Engorgeous George

That is how I found the site to begin with. I was minding my own business and that site kept popping up. I also get the Revolve site, a ladies cothing site. I don't mind that so much as usually it pops up with a very hot mulato chick in a semi-transparent white dress.

Nice. I particularly like the ladies large gardening hat. It could be a whole new look for me.

Munchausen's by proxy. This chemical castation seems likely to serve the mother's needs for attention more than the kids needs.

Well played.

Rodentially stupid. Dumb as a shithouse rat.

Good input. My hat is likely to get both sweaty and wet.

If I show my wife and daughter this website I am likely to end up with four hats by late winter what with Christmas and my birthday coming up.

I ride horses very seldom. I do ski, hunt, fish, and kayak and raft. White hair and beard and now that I am retired I am pretty much in jeans. I do not have any cowboy boots. Maybe that all helps suggestions, I don't know.

I was favoring the Waga Waga, but do I really want to look like Bunny Bastatrds?

I'm thinking a neophyte like me ought to avoid bespoke hats, at least at first. I am more of a bestutter sort of fellow than bespoke.

Probably going for a mountain man, river running, hermit/hillbilly look. Not sure yet. Definitely not Indiana Jones or Billy Jack, and the baseball cap thing is not for me.

I prefer Malik Willis, but that's me.

One of the most satisfying sounds there is would be the sound of the air being forced suddenly out of another man's lungs. Whether from a perfect tackle, a well aimed punch or kick, or a body slam, there is something tremendously satisfying about that sound, and the few moments the opponent goes "turtle" gasping for air and with a look of panic in their eyes.

I think thaat was Bob Eubanks.

I suppose you are correct. When everyone knows what you will say, before you say it, and folks now expect your hyperbole to push hard the envelope between hyperbole and lie, when you offer nothing new, you have become boring and I probably should not amplify that by commenting on your posts thus encouraging you to respond yet again, in a boring manner.

I know Trump likes to say so, but Trump thinks everything associated with him is the most outstanding example of that thing. The fact is that his victory does not rate in the top ten eloectoral college victories and in fact is in the bottom half.

No.

Well it was interesting to me that you could be justifying a situation three months before it even came to pass. Apparently you are prescient. That is interesting. Even more interesting is that someone who is prescient is so often wrong about the future. Alternatively you apparently want to join the ranks of revisionist historians as the other explanation is you are attempting to rewrite and redefine history hoping nobody would notice. Either way, interesting.

Well, terchnically not for another 57 days or so.

I am not partial to sake or to Psaki.

Interesting that you started explaining that vote 3 months before she was nominated.

An excellent idea.

I like the cut of your jib.

I am trying to imagine the arguments which will ensue when woke, leftist, atheist teach from these texts and put their spin on the material. I imagine the parents of kids who are fundamental, evangelical, christians will be up in arms. I guess one more time we will circle, unproductively, around church and state issues. Me, I wish both sides would simply agree to teach fundamental academic tools in school. Stop trying to indocrinate and instead provide our youngsters with the tools to think and decide for themselves what they believe. Teach reading, writing, language, arithmatic, rhetoric, logic, debate, sciences, and history with the latter being carefully taught as one persons history is another persons indoctrination.

I hope when you are done she believes you have Made Anal Great Again.