Fireballer

Lefties: “Its not like gender ideology is being shoved down your throats, you bigots”. Teachers Unions are steaming piles of garbage.

How many wings?

Can’t argue there, boyo

I’m asking you because you’re the one making the assumption that the words about showering with Joe is what is being misinterpreted. You’re gobbling up this subjective letter just as they intended. They could be talking about anything in the whole diary being misinterpreted, and not technically be lying. It’s all intentionally vaguery

You think she didn’t write that letter with legal assistance to divert attention from her words? LMAO. It’s intentionally vague. She confirms the diary is hers and she penned that Joe and her showered. What’s to misinterpret boyo? The definition of a shower? Stick to your other claims of expertise boyo, your legal acumen is elementary at best.

The boyo is unhinged. What exactly do you think is misinterpreted from the diary? Is she lying about the showering with Joe and being hyper sexualized as a child?

Your use of a vaguery like “recognition” is what allows you to, in your mind, diminish the issue. So sidestepping this isn’t shocking.

Define “recognition” in this instance. And who is “we”?

You do know the “reasonable officer” is hypothetical, right? They don’t bring a peer cop into court and pick their brain.

This specific situation, I’m not sure. I haven’t dug into it past some news blurbs and edited body cam. My initial lean, if you will, is against the officer. This is a tough one though. Most interactions with an armed person don’t occur like this. There’s usually some type of brandishing, a threat, furtive movement, refusal to obey commands, etc.

No they don’t. They’re judged by the reasonable officer test. If a reasonable officer would know that what they did was wrong, there’s no defense.

Do you think there’s a special secret list of rights police can’t violate? I’d start with the Constitution as an “established” source. Are you saying people don’t know that police have to adhere to constitutional rights or are you saying people dont know what’s in the Constitution?

Hold on, Ben Crump said it was “breached”. Are you lying?

The OG strain? You mean when vaccines were still just a hope? We were on at least the 5th strain in Aug 2020.

So, again, what was the point of people being fired/jobs threatened based on vax status?

What was the point of anyone’s job being threatened based on vax status?

She’s probably annoying as fuk, but not wrong here.

Who the hell is gonna be running mate?

These peoples lives were ruined over lies. No un-vaxxed people had any ill effect on others. In fact, being vaxxed put you at higher risk of getting Covid. This superspreader sh!t and all of the “pandemic of the unvaxxed” was all lies.

Explain to me the difference between my post and your post.

Lmao…evil doings have a time table and dismissed because the quantity doesn’t fit your narrative. What an idiot.

I don’t think he thinks this. What he thinks is that discrimination against white male christians doesn’t matter. It’s the whole oppressor/oppressed facade.

Wait, you think people didn’t lose their jobs for not getting vaxxed?

I don’t see many women clamoring to break through the glass ceiling into the Selective Service.

Well, in your defense, you did like a good sheep and listened to your “experts”.