Fireballer

But it stopped when their feet hit American soil, right?

Holy shat that’s terrible

What is so ambiguous about the law and how did said ambiguity apply here?

Like I said, a detective would have to articulate in writing how this physician knowingly killed a fetus by removing remaining tissue from a 4 day old pharmaceutical abortion. This is sad, and would obviously be worse if she was very sick immediately after, but felt like she couldn’t do anything about it. I would have thought that the MD in NC would have been obligated to provide her with some follow up in GA. I’m personally kinda neutral on abortion in general. I don’t like the idea of it just seen as birth control and it would seem logical to put some type of limit on it. I think most people fall somewhere in the at 22 week window. Other than that, I don’t see the point of being much more restrictive. Medical practitioners shouldn’t have to worry about legal issues, but this case isnt the hill to die on.

What I’m saying is those are two common examples of procedures where a non viable fetus is removed. Just because the code mentions those, doesn’t mean that other scenarios where a non viable fetus is removed are illegal.

Those may be carve outs for more common scenerios, but “not an abortion” isn’t limited to those scenarios. I think you would be hard pressed to articulate PC in this scenario given the demands of the code. “with knowledge that termination will, with reasonable likelihood, cause the death of an unborn child;” Im sure ultrasounds and a variety of diagnostics were done to confirm the situation. Remember, all this has to be articulated into an affidavit or warrant. All elements of the code have to be met. This would have been a nothing burger.

I’m hammering the abortion definition because if a procedure doesn’t meet the legal definition, then all of the discussion about GA abortion law, Rowe, and Trump is not applicable. Hence, my original post calling all of this bullshat that Kamala is bringing it up.

Cool. Then you can give me a link to go read about the changes. Did the definition of abortion change? None of it matters though, this is still on the docs/ hospital. 20 hour wait is not excusable.

What changed? What additional legal hurdles were put into place? Also, I was wrong, your Newsweek article didn’t say “stripping constitutional rights”. It says “stripping constitutional protections”. Its literally in the 2nd paragraph. I stand by my assertion, or we splitting hairs over rights/protections?

Georgia had a 22 week abortion ban previously. The definition of abortion is clear now and it was clear then. Nothing changed but the time paremeters. The definition is clearly written in statute. There was no live pregnancy to abort. The only thing murky is the articles you linked. Anyone that uses the term “stripped constitutional rights” when referring to Roe overturn is an activist, not a journalist. HTH

Could the research experts provide some context please?

This wasnt an abortion. If you’re a practicing OB doc near Atlanta, and don’t know what the definition of abortion is in your state, you’re an idiot. This definition existed way before Roe was overturned. Its malpractice plain and simple. Did you also notice in your research the the only verbiage used from the medical board’s investigation was “preventable”? I wonder why?

Scorpions’ Klaus Meine Dude was like 5’5” and was trying to get away with that bald on top/mullet hair do. Prob not a chick magnet

Anyone want to fact check this utter bullshat?

Add it to the stack of lies…

Unfortunately, these types have been allowed to pollute academia. A generation of malleable minds being fed garbage, produces garbage..

This is like the purple cloud telling on who pee peed in the swimming pool

Are you listening to local, syndicated, XM, etc? I enjoy some good talk radio from both sides, but it’s hard to find good stuff on actual broadcast radio. Recccomendations?

They wouldn’t give up the name of the stupid IT guy that deactivated their accounts. But I found out, and apparently he’s important on some low rent message board

She played her a$$ off today.

If this wasn’t Trump, the first attempt would still be the biggest story of the election, and a 2nd attempt within months would be considered one of the most serious events in presidential history

It’s literally the reason they have TPS. It’s a shathole

What an ignorant attempt at a retort and more evidence of your lack of awareness.

You really should go do a ride along with your local police and try to obtain a police procedural statute manual for your state. Your lack of comprehension of the abilities and discretions of law enforcement is sad considering you’re a grown adult. Everything you’re arguing against is literally in the scope of what cops legally do every day. I’m serious, reach out and go ride with them and ask questions. It will be an enlightening experience. Good luck.

Gotcha