Showboat

I'd try to pick up Caleb to start this week and probably drop Tua

I'd be careful putting much faith in Berry statistics (I think he even does an annual article citing stats that show the superiority of a clearly inferior player demonstrating that stats can generally be used to support whatever opinion you want). The Jets wouldn't scare me away from Egbuka (I'd be more concerned about Sutton against the Chargers), but he is on the injury report now so that would be something to monitor.

Probably not enough info to make a complete evaluation. It seems reasonable, but I think I'd prefer keeping the RB depth and selling higher after a spike week or it might allow you to flip JT or Henry for an elite WR.

I really want to start Stevenson in a home game against the Steelers who haven't been able to stop anyone on the ground. Who goes to the bench? C.Brown @Vikings who have looked like crap for 7 out of 8 quarters and just got gashed by the Falcons. C.Sutton @Chargers after his total dud in week 2 - will he rebound against a solid D? T.McLaurin v.Raiders on a short week which seems like a good "get right" opportunity, but Daniels is now gimpy.

At what point do you start believing? I think you go with Jones, even though the Titans D has been tougher on opposing QBs than the Steelers so far.

You must be thinking of week 1 when he did play decently for 1 quarter. Yesterday, he was pretty much lost 100% of the time.

FU to Sutton - thanks for the 6 yards.

No doubt - it's actually tempting to target them next week with the likes of Rhamondre.

Fields

FU to me for not trusting my initial instincts and sending McLaurin to the bench.

In my head I know that sticking with McLaurin is the percentage play and I'll be kicking myself if he puts up another 2-27-0 while LaPorta goes for 5-50-1, but I'd be kicking myself more if McLaurin goes off for 6-102-2. Thx.

At some point, the drops affect the QB confidence and he starts sending those targets elsewhere (and not sure Jeudy has as long of a leash as, say, C.Lamb).

That would be bold. I'm leery of McLaurin on a short week, but Daniels will likely have opportunities to do damage with his legs - think I'd stick with Daniels.

There is not really much to say and you seem to have made up your mind. It's kind of a coin-flip to me though I would lean towards Nix. If there is one thing the Giants can do well, it is get after the passer and they handled Daniels reasonably.

As mentioned, cannot really make a trade evaluation without context, but I'll play assuming you are just looking for total point projections for the two players. It's close because Irving has the most historical TD production. Still, I'd go with Nabers/McBride as I think they both have higher potential ceilings, especially in PPR.