tubby_mcgee

Yeah, but it got political. Started off with something about a turkey vs ham.

Thank you sir!

You were saying?

Let me guess, they are all Trump voters? Get real. They are all liberals. Also, they should be mowed down with AR's. Not because they're liberals, but because they are filthy rotten vermin that provide ZERO to society.

1. Caption this photo: https://media.nbcnewyork.com/2021/09/willard-scott-al-roker.png?fit=1200%2C675&quality=85&strip=all 2. Why do so many people, when in a picture with another person, point at them? Look at peoples Facebook pictures. Almost every guy has a picture sitting with their friend (at bar drinking etc), while one or both of them are pointing towards the other.

When I started this, I seriously just wanted to see who was okay with men being in women's sports.

Its a focking fad. It's trendy for folks that don't fit in to look for common ground with others that don't fit in.

So you're taking a stance to essentially anger the other side? What you're doing is what basically happening around the US. Responses not based on true belief, but responses based on "the opposite of what the other side truly believes". And this is part of the big problem in the US now. Conservatives are and always have been anti-crime. Liberals, have (for the same reason what you say above), have become pro-crime. Back when Trump called MS-13 a bunch of filthy rats or animals whatever, MSNBC and CNN began defending MS-13, thus getting liberals to follow suit. Honcho, why can't you speak for your inner beliefs? Why do you have to instead speak speak the words that your leaders would want you to speak/opposite of the other side? Why does any liberal? I've always said that I feel like liberals don't come up with their own opinions. They simply react, and their opinion becomes "the opposite of what other side thinks". I've said it on this board before. That exact thing. And now Mike Honcho just, with laser guided smart-bomb accuracy, proved my point.

Does braided even go as low as 8lb test?

That's the way it was 40 years ago. Not the exact percentage. But, "Old and stuffy people are conservative, young people are liberal" (generally). Also, most everyone on the PLANET would agree that as people get older, they get wiser. Analyze that, folks.

Exactly. Thanks for playing. Get better at debating. When you get better, I'll respond.

I don't have evidence that pit bulls are more dangerous than golden retrievers. Only anecdotal evidence. Same with "teens are worse drivers than adults". Same with white people are more likely to molest kids. Same with black men are more likely to go out for milk only to never return. Same with "Amish work harder than the rest of us" Same with Blacks are better sprinters. Same with "the folks that truly love guns the most ("NRA and 2A backers") are the least likely to commit gun violence. Same with "kids that spend their time hunting and fishing are less likely to vandalize, murder, rob, steal vs kids that don't. Same with saying "most violent felons in prison have an abundance of tattoos". Same with me assuming that if you're gay, or you have pink hair, or you're a tranny or you have gigantic gages in your ear and piercings all over your face, it's likely you're liberal. It's all true. All of it. Everyone who can think...KNOWS these things. But about 50% of the population will dig their feet in and disagree. Well...uhh..."pretend to disagree". Sure, their might be stats on some of those that would make it more "real" evidence vs anecdotal, but as far was what I can use to effectively argue my point off the top of my head, all I have is anecdotal evidence. When I cite "liberals in jail"and show a picture of the jail roster, and its mostly black, Mexicans and minorities, folks will often say "did you poll them to see their political affiliation?" I don't need to. Stop. Look around. Look who the anti-Trumpers are. Look at the crowds that do most of the looting of businesses. Look up how the black and minority vote. Birds of a feather. I'm sorry that it's easy for me to see.

okay "if they just cease to exist". Don't know how else to really say it.

THAT is the reason I wait for liberals to give when I say that celebrities in general are useless. Most are useless and provide nothing. Farmers, doctors, teachers, firemen, construction workers, scientists are USEFUL. We need them. We do NOT need celebs. If they all died tonight at midnight, we'd all be fine. They provide nothing. If farmers disappeared at midnight, we'd all be FOCKED. The "generosity" you refer to, is a ONLY a result (mostly) liberals giving their money to who subscriptions to "Entertainment weekly" so they can see what kind of hairspray Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce use. So, I'll argue that my reaction is well thought out, and that yours is KNEE-JERK reaction. I say that because I post (that celebs are useless) in many places where people are ooohing and ahhing over who Katy Perry was seen at the movie with, and their instant reaction is ALWAYS, ALWAYS, ALWAYS "But they give!!!!" There could be wayyyyyyyy more money "GIVEN" if folks would take the money they spend on/give to celebrities and simply donated a teeny tiny eencie weencie portion to charity. Celebs are worthless. Many libs will argue that we need celebrities more than we need farmers, citing "Yah...farmer shmarmer, I'll get my food from a grocery store"

Let's be serious and take out the sarcasm: Statistically speaking, very little chance it was a tranny. Statistically speaking its near a 100% chance it was a male. Statistically speaking, very high chance it was liberal/dem/lefty/anti-Trump/non-NRA/non-2A guy. The thing is, no one---well actually, liberals don't want to be serious about things like this. Easier to throw in jokes, divert attention, etc.

Kyle absolutely deserves a statue. Lebron James is a waste of oxygen. He provides nothing to society. I think the best thing for all of us would be for Lebron James to "charge at" an American who is holding an AR15.

If there is destroying of property or hurting others, whatever side someone is on should put dealt with harshly. I'm all for removing anyone from society forever--- REFOCKINGGARDLESS which side they are. I don't like focktards regardless. Bullet or lifetime in prison. Whatever. Get rid of them. Facts will show though, overall, with the violence in this country most are dems/liberals. They aren't where all violence comes from, they are where MOST violent crime comes from.

Not sure if you're aware, but life doesn't revolve around "the Geeks" and whether the Geeks approve or not. Just because no Geeks are in the videos of the BLM protestors driving through crowds or the liberals that are looting Targets and other retail stores or burning businesses or police cars, doesn't mean it's okay or that it didn't happen. "Well at the least the liberals on the Geek Board didn't do it, so that makes it okay!" I guess you and I will simply have to disagree.

Which weapons below do you think you'd win a 1-on-1 vs that gorilla, if he started at 50 feet away and was at a full charge? 1.) bare hands- you vs him. (obviously not) 2.) Aluminum baseball bat 3.) Single shot .22 caliber rifle 4.) sharpened to a point 8 foot long oak closet rod 5.) You and a well trained pit bull 6.) you with an aluminum baseball bat PLUS a well trained pit bull 7.) You with an aluminum baseball bat PLUS your best friend who has a 3 foot long piece of heavy log chain 8.) Electric chainsaw with 12" bar/chain.

And what comprises "politcal" talk? The subjects above...that I just listed...many have political relations.

How did he draw the line with political talk? What about talking about the following topics Science Religion Freedom Of Speech The Right to Bear Arms Abortion Magic vs Bird Women's pay vs Men's pay Capital Punishment Censorship Black Lives Matter Which of those are off limits? I mean, he's not just cherry picking politics, is he?

If you're religious, please pray for them.

That's your opinion. On everything. God, heaven, etc Your opinion might be right, but you don't know if it is. It could be wrong also .

The problem I have is that I, like many Americans...do not trust the results. I think there is a difference between "being declared the winner" and "having the most votes". Just my personal opinion. Like I said...I've seen it at the small level. I saw 10k in CASH exchange hands to make sure a certain thing happened with a certain event that could have went one of two ways. When it happens at the bottom level, only a complete reetard would think "Oh...heck no.... everything is on the up and up when it comes to US politics". And the 10k....absolutely swayed the outcome of this "event" I'm referring to. And to this day....very few folks know. Actually, it came full circle. Someone did say "I heard there was money exchanged". The other party called them a jealous conspiracy theorist or something like that. And everybody around giggled, basically all agreeing that the thought of someone being paid off was silly. I just sat quietly.

Soundly defeated or end up with less votes?