TBayXXXVII

W/L wise, the season played out almost exactly how I expected. Minnesota was the only game wrong. I did expect them to split with Atlanta and New Orleans, but I figured the home teams would win, not the road. Had they lost the road games and won the home games like I expected, they'd have started the season 2-4 after the Atlanta game and I think losing at Buffalo and going 2-5 would've sealed the deal on Mayfield. Even if not, losing at Houston the following week and going 2-6 would have. But, winning that game where Minnesota shot themselves in the foot and the Saints crapping the bed at home, saved his season. In the end though, they're an 8/9-win team. It's what I'd expect from a team that has 11-win talent being lead by a QB with 6-win talent.

I think the Eagles win at least 1 playoff game. Not sure if it'll be a home game or not, but they'll win at least 1.

I'm not surprised that's the price you're paying. For the cheap seats in Philly, they're around $100 just for the regular season. The fact that you're paying only $72 per ticket sounds like a steal. If the Eagles end up winning the division, I'm willing to bet that the cheapest seat in the house for that first game will be at least $200 (from the Eagles). Re-sale will probably go for $300+. https://www.vividseats.com/eagles-playoff-tickets--sports-nfl-football/custom/158

I have no problem with this. States Rights. This is how it should be done, not force fed at the federal level. It will also help promote political segregation. Communist states and American states. It should help keep the Communist party out of the White House.

Link

The NCCA needs to separate football from "Conference alignment". It's going to destroy the athletic landscape. We're at the point where the only 2 real conferences are the SEC and Big 10. The Pac10 is done, the ACC is done, the Big 12 is done. Every remaining "good" football program in those other 3 conferences, will at some point be in the other 2. We're going to have a 20-team Big 10, a 20 team SEC and the ACC, Big 12, and Pac10 will eventually become mid-majors.

I don't know why this is so hard to grasp by some.

In 2016, Trump lost to Hilary by less than 5% of the vote, something like 120k votes (similar to Romney to Obama in 2012). That gap may not be that hard to overcome considering that lack of faith / support Biden apparently has. In both 2016 & 2020, Trump got 1 electoral vote from Maine.

Yes, the Supreme Court should allow the states to do as they wish... BUT, not at the cost of violating someone's rights. There's no issue here. The Supreme Court should ALWAYS... 100% of the time, side with someone's rights over the government - at ANY level.

I don't read liberal sites, when a board communist said it was a bi-partisan measure, then I assumed that elected Republicans were involved as well.

I don't care if they do or don't, my main point was that the people involved at the state level (who are Republican's), should be recalled. If the measure went through, then the right thing to do by the public is to write him in.

While it is not "official", the lawmakers in Maine and Colorado are planning to have Trump not on the ballot. A scenario where that happens, is what I'm referring to for the write-in ballots.

Yes.

We can't end racism until people stop voting for Democrats.

Every Republican in Colorado and Maine, who actually cares about democracy, should sign a recall petition against every Republican involved in taking Trump off the ballot. Then, come November, every one of them should write-in Trump, forcing the states to count a million+ (in CO), write-in's and over a 100k in Maine. The ONLY reason to push this, is because the powers that be in those states, think Trump is going to take the state.

FIFY

Oh, I agree, but you'll never hear anyone on the left who thinks that the news they're getting is bias. Well, that's not true. They do know there's a "slight" bias. LOL

Liberals don't see the media bias... they just see Fox News as the ones who lie.

That may be. I haven't watched many Chargers games.

The result may have been to some. But that game was pretty crappy. To someone with no hat in the ring, wanting to watch "good football", they were disappointed.

It's not possible for a liberal to say that a man can't get pregnant because they're all in lock step that if a woman says she's a man, then she's a man... period. If that woman gets pregnant, by proxy, a man has to be able to be pregnant. So, in essence, a liberal must either say a man can get pregnant or they say there are two genders and women can't be men. No liberal EVER says the second part, so they must then subscribe to "Men can get pregnant".

Liberalism, today, is leftism. They get 0 benefit of the doubt from me. If a liberal says they don't think men can get pregnant, they're only saying that in an environment where they feel threatened.

You just have more faith in liberals than I do.

I think your percentages are too optimistic. I think the numbers are closer to... 15% aren't afraid to be honest. 35% have an opinion but are deathly afraid of the woke mob. 50% are just crazy people who buy into anything or live for virtue points. I don't think there are any liberals who are worthy of giving the benefit of the doubt to.

I have a feeling the Chiefs know this (not specific to fantasy, but know they need a WR... BAD), and they're going to write Mike Evans a blank check in the off-season.