TBayXXXVII

I watched this one... and another one with LGBTQ conservatives and liberals. In both videos, guess which one was the hateful, demanding, pompous bigot? Yup, you guessed it... the white liberal. LOL

Never met anyone who didn't.

No, my point was that I doubt he was the first. You need only scroll up to see that he wasn't.

Without reading all 18 pages... can I just assume that despite Democrats believing Trump should've been impeached for Russia Collusion (which was falsified info created by the Clinton campaign), and Quid pro quo (even though Biden readily admitted to literally doing just that), they think that Republican's going after Biden is an unfair political attack?

Apparently the tree did make a sound. Scroll up 2 posts.

Yeah, because EVERY family had one, right? LOL When were you born, 1995? LOL Not everyone knew of any "World Championships" for these things in 80's. I knew a ton of kids who beat all kinds of games. It was just something you did. I'm not saying millions of kids beat Tetris, but I'm sure it was done. Hey, great for this kid who did it... good for him. Good for all them. I'm just saying that I doubt he's the first.

You might be a leftist if... -- You call someone racist/xenophobic because they think we should have closed borders. You might be a leftist if... -- You think Climate Change is a "Crisis". You might be a leftist if... -- You call someone a racist for pointing out statistics. You might be a leftist if... -- You think Pro Life is "alt-right". You might be a leftist if... -- You think there are more than 2 genders. You might be a leftist if... -- You resort to -ist/-phobic/-hate name calling because you don't have a real answer. You might be a leftist if... -- You think race, gender, or ethnicity should be a consideration for anything, instead of treating everyone equally. You might be a leftist if... -- You think straight white conservative men, are evil in any way, just because they're straight white conservative men. You might be a leftist if... -- You think socialism (including "Democratic socialism"), and/or communism (or it being done "the right way"), is preferable to capitalism. You might be a leftist if... -- You think Donald Trump is any different than any other politician.

"Very blah"? "Some" talent? LOL I have no idea what they're going to do, but they need to make him a top 5 paid WR in the league, or they're going to lose him. If he hits the open market, they're screwed because someone's going to pony up a 4 year+ / $110M contract. Kansas City comes to mind immediately. I just hope that they don't have to bring Mayfield back to do it.

Donkey Kong came out 3 years before Terri's. Yeah, I know people have been always trying to beat games, but in the 80's, posting it online and on social media, was a bit hard. LOL Also, you weren't going to get the media to care about it enough to report it and home video of it wasn't really that likely either. That's really my only point here.

They had an easy schedule. The only 2 teams Tampa beat with a winning record was Jacksonville and Green Bay who aren't all that good. They lost every other game to teams with winning records. Their biggest issue is that Mayfield is a mediocre to below average QB and Bowles is a below average HEAD coach.

You don't think that the fact that teams struggle against them is the reason why they throw more? In terms of pass attempts, they rank as the 6th most passed on. It's because they know they can't run. So, yeah, teams are getting yards, but it's because they're passing a lot, because they have too and because it's easier than running against them. They rank 1st in TD's scored in the red zone (well, they were after week 15... I haven't paid attention since). I do know that Jacksonville did get 2 "oh by the way TD passes in the red zone", after the Bucs called off the dogs, being up 30-0 and the Saints got 1, so it's possible they didn't finish #1. Anyway, teams that can't run on them try to pass... well, when they need to pass to get in the end zone, they can't score.

Is that why they're 9th in points against and not, say top 3?

I was just focking with you. No, I don't think the Bucs are good... they have Baker Mayfield. I do think the Bucs are going to beat the Eagles Monday night though, but it's not because I think the Bucs are better. I think the crap going on in Philly will yield a less than expected product. The Bucs have nothing going against them. The team likes where they are and who they have. Mentally, they're in a good place. The Eagles are a mess. I think that regardless of who Tampa plays next week, the Bucs get spanked. I think that outside of Mayfield bringing the team down, the Bucs are quite good. Their biggest flaw/hole, is the middle of the OLine. Those guys blow at run blocking. Pass blocking, they, and the whole line is quite good. Their receivers are good, the backs are good, the DLine is good, etc. At every level, the team is "good", they just have a crap QB and mediocre HC. Against a team playing like crap and in turmoil, like the Eagles, I think the Bucs win. Against a good team running on all cylinders, like the Niners, I think they get spanked.

Yeah, it's been around for forever. I never knew there was a scholarship for it and back in the day, I doubt there was or if there was, it wasn't widely known. I HIGHLY doubt this kid was the first.

He's probably not the first person to beat the game, just has parents who think it's important enough to make a major case about it. "Look at me!!!"

LOL A. The woman giving birth, isn't the "mother", it's a woman giving birth to someone else's child. An agreement she made WILLINGLY. The baby isn't being "ripped away", because it's not hers. No one forced her to do anything. My body my choice, right? Or are you now against women's right to choose what they want with their body? B. When a piece of trash leftist tells me that my take is horrific, then I know I'm in the right. Not surprised you agree with the pope, because he's an idiot too. If you can't have a child because one of the two parents can't CREATE a child, then adoption is perfectly acceptable, a great idea even. If people CAN create a child but physically can't carry a child, then there's nothing wrong with asking someone if they can take on that burden. They can freely say no, and no it is. It's not that hard of a concept.

My cousin who is an eternal optimist... and a Dolphins fan, says there is no way that Miami wins in KC. The Dolphins are without all of their best edge rushers, the DB's are playing hurt... and it shows, Mostert isn't going to play, Waddle is banged up, and Tua's shoulder is banged up. To note, that's what he told me.

I just think it's funny how you say the Bucs "who aren't very good", and simply mention the Packers. Both have the same record... yet Tampa curb stomped the Packers in Green Bay. I'd think if someone said Tampa wasn't very good, they'd say something like "the crappy Packers".

Got it. Good for me, not for thee. Yeah, I'm the pathetic one.

Wild Card winners: Buffalo, KC, Cleveland, Detroit, Dallas, Tampa Division round winners: Buffalo, Baltimore, San Fran, Detroit Conference Champ winners: Buffalo, Detroit Super Bowl winner: Detroit

I'm going with, because there's nothing there. Hence, my original post to the tweet as being essentially a troll job.

I think the Pope's point of view is very ignorant. The mother isn't being exploited... the mother is the one initiating the surrogacy. If the woman wants a baby but can't carry the baby, but can find someone willing to do it for her, then she should be able to. She's not being taken advantage of... she's taking advantage of other options. She's not the victim. Please. If a woman wants a child and can pay for it, let her do it. If the other woman wants to do it, let her do it. You have a couple who want to have a child, pay, and care for it. There's no issue here. Which is exactly what surrogacy does. Talk about contradictions!

And Russia Collusion... and elections being stolen (see Clinton/Abrams).

Got it. So people who participated in his actions aren't culpable for those actions?

Oh the irony!