kilroy69

The president has absolute immunity for anything he does in office right? What happens if Biden has seal team 6 kill them both? I am not advocating for this. Just to make sure. My question is there is nothing now that would act as a check or balance on this right? He COULD do this right now.

Part of his official duties? He could argue that once elected president anything he does is part of his official duties. Breathing is part of his official duties. Shitting his pants and sniffing little girls. Yep. Part of his official duties

I would absolutely say this is correct. White women have the luxury of being supported is what it boils down to. MAYBE you should be demanding more from your black men instead of HAVING to be more disciplined.

What I find amusing is that when Trump was in office every loss for the democratic party was a referendum on Trump and the republicans. Suddenly nothing is being said about how this crushing defeat is a referendum on democratic policies. NPR is hilarious this morning though. They are doing everything they can do cover the Trump win and not cry. The MSM really came out of the woodwork to push harris and none of it worked.

Yep. Because the cowboys are a secondary wr away from making the playoffs. Good job Jerry

muuhhhhhaaahahahaaha Henrys odds for OPOY just turned negative for the first time all year. He was +6000 to start the year. He is -145 now.

The liberal media is pulling out all the stops

oh when trump wins the MSM is going to freak out. It is going to be the end of the world and it will be the fault of men. They will run stories about how the US is misogynistic

If flacco struggles OR they drop out of the playoff race the coaching staff is likely to toss richardson back in to get valuable game reps.

This is one of my favorite songs and I play it at least once a week while at work

Josh Gordon would like to have a word with him.

Places like the Wapo, NPR, CNN, MSNBC are the worst. We talk all the time about how Russia and China interferes with the elections but we never talk about how the media interferes on a routine basis and masks their opinion as news coverage. At this point as many people believe TMZ more than any newspaper because they actually report. I am VERY comfortable with the media NOT endorsing ANYONE from EITHER party. That is not their job. Encourage people to vote but do not chose sides.

What I think is so amusing about this is that the media will look at you with a straight face and tell you that they are the backbone of a democracy. Then turn around and be biased for something they like.

“The non-endorsement undermines the integrity of the editorial board and every single endorsement we make.” Ohhhhh that is funny. She thinks that the public looks at them as those who have integrity. That is a fallacy. 40 percent of the population has no faith in the media. Instead of endorsing ANY candidate why not just encourage people to vote. It is not the job of the media to endorse ANYONE. Atop editor at the Los Angeles Times, California’s largest newspaper, resigned Wednesday over a growing rift surrounding that paper’s decision to not make a presidential candidate endorsement in the run-up to the November election. Word of editorials editor Mariel Garza’s resignation first hit social media early Wednesday and has since been confirmed by the Columbia Journalism Review. Garza’s resignation from the LA Times comes after reports of direct influence over the editorials section by Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong, the biotech billionaire who’s owned the newspaper since 2018. Soon-Shiong reportedly blocked plans for the newspaper’s editorial arm (which operates independently from the newsroom) to endorse Kamala Harris for president over Donald Trump, as reported by Semafor earlier this week. Garza told the Columbia Journalism Review that she disagreed with the editorial interjection by the owner and felt that “standing up” against the decision was necessary. “I want to make it clear that I am not okay with us being silent,” Garza told Sewell Chan (a previous editorial page editor for the LA Times) of the Columbia Journalism Review. “We do not comment on internal discussions or decisions about editorials or endorsements,” a spokesperson for the LA Times told SFGATE earlier this week when asked about the lack of a presidential endorsement. “It makes us look craven and hypocritical, maybe even a bit sexist and racist,” reads Garza’s resignation letter, reprinted by the Columbia Journalism Review. “How could we spend eight years railing against Trump and the danger his leadership poses to the country and then fail to endorse the perfectly decent Democrat challenger—who we previously endorsed for the US Senate? “The non-endorsement undermines the integrity of the editorial board and every single endorsement we make.” Soon-Shiong, meanwhile, took to X on Wednesday to offer an explanation for the non-endorsement. “The Editorial Board was provided the opportunity to draft a factual analysis of all the POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE policies by EACH candidate during their tenures at the White House, and how these policies affected the nation,” the post reads in part. “Instead of adopting this path as suggested, the Editorial Board chose to remain silent and I accepted their decision,” the post concludes. The Los Angeles Times has endorsed a presidential candidate every election since 2008, and this year, the editorial board did make many other down-ballot endorsements, including Adam Schiff, D-Burbank, over Steve Garvey in the U.S. Senate race. The editorials team has also vocally opposed Donald Trump in a number of ways, including a “Top 10 reasons not to vote for Donald Trump” opinion piece by columnist Jackie Calmes on Oct. 20. One state over in Nevada, the Las Vegas Review-Journal endorsed Donald Trump for president. While California is a deeply blue state politically, a formal endorsement for president still carries considerable weight — particularly during this election, given Harris’ California upbringing and career. The Trump campaign and other media outlets quickly positioned the lack of an endorsement as a negative for the Harris campaign, with Newsweek saying that the vice president was “dealt a blow” by not receiving an endorsement from the largest newspaper in her home state. Other people called the decision to not endorse a candidate “deplorable.” This is not the first time that Soon-Shiong, who purchased the paper for $500 million in 2018, has exerted pressure that led to the resignation of a high-ranking editor. In January of this year, Kevin Merida, the paper’s top editor, stepped down over concerns surrounding Soon-Shiong’s attempt to influence a coming news story about an acquaintance of the owner.

Henry has 145 carries which puts him on pace for around 300 carries in the regular season which is something he can do with ease. Getting a bye would likely rest him more than limiting his carries in games they should be winning.

The colts would have been better off sitting him from the start to allow him to grow and mature behind a good QB. Instead they forced him in there when he was not even a good college qb. If he could have sat from the start like mahomes or love he would have had a much better chance to actually learn how to be a qb instead of a rb with a big arm

Fixed

Washington Post reporter ‘heartbroken’ after mom cancels subscription over nixed Harris endorsement: ‘Hurting us, not our owner’ Liberals really do not want to have an independent newspaper. They want an echo chamber that reinforces their ideas are right.

I mean to be fair. The cowboys are really just helping out their fanbase. Instead of setting them up for heartbreak when Dak chokes late in the season, they are just getting it over early.

no need for it. The balls have chips in them that have gps. There is no room for error.

Not sure man. The idiot in Baltimore would like a word. The ONLY times the ravens have lost is when Henry does not get 20 carries. How many carries did Henry get? 11. What happened? They lost of course. That is a DIRECT result of pisss poor coaching. He is the best offensive weapon in football and you rush him 11 times?

It does not work unless you say it 3 times like swiper no swipe. Or beetlejuice

More than anything I really feel like that layoff killed him. Had he been allowed to be around football and practice I think he would have come out of it ok. Had he used that time to pay some practice squad players to come work out with him he would have been fine. Instead he likely just sat at home and got fat. His brain lost the ability to read coverages which in turn made him uncork bad throws. He is a broken QB that will likely not even be able to get back to replacement level and certainly not a high level ever again.

It really looked like they had it down. It is really simple. Any game they give henry 20 carries in they win. Any game they do not they lose. Lamar is great but that threat of henry makes the game a lot easier and if they are not going to use him like dumb focks they get what they deserve just like today. No way should they have lost to the browns. ANY game you do not make henry the focal point and then play action off that you are fuckingg stupid. The coach will come out and say something like we needed to get henry more touches but really the ravens let the browns get into their heads and play a game they are clearly not good at. The only good thing is that barkley did not have a great game and henry still got a rushing td in a crappy game so those of us betting on him to be OPOY can still see him in the lead for that.

The ravens coaching staff lost them that game. They gave the best offensive weapon in football 11 carries and dropped back Jackson 30 times. That is absolutely nonsense. Henrry still scored but he averaged 6.6 ypc and they did not even try to get him involved. They deserved to lose that game