Showboat

Maybe you should start blackmailing NFL TEs: pay up or I'll get you on my fantasy team.

I'd try to pick up Caleb to start this week and probably drop Tua

I'd be careful putting much faith in Berry statistics (I think he even does an annual article citing stats that show the superiority of a clearly inferior player demonstrating that stats can generally be used to support whatever opinion you want). The Jets wouldn't scare me away from Egbuka (I'd be more concerned about Sutton against the Chargers), but he is on the injury report now so that would be something to monitor.

Probably not enough info to make a complete evaluation. It seems reasonable, but I think I'd prefer keeping the RB depth and selling higher after a spike week or it might allow you to flip JT or Henry for an elite WR.

At what point do you start believing? I think you go with Jones, even though the Titans D has been tougher on opposing QBs than the Steelers so far.

You must be thinking of week 1 when he did play decently for 1 quarter. Yesterday, he was pretty much lost 100% of the time.

FU to Sutton - thanks for the 6 yards.

No doubt - it's actually tempting to target them next week with the likes of Rhamondre.

Fields

FU to me for not trusting my initial instincts and sending McLaurin to the bench.

For a player that always seems to be an after-thought in the WAS game plans, going to GB on a short week after the holdout and week 1 garbage production scares me. I’d have to go with either: LaPorta v. CHI Tillman @ BAL (expect the Ravens to stomp on the Browns after the SNF debacle) Stevenson @ MIA (ugh)

In my head I know that sticking with McLaurin is the percentage play and I'll be kicking myself if he puts up another 2-27-0 while LaPorta goes for 5-50-1, but I'd be kicking myself more if McLaurin goes off for 6-102-2. Thx.

At some point, the drops affect the QB confidence and he starts sending those targets elsewhere (and not sure Jeudy has as long of a leash as, say, C.Lamb).

That would be bold. I'm leery of McLaurin on a short week, but Daniels will likely have opportunities to do damage with his legs - think I'd stick with Daniels.

There is not really much to say and you seem to have made up your mind. It's kind of a coin-flip to me though I would lean towards Nix. If there is one thing the Giants can do well, it is get after the passer and they handled Daniels reasonably.

As mentioned, cannot really make a trade evaluation without context, but I'll play assuming you are just looking for total point projections for the two players. It's close because Irving has the most historical TD production. Still, I'd go with Nabers/McBride as I think they both have higher potential ceilings, especially in PPR.

Not sure if Charbonnet is a stash - he may have already taken over the lead role in Seattle.

It would be good to get Hollywood (for at least the next few weeks). Judkins is a lotto ticket, but may have more potential upside than any others listed. I'd keep Reed.

Not sure why Washington signed the extension. Most teams at least try to feature a player after a big extension like that (even when the holdout ends the day before gameday). Is McLaurin just going to be an expensive decoy?

Is McCarthy finally the QB that saps all value from JJ?

FU to CBS for eliminating the ticker (they used to at least have that going for them over FOX)..

FU Russ for for making Nabers worthless as feared.

Dimes could falter and ARich could finally get it. Milroe is worth a flier, but probably a year away. Cousins could get traded.

I'm hoping he ends up being this year's Puka Nacua (the day 3 pick that turns into a star).

The above answers are probably correct, but you could do worse than targeting Croskey-Merritt as a late round flyer.