear" that is a civil standard of proof, "clear and convincing. You should be argueing that "beyond a reasonable doubt" he commited the acts. As for "crimes described" acts were committed on his behalf and with his general knowledge, if not his specific knowledge or direct participation. Those acts were postured as crimes by the D.A. and the judge in a first time and novel application of the law. Whether that application will withstand appellate review is very much an open question and to me seems doubtful, but who knows?

Congratulations. So your senior year took 32 years. Nice. I wish I had extended my collegce years. Those were good years. Maybe I can return to school for another degree. It would be cool being the Universities oldest freshmen in the freshmen dorms.

On the off chance, unlikely though it may be, that others want to explore the concept of a National Emergency I went and found this link ... A Guide to Emergency Powers and Their Use | Brennan Center for Justice I have explored the link only briefly, thus far, but in that brief time found it instructive. Frankly this is an area where I need quite a bit of educatio0n. I will likely spend some time in that link, and others.

It is an invasive influx of foreigners but not by foreign countries. There is a marked distinction. Many of the problems presented by the influx are urgent, but I would not call them a national emergency. Raisng the question, for me, of what is a national emergency and is it defined and does it have legal standing). Also, while there may be a role for the military in guarding the border and constructing the bordeer wall and deportation processing facilities I would not support the military conducting policing actions as that violates the law.

Someday I hope to run across some of his pieces at a garage sale or at the Hotel/Motel art show, assuming I ever went to one of those.

I will wait for the liguidation sale before I buy any of it, but I like his use of color.