Fireballer

Good point

Yes, they did. I’m just thinking abortion is enough to keep them blue and the economy won’t be enough to swing them to Trump.

My gut tells me abortion, although not a priority for most voters, will be a big issue for the suburban white women who could easily swing this election in the direction of either candidate. They probably just happen to be a demographic who isn’t quite as affected by economy. We’ll see. I’m mostly basing this on a solid red Ohio codifying abortion last year. Anecdotally, my wife fits that demographic and she talks often about her conservative leaning friends and co-workers talking about it. It’s not that they would have ever sought an abortion themselves, it’s more about the principle of controlling their actions. Thoughts?

You in bizarro world? The old man literally walked right up to Sandmann and beat his drum in his face. You have the violation of personal space backwards.

So your position has changed? Glad to hear it.

It’s classic oppressedvs oppressor, just like every other progressive grift to topple Western white colonial imperialism, or whatever the fuk theyre angry over. Your viewpoint doesn’t compute, when viewed through a Marxist lens. It’s the same way Joy Reid and Ibram X Khendis views aren’t considered racism. Some racism, Anti- Zionism, etc just doesn’t count. It’s just the rules the left plays by.

Ding ding ding!

Here’s another reminder that Free Palestine/BLM/antifa/queer theory/CRTers/stolen land, etc people are literally all the same commies.

GoFundMe for these patriots is almost 75k. https://www.gofundme.com/f/pi-kappa-phi-men-defended-their-flag-throw-em-a-rager

Sanctuary? Danzone?

Is it bigoted if you say you don’t want any drunk white Russian wife beaters to immigrate to your country?

Why would the American flag need to be protected? It’s not like these are anti-American commies they’re dealing with. These are just kids protesting genocide.

Legit commies. If you roll her social media back to 2020, I’m sure it’s littered with BLM activism.

Is this serious?

I’ve made numerous post critical of your beliefs. Honestly, thanks for not losing your sense of humor

Since 99% of police encounters are completely fine, literally everyone should be backing the police 99% of the time.

You will get no argument from the GC on this

Wouldn’t something have to be considered at least “good” before you could even consider it rooned?

That’s the question no one wants to answer. If you replace the people, whose societal and cultural norms made a place worth fleeing to, when does it cease to be a place worth fleeing to?

Nothing will overcome the drive for population control.

When nuance appears, Tim runs for cover. Police encounters are completely about nuance. Small details about what is said or what is known, makes a world of difference. Because of your ignorance, situations appear scary or unfair to you. You’re one of those guys that looks at a situation and says “that just doesn’t feel right”.

I don’t doubt that something happened, and you witnessed it, but there’s still details left out. First, if there was a crime committed in the area, a detention was reasonable. What’s the CA state law on time for detention during an investigation? If a black man was described as the perp, is it racist to detain a black man?

So they literally walked up, said nothing, dragged him to a police car, held him for several hours, and just eventually told him that a black man committed a robbery and that they detained him because he was black?