TBayXXXVII

So what you really mean is that you agree with Trump, but since you're not allowed to, you have to change the way you think? LOL

Imagine being Fnord as he describes everything he believes in, which align with Trump and the Republican party. But he votes against him and the person he voted for, is against everything that he believes in!!!! Classic!

You can't have equality until you treat everyone equally. You're promoting the continuation of racism and inequality. Odd how you preach against it.

There isn't a problem with diversity in of itself. The problem is forcing it to happen arbitrarily.

I'd be ok with that. Of the 3 leagues I'm in, I'm playing against Ekeler in the playoffs right now in all 3. Has no impact on me if he's great the rest of the season. LOL

Trump said essentially the same thing as you... has to be one or the other. Can't be both, can't be neither.

Exactly

You're not helping, by adding more conspiracy theories.... as @Dizkneelande just pointed out.

The biggest conspiracy theory we've had in decades, if not ever... was Russia Collusion. Pretty sure that was the MSM who pushed that.

So then vote for Trump... that's what he tried to do.

Interesting.... so when Trump said this the left wing media (and people like Biden, AOC, and other prominent Democrats on the Hill), called Trump a racist and xenophobic. So, my question to you is, are you racist and xenophobic or did the left wing media and prominent Democrat politicians lie about Trump?

No, it's still a win for Democrats. Illegal immigration hurts low income earning black folks at a much higher rate than anyone else in this country. Democrats NEED black people to be suffering. It's the only way they can really push their "you're racist" agenda.

We need to wipe Washington DC clean. In 2024, elect 537 new people. No one allowed to run for re-election. Constant impeachments is annoying. We know that on January 22nd, 2025, the day after Trump's inauguration, the Democrats are going to file for impeachment. Can't we just get rid of all of them?

Someone should ask the writer why he thinks the NFL segregating officials by race, is "finally getting something right".

So you're saying that one of the most liberal cities in the country is also one of the most racist towards blacks? Shocking!!!!!

Exactly... and Trump was the fascist. LOL

Just proves my point that there are not just 537 people in federal government (House, Senate, and WH), there are 537 corrupt people in federal government.

Environmentalists, oddly, aren't very bright when it comes to the environment... are they?

Doubt it, but they would be better than 3-10. Maybe 5-8.

I think the bigger issue is that all 3 have crappy QB's... Mac Jones, Daniel Jones, and Garoppolo aren't that good (pre-injury), and their backups aren't anything special either.

This. It's why I say that Fantasy sports is virtually all luck. You can only make a prediction based on past experience. It never takes into account human nature/impact and never takes into account weather. When I say weather, I mean historically. Sure, in this weeks Green Bay/Tampa game in Green Bay, we'll know the weather. Anyone remember what the weather was last year in their Week 3 matchup in Tampa? I don't. Willing to bet no one else does either, unless they somehow got screwed by a player in that game. Also willing to be that all these "experts" don't really track the weather either. That's why they all say, "Well, it's going to be windy in Green Bay on Sunday, so you may want to temper your expectations". They never say, "Well, last year when these two met in Tampa, there were really high winds from the coming hurricane, and everyone sucked that day, so they're all likely to suck on Sunday".

Good idea. That would solve a lot of the problems on city streets.

Yeah, a freak incident then. It happened to my son when he was 4, but he was really sick at the time, so it wasn't completely unexpected. Very scary when it happens.

Right, it would point to the manufacturer as the guilty party. What are the odds that the government will force the manufacturer be the party at fault? I'm going with 1 in a billion chance... you? So, if the consumer is the one that's responsible, then the manufacturer shouldn't be allowed to put it on the market without almost a 100% reliability factor.

To him, or are you saying "in general"? The people who are more susceptible to this are tall / thin people & smokers... assuming he didn't get hurt, have lung cancer, or went scuba diving recently.