TBayXXXVII

If the exchange doesn't matter, as in, a simple text to someone or a group that was a one-off, I delete it. Otherwise, I keep them.

Oh the irony. LOL

Correct, she isn't justifying their actions and saying they were right. What she's doing is defending them in saying they shouldn't be held accountable for those actions. A comparison would be someone saying "Derek Chauvin was wrong, but just let him go".

Which means they're grouping "same sex" relationships together as a whole. They're not differentiating between the two. It should change the equation for you.

LOL, you're such a dope.

Still not the same. Your link doesn't work, but I'm willing to take your word for it in the text. That said, it groups gay and lesbian so that doesn't work for me if you're going to single out lesbians (like you did in your "Fun Fact"). Also, a bisexual relationship involves a man, so again, if you're singling out lesbians, none of the data you posted supports your claim.

There's a graphic on that dudes twitter feed that says Patel said that. If I look at Patel's twitter feed, there's nothing there. Sorry, I just don't believe the source.

I don't know who Mario Nawfal is, so I don't trust his account. In his own tweet, he's putting quotes as if Patel said something... but quotes Patel's tweet that does not state what he has. If he wants to quote Patel, then just retweet his post. This is a reason why I don't like or trust social media. If I see a Patel or Bondi tweet with them specifically saying that Epstein was an FBI informant, then I'll believe them... by I won't believe some random person who said that Patel or Bondi said it.

I think it's funny that TrollGuy was whining about Trump trying to censor Reid and it turned out that it was MSNBC who actually did it.

I think that's funny, but that's just wasting time trolling the leftists.

I didn't hear or read that, but I do remember that being asked about a few months after his "suicide".

It's like I said, the left is controlled by a conglomerate of people we don't know. They need controllable morons in the White House to jump when they say jump. Tapper wrote of focking book of how the Biden admin made a victim of everyone. GTFOH. Everyone knew Biden was cooked, the Dems lied, the media lied, and half of the population sucked it up. It's clear that the true Democrat leaders are behind the scenes running the show and using buyable stooges to do their bidding.

Your link from the NIH is among college students, not the entire population. Your second link is over 10 years old, and the last one is 15 years old. Here's a link from the NIH from a little over a year ago. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK499891/#:~:text=There are more cases of,higher risk of domestic violence. Direct quote: Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgender Domestic violence occurs in gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender couples, and the rates are thought to be similar to a heterosexual woman, approximately 25%. There are more cases of domestic violence among males living with male partners than among males who live with female partners. Females living with female partners experience less domestic violence than females living with males. Transgender individuals have a higher risk of domestic violence. Transgender victims are approximately two times more likely to experience physical violence. Looks to me like I nailed it.

Before steroids, Bonds was a H.O.F.er.

Thanks for proving my point that liberals are such suckers as per the irony of your post.

Probably because women are nuts, but that's only a guess. Seriously though, I'm thinking it's not accurate. Women aren't physically as violent as men. I have a hard time believing that lesbians would have a higher rate of domestic violence than heterosexual men or even gay men. If I had to guess most likely to least likely to be involved it would be... 1. Transgenders (w/anyone), because it is a mental illness. Those people need help. I'd fully expect half of these relationships to involve domestic violence. 2. Gay men, because men still are men. Two of them means double the likelihood. Now, I'm guessing the physical damage would be less, but the occurrence rate, I'd expect to be the 2nd most frequent. 3. Heterosexual relationships. Because men are stupid. 4, Lesbians, because women aren't that violent. I'd expect them to have the highest non-report occurrences though.

Boring... I never heard of the vast majority of those people.

Started reading that article, I bailed. He’s literally playing the victim. We WeRe LiEd To!!!

He, as well as both Hillary and Bill campaigned on building a "barrier", between the US and Mexico... and that was 'ok', because a "barrier" and a "wall" are (D)ifferent.

I don't think there's a single person that Obama nor Harris wouldn't have thrown under the bus, if it meant getting Trump. If the Epstein list came out in October with Trump on it, Harris wins in November, I have no doubt of that. There's a strong likelihood that most of the scum that went to Epstein Island are white politicians and Hollywood A-listers (any race), and Harris and Obama, as big of racists that they are, they'd throw every one of them under the bus to Harris in the White House.

They were "Democrats", not "Leftists" nor were they trolls.

Exactly. If Trump was on that list, there's a 0.0% chance Obama doesn't put it out there in 2016.... unless Bill and Hillary were on it.... Even still, Biden's DOJ has been going after Trump since the day he took office. If Trump were on the list, his DOJ absolutely would put it out there, prior to the election.

You'd be wasting your time with her too, lol. But in this case, he's also a troll. He knows he's full of crap with his posts and doesn't care, no matter how many times you prove it to him.

You should ask yourself, why are you even bothering to respond to his post. You're wasting your time. Even far left "media" outlets state that there's no evidence that Trump was ever at Epstein Island.

Liberals are such suckers. Is there anyone in the country that liberals HATE more than Donald Trump? Hillary would sell out her husband, Pelosi would sell out hers, Harris & Obama would sell out everyone, to take Trump down. If the Democrats had any proof that Trump was actually involved in Epstein's affairs or parties, it would've come out by now. If not in the Republican primaries in 2015, then the general election in 2016. If not then, it would've come out during one of the two impeachment trials. If not then, it would've surfaced during the 2020 election. If not then, it would've come up this past election. Clearly, there's no evidence tying Trump to Epstein.