RLLD

I also question this. While I have no doubt that Israel will pursue their ongoing elimination, with the tacit support of the new US government, I do wonder how this might unfold. I hope that Israel CAN in fact diminish and perhaps "eliminate" Hamas. They are a vile entity that has only caused harm.

I think there are those who want to insist that things are just great, and refuse to accept or acknowledge the damage that has been done and the harm caused. I might note that it is this active gaslighting which was rather helpful in swaying the election away from them. So while we might want object, lets allow them room to do this, it will help in the mid terms.

I agree with your assessment of the Post, but I find it more centrist than some others. It tends to offset some of the lies that arise out of the Times. We have to first agree that all media is perverted by political affiliation, and none of it can simply be trusted. Only through careful digestion across the range of politicized media (except MSNBC, no one should ever consume that excrement) followed by individual research can we hope to arrive at something nearing a reasonable assessment of what is perhaps true.

I do not concur with your self assessment. I have repeatedly observed you ignoring facts and reality to serve your own opinion. That you might object to their depiction indicates to me that it simply does not align with a liberal point of view, and nothing more.

Well, this is just my opinion in general so take it with a grain of salt. I have never fired that weapon used by Oswald, and in fact have never attempted the same shot scenario. I am speaking more in generalities.

Maybe later they can produce something that aligns with your personal opinions, and can be considered :accurate" at that time.

While the shot was not easy, it was within the realm of possibility for an average Marine rifleman. We trained relentlessly with our weapons and that is a shot no outside the potential for an average Marine marksman. When I was at sniper school we qualified at 1000 yards on a moving target. Now that is done with a much better weapon a Barret "lite", and we practiced for hours to achieve that skill. I think my point is that anyone can, with work and proper coaching, achieve that kind of shot capability.

I may not recall correctly, but I thought what I saw was a rather close election, which sadly Caruso lost. Your point remains. Caruso was present, understood the situation, and did something......as much as he could.....to get ahead of this, which IS leadership. Voters really need to pay attention and stop voting for those incapable of doing the job.

LBJ was a rabid racist who pretended to care about the AA community to secure their votes, and then implemented legislation that on its face appears to be "good" but actually destroyed the AA community. He did not run for office again because most of America hated him for his lying and actions around the Vietnam War. Think about the string of utter failures we endured as a nation from LBJ to Nixon to Ford and then Carter.....

I think it is clear that the Mayor did not adequately prepare for the potential of a fire, really much at all. She failed her people. Now, consider this as well, could she really have done much to fight this fire off? I mean it would have required more than she had at her disposal I think, but she may have been able to save lives and at least lessen the impact if she had any concept of leadership.

We already know...... ANY attempt to hold a Democrat accountable is ....racist......misogynist....or what ever other bullsh!t term they can trot out

Yes, and what are people saying? They are calling him out for not protecting more of the city......well, then elect him if that is what you people want, dont be so focking stupid as to elect a Democrat

the voters elected Bass over Caruso, I bet they wish they could do that over Hell, Caruso already had hired help to fight off potential fires two days before the fires started.....THAT....is what a focking leader does......

I do not concur, she is far worse thana stereotypical politician

I do find Hirono to be in competition with Schiff for worst human.......

Sure, and Obama being the superlative orator he is, succinctly captured it in a phrase that we can leverage easily moving forward.

No one is blaming Obama for anything, quite the contrary, he is being held up for the standard he projected, using his words is indicative of their value.

The promise of peace is the threat. Inching closer to anything that appears to be conciliatory or accepting of Israel is when Muslims will rise up and foment war.

Oh, well, the poster with whom I was interacting was lamenting that Hegseth was being confirmed, I recall when those on the right were lamenting what Obama was doing and his response was.....elections have consequences.....so we can thank him for showing us how to best deal with objections.

Uhmmm, you just made your question even less clear, I have no idea what you are asking

Oh, well, then you and I will have to agree to disagree on what is right and wrong.

I dont understand the question

I see this debacle in three distinct elements. 1) Quality of the policy/planning 2) Quality if the implementation of policy/planning 3) Quality of active reaction to evolving situation I get all the Democrats blah blah blah.....but, at the end of the day ONLY OUTCOMES matter. So any evaluation should focus only on the material. I am not surprised that Democrats would elevate virtue signaling over basic services, so i this event we might have a case study to show them how focking stu0pid they are.

Remember when Obama said elections have consequences when people complained? Yeah, lets go ahead and use that now.