TBayXXXVII

The guy who said "metal helmets", should not be making such statements.

The Democrats agenda is to ostracize people to force compliance, not kill them. On the surface, killing is worse, but in the grand scheme of things, there's no real difference.

Here you go big guy... from the AP, not Fox or any conservative outlet. https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-democratic-national-convention-ap-fact-check-immigration-politics-2663c84832a13cdd7a8233becfc7a5f3 Took a simple google search. Let me guess though... THIS, was (D)ifferent, right? Looks like your liberal fact check was b.s., doesn't it. Oh wait, I forgot, it's (D)ifferent.

Google this.... "pride parade fight philly" Let me know how many mainstream media outlets you see covering it.

And I never said that medical insurance should cover abortion either. Now, if it's medically necessary, fine... but we're obviously talking about the absolute smallest amounts of abortions. Don't kid yourself my friend on LASIK. Most insurance companies DO NOT cover that. A time when they all do though... is when it's medically necessary. To your last sentence. Absolutely not. Never. At all. Ever. You want that, go to your preferred communist country Mr. Stalin.

LOL, liberal "fact" checking. We know it happened, stop pretending it didn't.

So you're saying that when Obama was putting kids in cages and separating them from the adults that brought them here... Biden was adamantly against it and said it publicly? Link?

Well, we know that he's just a puppet at this point, but in 2008, he was definitely not this bad.

You keep pretending that you're right... it's what helps you sleep at night.

Is there any record of him telling Obama to not do it?

Well, that's a lie... he did it from 2008 to 2016.

Every team does it... money is fungible.

That's like being charged with murder and your defense in court was "I didn't kill him your honor, I only pulled the trigger... the bullet did the killing".

The way to get it out of the political world is to stop restricting it all together (which includes government funding), as I said in my example with the degenerate scumbag... which is approximately 98% of all abortions. Abortions are no different than boob jobs or Lasik. It's 100% unnecessary and 100% optional. In those scenario's, the person getting the work done, is paying for it. If there are circumstances where a child or mother's life is at risk, then that's a medical judgement call by the doctor. If the first part of my scenario is the way it's handled, then the medical aspect is purely that, it's a medical issue between the doctor and the woman. There's no need to get the government involved... it's like any other personal health issue. If you want to pretend that the majority of cases like this involve Medicaid, you're not a very intelligent person. Now, if you want the degenerate scumbag to be able to claim her health is at risk, then all you're doing is bringing the government back into it. Which again, is evidence that the Democrats want to have control over women.

For sheep? Certainly. For the normal person, not so much.

I agree with your first two lines... but I was saying that people thinking that our current right-wing political environment is fascist, is a left-wing talking point. As for you last comments, is FNord one of your alias's... because that's a King Irony type of statement.

Contract structuring. It's not hard to push higher base pays to the back end of the deal freeing up more money now (if necessary), also, voidable years. Each of the 3 can have 1 year with a really high base pay to which, the contract can be re-negotiated to stretch out the deal. Jalen Hurts: $51M AAV AJ Brown: $32M AAV DeVonta Smith: $25M AAV 3 other players with $20M AAV each How did they make that work???? Their Top 6 AAV's total $171M+... Dallas' Top 6 are $127.5M. Right now, Dallas is projected to be almost $80M under the cap next year. They have plenty of flexibility to make it work.

Remember when liberals said they don't believe in open borders? Can't say that now, can they?

I don't see that as an issue.

Left-wing talking point.

100% of every proposal by Democrats, concerning abortion, involves the government paying for it. HENCE, the Democrat party being in control of women’s rights. Thankfully, Trump's SC appointees put us on the path to getting there by getting the Feds out of it and getting it at the state level. Next, hopefully, out of government control completely.

Yeah, I don't see it that way. The contracts that were out there already were Adams at $28M AAV and Hill at $30M AAV. There's no way he wouldn't have wanted around $35M, even before last season. At the minimum, he'd have been asking for $32M AAV, so waiting is going to cost him what... $12M over 4 years? That's nothing. It's not like Jefferson got $45M AAV. If that were the case, I'd agree with you.

How about this... instead of pretending that 0.01% of the cases are the norm, we let the degenerates kill their kid whenever they want, as long as they're the ones footing the bill? The government need not be involved at all. It'll go something like this: Degenerate scum bag: Yo doc, kill my kid. Doctor: Ok, that's be $1k. Degenerate scum bag: Ok, I'll be back in a couple weeks after I get the money from GoFundMe. Now, in the scenario which you described specifically, in those 0.01% of the cases, that would be a medical decision which the insurance company would pay for. BUT, that's only if we get abortion out of the political world and into the medical world. Or, do you liberals want to make sure these women need to have people like you in control of their rights?

Just not sure how you can make the claim that Jerry messed up. You have to be assuming that Lamb didn't want $35M AAV, which seems a little out of touch. I think this helps Dallas and makes it easier for Jones. Just say "Look, you're numbers are the same as his, we'll give you the same deal." Seems easy enough to me. Otherwise, just tag him the next 2 years and he can play on 1 year deals for 2 years and hope he doesn't get hurt. It'll still come out to the same money, so it wouldn't make sense for Lamb to say "No" to security.

Why, what was Lamb asking for?