Jump to content

TBayXXXVII

Members
  • Content Count

    22,588
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by TBayXXXVII

  1. TBayXXXVII

    Trump talk only- no Eagles talk allowed (Steelers talk is OK though)

    I'm calling you out as being ignorant. You've posted many times how hard it was living in Newark/Bergen County. About the racism and everything else. Newark/Bergen County is the darkest blue town and county in the state. You've NEVER come across a Republican in government or in a government building in your life up there. If you've actually faced racism that you claimed, it was ALL from Democrats. Yet, you've always voted for Democrats in NJ and because it sucked up there, you moved to a red state in Georgia and proceeded to vote for the same people that you hated up in NJ. NOW, you have the audacity to call Republican's racist. YOU MA'AM, can just, S.T.F.U.
  2. TBayXXXVII

    Trump talk only- no Eagles talk allowed (Steelers talk is OK though)

    I've said multiple times that there are always 537 corrupt people in DC, at all times. I never defend a person, I always defend policies. I do call out hypocrisy... just I always get a "yeah but" thrown at me or a "whataboutism". After a while, I just started doing that back to them. Tired of their b.s. They can fock off for all I care.
  3. TBayXXXVII

    Trump talk only- no Eagles talk allowed (Steelers talk is OK though)

    Exactly. Funny thing is, they never actually voted for this one... and we're the anti-Democracy group.
  4. TBayXXXVII

    Trump talk only- no Eagles talk allowed (Steelers talk is OK though)

    You've lived your whole life surrounded by liberals and faced racism... yet, it's the Republican's, right? s.t.f.u.
  5. TBayXXXVII

    Trump talk only- no Eagles talk allowed (Steelers talk is OK though)

    You and I see the same thing, so stop with your b.s.
  6. TBayXXXVII

    Trump talk only- no Eagles talk allowed (Steelers talk is OK though)

    In the 90's, the Republican's called out Clinton for it. The Democrats said it was nothing. Trump does it, Democrats say it's a problem. Republican's said, wait, I thought you said it wasn't. Kamala does it, and she's called out for it, and those people are called "sexist". What do you see going on here?
  7. TBayXXXVII

    Trump talk only- no Eagles talk allowed (Steelers talk is OK though)

    LOL, you have SSSOOOOO brainwashed.
  8. TBayXXXVII

    Trump talk only- no Eagles talk allowed (Steelers talk is OK though)

    In a conversation with Commie Tim, I said the stance of the Democrat party was, 'anyone who disagreed with Obama, only did so because they were racist'. I asked in this thread, "How long until someone who disagrees with Harris is called racist, just because they disagree with her. Then you and a couple others did it. That was my point.
  9. TBayXXXVII

    Trump talk only- no Eagles talk allowed (Steelers talk is OK though)

    So the left is the one who decides this? It's ok to call out Trump for banging a porn star while married... but you're going to say we're sexist for calling out a woman who was banging a married man to get ahead, right?
  10. TBayXXXVII

    Trump talk only- no Eagles talk allowed (Steelers talk is OK though)

    Actually, we're laughing at how stupid you guys are. Trump is/was anti-Democracy, right? That's the claim, is it not? How many votes from the public did Harris get to be on the ticket in November?
  11. TBayXXXVII

    Trump talk only- no Eagles talk allowed (Steelers talk is OK though)

    LOL, figured as much. The irony of the Left is amazing. The Democrat party has not being anti-racist in this country, ever. Ever. Meaning, they're still the racist ones now. Yet, you sit on your pedestal and shout at the others, while pretending they are not. When you deny it, just know that I'm calling you a liar and full of crap, so no need to respond.
  12. TBayXXXVII

    Trump talk only- no Eagles talk allowed (Steelers talk is OK though)

    Started already eh? LOL Hey @The Real timschochet, remember when you said the Democrat party was wrong for calling Republican's racist just because they disagreed with Obama? Well, you have 3 here now already doing it. I'll be eager to hear your and their "yeah but", or it's (D)ifferent.
  13. Interesting... the government that you're complaining about back then and now, who you seem to think are better for black folks, are the same ones you're still voting for.
  14. TBayXXXVII

    Trump talk only- no Eagles talk allowed (Steelers talk is OK though)

    How long until we hear 2008 all over again... "Anyone who disagrees with Harris, does so only because they're racist"? Or has that started already?
  15. TBayXXXVII

    The case against the top RBs

    You know what, I forgot Cooks was still there. I thought he went somewhere else when FA started. Yeah, 200 seems like a stretch now. LOL
  16. TBayXXXVII

    The case against the top RBs

    I'd choose Lamb in that group because he's the only guy commanding targets. I think he could hit 200 targets this year... unless he signs a new deal.
  17. TBayXXXVII

    The case against the top RBs

    Injuries are always a concern for everyone. Sure, some may be more expected, but I tend to not care unless it happens every year. McCaffrey played every game his first 3 seasons. The first time he got hurt, was the COVID year, where there was not training camp. As with a lot of star players, I think they're rushed back sooner than they should, he missed a lot of games the following year. Well, the next two, he played every game... the only game he missed last year was Week 18, where they punted. So, in 7 seasons, McCaffrey only missed games in 2 of them. In 2018, he had 328 touches and over 400 the following season. In 2022, he had over 320 touches and over 320 last year. He's shown that he can stay healthy and have consecutive workload seasons. So, he's not, and never has been a durability concern. If I'm on the clock and am taking a RB, I'm taking McCaffrey over everyone else and it's not even a debate. I like Robinson's potential in ATL and I think Allgeier being there is a good thing. It prevents Robinson from being over used. Last year, the Falcons were 3rd in the NFL in rush attempts behind only Baltimore and Chicago, both who've used their QB as RB's. I do expect them to be more efficient this year and expect them to throw more than last year, but I think they'll run more plays because they'll have longer drives, so I don't anticipate a big drop in overall rush attempts. I'm not worried about Hall's TD's because they had trash running the offense the last two seasons and the team didn't score TD's at all. I mean, I think his 9 TD total is very promising, considering that the team only scored 18 (on offense). I like the idea of my RB scoring half of his teams total TD's. Gibbs to me would be a great flex option/RB2 because I think he is a boom/bust kind of guy. He played 15 games and had 6 games where he failed to score double digits and 2 more where he was less than 13. Last year, 23 RB's averaged at least 13 fpg. I like Barkley a lot. I think his presence should scare Hurts owners and not the other way around. Kelce being gone is going to limit the number of TD's that Hurts gets and I believe Barkley will be the beneficiary. I think Barkley could end up with 15+ total TD's this season. He is someone who I would be concerned about with durability issues. I think there should be some durability concerns with Taylor, but based on the build of this team and their offseason moves, he's going to get the ball a lot. They let Moss walk and they really don't have anyone else to give the ball to that is a concern. I wouldn't say he's not a threat to catch the ball. He's averaging about 3 targets and 2.3 receptions a game. I think 40 receptions is a nice number. Me, I'm going with McCaffrey every day over everyone else. I'd rank this group as McCaffrey Hall Barkely Robinson Gibbs Taylor
  18. TBayXXXVII

    The case against the top RBs

    LOL, he offered, I just took it. Honestly, I didn't even read the whole offer. In that league, I make all kinds of draft trades to see what can happen. I think a lot of people in the league do the same. Kind of like a "what do I need to offer"/"what can I get away with", type thing for people to use as a base in their big money leagues. I may kind of screw other people up though.... I just take offers without really reading them. It's the offers that I make and deals I initiate, are the ones I care about.
  19. TBayXXXVII

    The case against the top RBs

    In my medium-competitive 10-team office league, I had the #1 pick and traded it to the guy with the #7 pick. Other than flipping firsts, I got his 2nd, 3rd, & 5th, he got my 6th, 7th, and 8th.
  20. TBayXXXVII

    So a person tried to assassinate Trump

    He probably knows Trump's going to win. He can stay Commie though. We don't want that kind associated with us.
  21. TBayXXXVII

    Trump talk only- no Eagles talk allowed (Steelers talk is OK though)

    You replied to me initially, did you not? Thanks for playing.
  22. TBayXXXVII

    Trump talk only- no Eagles talk allowed (Steelers talk is OK though)

    I'll take this as you saying: "Ok, I was just looking for a reason to argue, can't find one, so I'll move on".
  23. TBayXXXVII

    Trump talk only- no Eagles talk allowed (Steelers talk is OK though)

    I didn't say the lead it, I said they supported it. You don't remember Harris and others saying that they'd donate money to gofundme's for people to use as bail money if they got arrested? Short term memory, eh? I never said the GOP wouldn't side with him... I said they would. My point was that the Leftists in the media and DC have been telling people for years that the GOP would love to have a reason to get rid of Trump. I said they were lying. You seem to agree but don't want to say it. After Trump wins, he has no leverage with the GOP anymore as he can no longer run again. If the GOP really wanted to get rid of him, all they have to do is have a few Leftist activists concoct a reason to impeach him, like they did twice last time, and it will only take a couple people on the right to get rid of him. It actually will be pretty easy. Proving how delusional you are, I don't like Trump, he's an azzhat, but I like his policies. If the GOP did 25th him, I wouldn't care too much. In 2024, the worst people in the world, are involved in the DNC.
  24. TBayXXXVII

    Trump talk only- no Eagles talk allowed (Steelers talk is OK though)

    What's delusional is that you think the conservative populous is as demented as the liberal populous. The conservative voters do not think that the handful of moron's was as big of an issue as the wacko's on your side of the aisle. We all know and believe that the summer of 2020 was way worse and the liberals didn't just condone the activities, they supported it. True or false, if Harris is picked to run on the Democrat side and she literally shoots Trump in the face, she gets more votes than Obama in 2008? When you answer True, you can stop with the "it wouldn't matter" crap.
×