Fireballer

Tim Hauk bumped it in a weird attempt to discredit me while he was rage typing at me in another thread.

You’re right Tim, you’re just oozing with humility.

Tim, I know you’re wired to think lock step with MSM and bloated government institutions, but use some reasoning here. There’s no fuking way they know, either way, right now. It was farcical from them to go from “we know he is NOT solely responsible” to “he acted alone” I less than 24 hours. The ink is barely dry on the preservation letter and warrant for phone records. And then, to pat yourself on the back for being thinking rationally about it…just sad.

So when should we make the distinction…when we know the facts or when your feelings tell you to do so?

“Asserting”. The FBI has not asserted anything. Less than 24 hours ago, they said “ We don’t feel that he is solely responsible”. You don’t know the first thing about criminal investigation, it’s obvious. Calling yourself rational is a joke. Keep wishcasting.

Post of the year on Jan 1?

Related??? https://x.com/defiantls/status/1874625723513925934?s=46&t=DFWeVowvyy-F23jlecK3zw

Imagine being broken by TDS so much that you resort to these thoughts about innocent Americans.

Again, nothing different in the process of someone illegal trying to rent, vs US citizen that’s unqualified to rent. It’s was just an attempt at a gotcha to some hard right posters, who you thought would hammer the illegal angle, based on nothing. I get it, it’s your shtick.

Link? They specifically said that Campbell broke no laws and that Torres was wrong his attempts to control his position or detain him?

LMAO, you’re so fuking weird. STFU!!!! More rage typing!!! Gun thrown! Nothing you posted has substantiated your original claim of a 350 mile trek being interrupted by a “paper trail”. Track the vehicle!!! APB!!!! All hands on deck!!!

1. I put no weight in what attorneys strategically do. 2. You still have no understanding of why Torres handled Campbell the way he did. His stupidity of quoting a statute that wasn’t in effect, doesn’t prohibit him from acting on existing statute and executing valid police procedure. I’ve explained this in detail previously, but for some reason you analyze this whole thing in a weird emotional slant that ignores what cops are allowed to. Like I said a while ago, go do a ride along with your local police. Maybe you will take a different view. I’m done.

Bet the farm on Tex ML.

This is great. At least you’re trying to base your thoughts on facts. But nothing you have posted all day has substantiated that immigration status and the associated phantom paper trail, specifically, would be the main deterrent in suicidal terrorists renting a car. After reading Texas statute, I would say that your stance is that having a fake ID, illegal alien or not, would be the main factor in deterring suicidal terrorists from renting a car.

This is why people kick you in the teeth around here. You post these little quips like they’re some sort of gotcha. You are basically saying that I can’t think Hill was guilty of domestic violence, and still remain remain objective in the Miami stadium incident. You exposed yourself with your stance that Torres’ previous action should disqualify him from an objective judgment in his interaction with Hill and company. Just because you can’t process objectivity, doesn’t mean others can’t.

LMAO…I wasn’t assuming that. I was basing that statement on SCOTUS case law,that Hill I’m sure had no awareness of, that gave them authority to remove him. If anything, at the time, I was giving Hill more wiggle room than the cops. But you don’t understand that. What a moron. Just stay down.

Track the car? Why? What statute covers attempting to rent a car without ID? Or would they create a pretextual stop, which are widely frowned upon, to investigate the word of a counter worker at Enterprise? There’s nothing here to justify any law interaction. And I thought this paper trail was suppose to interrupt his 350 mile drive in the actual falsely obtained vehicle? Keep watching Hawaii 5-0 reruns.

Majority opinion of geeks think it’s “overboard”. Like I said, you obviously lack the ability to process objectivity. NOTHING about the officers past history should be considered until discipline phase. I didn’t “assume” anything. I used my knowledge of constitutional law, and research of Florida law to determine that it was “probable” that the people approaching the scene were breaking Florida statutes. “Overboard” …LMAO.

Maybe not far off, she herself ran over two people in her police vehicle.

Ok, the cops do what then?

Sure, OK. How exactly do you think Torres’ previous history should factor into that day with Hill back in Sept?

How objective of you. Now I see how you lack a grasp of the legal process.

And Torres’ attorney said he should immediately be placed back on duty. The stupidity of thinking someone is right because they are a lawyer is on brand for you. Lawyers are wrong all the time. Sorry your attempt to “own” me was a fail.

JFC…is there literally something wrong with you? Are you on the spectrum? Please provide a legitimate scenario where this “paper trail” idiocy would cause this guy to get caught.

You literally highlighted an article about this cop acting inappropriately in other cases. Your lack of mental acuity will not let you recognize that the Hill situation is not one of them. Your view here literally flies in the face of the legal process.