Ray_T

well, Dobbs game may have looked quite a bit different if he had a healthy Jefferson to throw to. I dont care what anybody says..... You cannot replace a guy like him. I'm sure Jefferson's presence may have forced the defense to make some compromises to keep a lid on his production.

thanks for the info. I got a RB on a bye this week.

easier said than done. if thats the hand he usually uses to hold the ball it could affect ball security. They are not gonna put him out there if it means fumbles. I suspect thats why they are debating this issue now.

yes you should be concerned. but in Dobbs Defense, the Chicago D was fantastic on many levels. They controlled the LOS and Dobbs had very little time to do anything...while hes been good since coming to Minny, he hasnt had to face a D like this. The Bears D looked like a Championship calibre Defense in this game. whether they can keep this up remains to be seen but they were very impressive. I guess what I am saying is not many teams will have the ability to do what the bears did here so I'd view this as a one off. I have heard rumours circulating Dobbs may be shown the bench. I'm not sure thats the right call but if that happens you wont have a choice in the matter.

ok I guess you have your answer. given the situation, you need a QB. for what he is, Dobbs is pretty good but hes a boom or bust player and I think you want more certainty rolling into the playoffs

honestly the Chicago D is looked like a Championship Calibre Defense. we will see if they can keep this up. but a 3-3 halftime score generally means the offense isnt doing much.

I need Hockenson to have less than 14 yards receiving. Honestly its halftime and I thought I'd already have lost by now, but so far Hock has been shut out. I'd still peg my chances of winning at less than 10%

so Dobbs is your starting QB? Lawrence is an upgrade on Dobbs for sure. and honestly London wont be productive with the current QB. if this is a redraft league I'd take that deal. but if looking at Trevor Lawrence, we should also look at who is available on waivers. sometimes there are QB's on the wire who shouldnt be and Lawrence hasnt been THAT good this year.... and if you can get someone comparable on waivers, why pay when you can get comparable for free.

Flacco hasnt been bad when hes played. he started 3 games early last year averaging 300 yards and just under 2 TD per game. he played week 18. not sure if that was a relief appearance or if he started. that was a bit of a dud if it was a full game but if he came on in relief I'm not sure what to make of it. but if he puts up good starts in 3 out of 4 games thats far better than what the Browns have right now. I acknowledge the bar is low but given the sheer number of injuries to starters this year, hes not a terrible option in a 2 QB league if he indeed actually becomes the starter.

not a bad call. Even if Toney was playing I dont know that your decision should be any different.

some clubs are slow in making the designation. you have reason. you cant open a roster spot until hes designated on IR. I get that. Until that happens you are restricted in certain roster movements due to the dead roster spot.

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/bengals-place-joe-burrow-on-ir-star-qb-to-undergo-season-ending-surgery-for-torn-ligament-in-wrist/

I would say slim chance more likely he is a WR2 or WR3 depending on the quality of the QB who is now starting. At this point the QB is still a relative unknown. There is not enough info to determine how good he is at the pro level just yet. if the QB is extremely inept, Chase may not even be startable.

the coach might do a RBBC if he wants to give Pierce a shot at his job back but I think Singletary has by far been the better back this season. Based on this it should be Singletary moving forward, but Coaches often like to say you dont lose your job while injured and will give him a shot to show he deserves to start. They should start Singletary but very possible it will be RBBC

Mopeds were never cool. Not really.

I dont have a choice. I'm in a 12 team, 2 QB league. one of my starters (cousins) got hurt at roughly the same time as my backup (Tannehill) I traded for another QB (Carr) at great cost, but I dont have a backup QB. so at this point I really have no choice. This is the best of a bad lot. all the starters are rostered, so you take players you think may become the starter within a couple of weeks and hope it ends up happening.

I am in a 2 QB league. so any player who I think may emerge as a starter is a guy I want on my roster.

sorry I didnt realize I was unclear. I was talking baseball.

I am streaming TE due to the injury to Waller thought I'd poll the boys and get some opinions Otton Vs Indy Everett vs Baltimore ----> I am thinking not due to matchup Hunter Henry vs NY Giants Okonkwo vs Carolina friermuth vs Cincy Leaning toward Friermuth but Otton doesnt look bad.

he started Mahomes. the whole WR group affects his production

15 minutes of action in a 3 hour game? how can you say its boring? oh yeah..... never mind....

yeah I used him once already. funny I thought the giants should be a good matchup but using the fftoday points against by position tool apparently the Giants are pretty good at defending the TE. I'm not sure its actually a good defending thing..... I'm guessing its more a case of the WR are open all the time so why throw to a TE hahaha

yeah it was a group effort in more ways than this. nearly every one of them had a brutal drop. I am not complaining. it allowed me to win a fantasy game I probably should have lost but the Chiefs WR group has been absolutely brutal for dropped passes.

come this time of year there is always the chance for a bad weather game. when that happens the run game becomes a bit more of a priority. not saying to expect huge numbers but maybe a bit more than what we have seen so far.

and Jeudy has had a handful of brutal drops.