TBayXXXVII

Normal people believe this is actually in progress.

Yes, if it's custom, the establishment pays for it... if it's generic, it's on you.

Do we know that Manning is going to (actively) play only 1 year?

2025.... I'll throw out a couple: NFC South comes down to a 3-team 10-win tie breaker for the division, the winner is the only team to make the playoffs (Saints finish with 3 wins). Dallas finishes in 4th in the NFC East NFC North has all 4 teams with 10 wins or more. Rams wins NFC West with 12 wins, SF and Seattle 10, Arizona with 8... just missing out on all 4 with a winning record. Buffalo the only team in the AFC East with at least 8 wins, Miami might hit 7. Cincinnati wins AFC North with 12 wins on a tie-breaker, Pittsburgh has 9 wins, Cleveland with 5. Houston wins 11, the rest of the division combines for 11 wins. The other 3 all pick in the top 5 of next years draft. Kansas City finishes in 3rd place in the AFC West... LAC first (12 wins), Denver and KC with 11.

Hey, it was a reasonable prediction. Don't beat yourself up about it.

Finished 3rd.

We just have different values. You want career politicians who've been lying to you for 40+ years to keep lying to you. All the while pretending that they care about you while they lie to you some more and keep taking your tax money to line their pockets. That's fine if that's why you're looking for in a president. I'm ok with someone who's pointing it out for everyone to see and pointing out where the problems are. I'd rather that happen and, over time, try to figure out the best solution than someone/some group, just keep shoveling b.s. and getting rich off of tax payers money.

What Trump said was true. Your issue is where? That he started off with an unrelated true statement before that? Let me guess, you don't think Trump was right.

Communist States of America vote to give everyone $50k a year so that they don't have to work anymore if they don't want to. Also, cost of living per year to not live in poverty, on average = $100k.

... and you want your opinions to be taken seriously.

Says the guy who listened to dopes for 4 year, who are now claiming they didn't know Biden was as bad as he was.

This is why you are a dope. While many Republican politicians don't care about the debt, there are plenty that do. Democrats only pretend to care when it's a political talking point. So yes, Republicans should talk about it. Now, I couldn't read the entire communist propaganda you linked, but from what I could read, it's "experts" who say that the bill will increase the debt. Meaning, "left-wing activists who get their talking points from the Democrat politicians".

Yes they do. They pretend to care when Republican's are proposing bills that will (accusatorially), raise the debt. As proof, your link.

I'd need more examples before I'd go that far.

I personally don't care that the city wants to do this. I think they're ignorant for it, but they can do what they want. If I were a citizen of the city, I'd vote out those who were in favor of it. Otherwise, if the idiots of that city are for it, I'm not going to stop them. Now, if they're flying the flag higher than Rhode Island's state flag or the US flag, then that just shows how out of touch with "America" they are and why communists shouldn't be elected into public office.

Yup... and the vast majority don't. That's all 535 in Congress... not just one side of the aisle or the other.

If you say so, go with that.

Last year, in the 8 games he played, he averaged 15.6 fpg which was good for QB18. I don't think Dallas did anything to "improve", at all, from last year. They still have an average OL, their WR2 is still "ok" (I don't really think Pickens is "better" than Cooks), their RB's are still 'meh', at best. Will Dak be startable? Yeah, probably. But I wouldn't want him as my QB1. Most of the leagues I play in, are 2QB leagues. I have no problem with him as my QB2. In my 1QB leagues, I won't draft him as I don't roster 2 QB's in those leagues. If he has a "big fantasy season", I'd be pretty surprised. I think he'll be better than last year, but I still expect him to fall outside of the top 15 in QB's. NOW, a caveat would be, how is the defense? If the defense is really bad and the Cowboys are playing catchup a lot and they're putting up a lot of junk yards/points, then I can see him being a back end QB1.

Not sure how they got 7. Seems it's against the rules. All those games just mean more times people can see how overrated they'll be. Tampa has 4... I'd prefer 0. I like 1 pm games. Makes Sunday more enjoyable.

I think speculation is being overly speculative. Last year, there was 113 "Prime Time" games. No team got more than 6... KC wasn't one of them. I doubt they're getting more than 6 this year... especially since it's apparently not allowed. To note, that's when the schedule is released. Teams can get more if they're flexed in.

I don't think that's allowed in the CBA. There could've been an update to that though, that I did not hear. I just looked, the number is now 6. At least half the league will have at least 4.

A lot of teams get 5, apparently that's the most allowed. There used to be a rule that every team needed at least 1 prime time game, but I'm not sure that's the case anymore. Last year, Tampa had 4.

Yup, agreed. I mean, the teams have to be good, but they yeah, you don't need Dallas/KC. If it were Cincinnati/Baltimore W1 on that first Friday, everyone is watching, just like it being KC/LAC.

I never understood why the networks would want Dallas for primetime games. The bulk of the fans turn the game off at halftime.

I'm fine with this. The tax payers are the main reason those tourist venues exist. If they can recoup some of that cost from people who don't have to pay for it, I say good for them.