Fireballer

All good points. Saying this is a non relatable story is a good description. Even though most probably have an idea that these things happen, very few people want details. I don’t foresee her making the best seller list with this one.

Although, she was just an armed citizen at the time, and not in law enforcement capacity, Jean is probably the best example in recent memory that fits what Tim was looking for. Its hard to be less threatening than a dude chillin in his own crib.

Got it, thanks

Nope. I said I haven’t followed it so I don’t know all the details. You blanketing my question as “killing puppies is NBD” is lazy. Killing a dog could be a very big deal, maybe not. Is this situation a big deal? Why or why not?

I agree. Even if it’s justified, it’s nothing to be proud of. Putting it in the book comes off as super dooshy.

Who said that?

I haven’t really been following the story, but what exactly are we upset about here? The simple fact a dog is dead? Do we think the dog wasnt dangerous to humans and livestock? The manner in which it was killed was inhumane? Someone holding public office is capable of this? That state laws allow this?

This is why everyone sees you as a joke or a troll. Your links that you posted yesterday focused on police shootings. Now, you say you have never mentioned shootings? You posted these to support systemic racism. You either can’t read, or you lazily just grab links that you think might agree with you without reading them.

These racist mutherfukers give cops a bad name

No Tim, don’t assume my point. I haven’t made one. I’m specifically asking you, who posted these links, how do they support systemic racism?

@WhiteWonder @RaiderHaters Revenge im gonna be getting back into table blackjack on an upcoming trip. All the tidbits in the OP legit?

Again Tim, we don’t know how to interpret your links. Theres no delineation between justified and unjustified shootings in there. An overwhelming number of police shootings are justified. How are your links supporting your narrative of systemic racism?

So you posted these links in support of your belief? How am I supposed to interpret that information? Are you saying the systemic racism is supported by justified police shooting data?

So, Tim, we can really get down to the heart of this if you would like. After perusing your “studies”, I don’t have much faith in them. For example, the article includes names of black men who were killed justifiably as an attention getter. There’s no delineation between justifiable situations and unjustifiable situations.So, what exactly is your main concern on this topic?

Can you moaoaoan the blues?

Not really following exactly where you’re going with this, but I think it might be kinda funny

Everyone please check your individual state laws and see if there’s verbiage about shooting a dog on site that is acting in manner she describes. I bet you will be surprised. Noem said the dog ruined a hunt and later attacked chickens owned by a local family, behaved like a "trained assassin," and was "dangerous to anyone she came in contact with."

Dude nearly lost his life because of a scorned teacher that didn’t get his contract renewed. And several teachers and a student schemed to make it go viral in the community. This is pretty scary. Here is the audio

Damn. Dude was certainly one of a kind. RIP if true

You’re making this up or reading extremely lazy journalists.Neither would be shocking. Nearly every report on this is using specific verbiage the Baltimore Co Government media release, which doesn’t include impersonation.

You keep saying this is a charge of impersonation, whatever that is. What Maryland statute covers that? You do know there’s additional charges, right? The verbiage “motivated by the race of the victim” is the qualifying language as a hate crime straight from Marylands AG website. Tim, you haven’t formed an opinion without research again, have you?

No he hasn’t. But thats a far cry from saying that it’s impossible for it to be a hate crime. And just because he doesn’t get charged with a hate crime, doesn’t mean that it doesn’t meet the elements to do so. Again, do you think that this persons participation in this crime was motivated by the victims race? Before answering, remember that any crime against the person can have a hate crime qualifier.

If there’s ever an idiot Olympics, you and Tim would tie for gold. It’s obvious you still haven’t even researched what he’s been charged with. It’s laughable that you’re trying to straddle the fence here now.

So where are you with this? Sure that this couldnt qualify as a hate crime anywhere in the country, or are you holding judgement since you haven’t seen evidence of it yet?

You still steadfast that this can’t meet the criteria of a hate crime?