TBayXXXVII

How does the results of the DEI initiative not convince people that the Democrat Party platform's sole purpose is to create and capitalize on victimhood? Arguments: According to a the far-left activists group, the ACLU, DEI(A)'s purpose was to: So, DEI(A), was supposed to help people (mainly of color), but also women, at the expense of men (mainly white), but also Asians. So, it promotes racism and discrimination. Aside from that fact, let's focus on the results. The results were that white women were substantially the biggest beneficiary. Looking at this from the perspective of the purpose of the agenda, the past and present remarks of special interest groups and party leaders, they claim that DEI is successful and working. As we, from the outside looking at things, we should see.... Women, mainly white, saying that thanks to DEI women are no longer oppressed and equal. - Note, we're not seeing that. Minorities, mainly black, saying that thanks to DEI, they're getting better treatment. - Note, they are saying that... but the results are not bearing that out. In fact, it's worse. Blacks are being less helped than before, to the benefit of mainly, white women. Women (especially white), are being given special treatment, yet the "Progressive" message is that they're still oppressed. How, they've been getting special treatment? Black people were flat out lied to by the "Progressive" arm of the country, yet the "Progressive" message is that the Conservatives are the problem (even though they're the ones who pushed against the agenda that didn't help [and actually hurt], black people). Just curious on how our left-wingers don't see the reality that the Democrat party actively tries to create victims and then capitalize on them? Also curious as to why @peenie has supported a party that has literally lied to her, her entire life, and still makes policies promotes the degradation of the black community.

Terrible.

She's definitely not retiring because she wants to. She's retiring because she lost control of her party to people more extreme than her. Schumer will be next.

Got it. No one wants to talk about platform... just "But Trump". So much for that.

I never said he hired based on merit, I said he's the opposite of DEI. There's no "diversity", "equity", or "inclusion". It's all about who agrees with him and do they convince him that they could do the job.

Go argue with @SaintsInDome2006. He said Trump was a DEI guy. I said he wasn't. Glad we agree.

From knowing Trump a little bit, he's not like that. He hires people that agree with him and doesn't give two sh!tz about race or gender. He wants to surround himself with people who will find ways to get done what he wants, plain and simple. That's not DEI, it's closer to the exact opposite.

... Democrats voted for Democrats.

Someone should remind Obama that one of the people who got elected said he'd love to kill someone else and watch his children die in their mother's arms.... and a person who endorsed said candidate.

I believe in states rights. I hope they get what they voted for. Not sure where the issue is.

Just more proof that it's the left moving further left and not the right moving further right.

Then let him retire. He can give up the money he was supposed to make for the rest of the year and next year as well as give back a portion of his bonus money. He's not going to help the Saints by being on the team. He even saves the team $15M next year. At worst, it's addition by subtraction.

From my standpoint, I didn't expect Tampa to do anything. At this point in time, it appears my expectations were met. From the Saints standpoint, that team is going the wrong way. Their best players are getting older and/or approaching new deals. They should've traded everyone that had value.

They should empty the cartridge like the Jets. Trade Kamara, Olave, etc. Get as many picks as you can.

Well, when you have a 4'-10" 90lb woman trying to move a 6'-10" 225lb, you may have to improvise.

Imagine saying to your team, "I want to be traded". Then, after a couple months, they say "We gave you want you wanted... we traded you". The range of emotions would be fun to watch when he hears, "To Jacksonville". From one bad team with a bad QB to another bad team with a bad QB, just 2k miles east. Poor guy. At least he'll be a free agent after the season.

No, I had it right.

Yup, glad we agree.

Nah, it's just knowing for a fact that the Democrat party is the worst political party that this planet has ever witnessed and they're full of complete scumbags.

I'm ok with keeping out foreign born people completely. But if they're legally born here, I'm not in favor of preventing anyone from anything.

Of course it's dumb to you, because you're not a smart person. Just for clarification, those people still have a time and opportunity to vote though, right?

LOL, no one in reality actually believes that.

No, I think they're trying to show the independent voters (as well as the non-voters to become voters), across the state, that Republican voters and their candidates are evil and that Sherrill needs the votes. Those people in those areas affected by the bomb threats will get to vote and have their votes counted at some point, whether it be at a different polling location or date. They won't have to forfeit their votes.

Yup, you can have the W. Enjoy.

Sherrill supporters.