TBayXXXVII

Willing to bet that the Prosecutor and the Judge would've raised their hand to the first one and "Yes" to Question 34 too. I think they should be excused as well.

LOL, nice dodge. Everything that happened to Trump, that's in the media and in court, was/is Democrat driven. There never would've been accusations of him being racist, misogynistic, or anything else splattered all over the MSM for months on end. There never would've been a Steele Dossier and there never would've have a Russia Collusion diatribe. You know this and you're trying to pretend it would've happened anyway. Just stop.

That's pretty communistic. Not surprised really.

Ok, so you're going with denial. That's fine.

I know... Bill Clinton did it, why can't Trump?

Look, just because the DNC screwed over Bernie, it doesn't mean they'd have done the same with Trump. If he had been in lock step with the party like he was during the Bill Clinton years, Hillary may never have even been on the radar. That being said, I said he was the President in 2016... didn't say who he beat in the primary, I'm just saying he won in November 2016. You and I both know that if he was, there never would have been a Russia Collusion investigation, right? We BOTH know that? We also both know that the media wouldn't have called him a racist or xenophobic, or anything of the kind... even if he ran the exact same Presidency. We BOTH know that, right?

He still has another year after this one. The thing is, he only has 1 full year as a starter under his belt. His first year, he only played 5 games. There isn't a team in the league who'll give him a $60M AAV (or even $40M AAV), after 27 total games. He needs to play this year. Next year, that's a different story.

Good post... I think you got one thing wrong, but overall, you're pretty spot on.

Makes sense. Prosecution wants to make sure that the only type of jury tampering gets done by them.

Let me know when they go to court in Delaware because the government decide to prosecute them, and then I'll recant.

The irony of a guy who was sleeping with a Chinese spy, calling out a private citizen. LOL

Irony is the catch of the day, every day, for the left I see.

I'm certainly not saying I think Dak is worth $60M, I'm simply saying that's the number I've heard thrown around while listening to NFL Radio... and that's by the pundits and guests, not fans. I think every team that has success is there because all the right pieces fit. That said, just because I think that, and you apparently, it doesn't mean the players feel that way. They have a much bigger ego, and I can understand why... they're there after all. I think there are players that see the big picture, but I believe there's a larger group that think they're more important than they really are... or understand. I think the 49ers are better served paying Aiyuk what he's worth now and spread out that bonus money to dilute it as much as they could. Then, pay Deebo and Purdy next year. Both Kittle and McCaffrey will be free agents after the 2025 season. Kittle will be 32... McCaffrey 29. It's best to address them leaving now, so that you can let them walk after the 2025 saeson, and keep both Deebo & Aiyuk. The TE & RB positions are cheaper to replace than game changing WR's. It's best to keep the ones you have and go fill in the gaps with the cheaper players.

Polls. LOL There's only 1 poll that matters, and it's in November.

Those were at the federal level, done by the Feds. This is the state doing it despite the Feds saying there isn't enough to charge him on. This is 100% political. Stop making excuses for your partisan bias.

Every QB is a system QB. The reason they performed at that level to which they did, the system and the QB were a match. Sure, why not? I wouldn't, but that doesn't mean they wouldn't. Like I said, if the sentiment is that Dak is worth $60M, then Purdy has to be as well, since he's accomplished more. If a guy is good enough, while I still think it's unwise to pay someone that kind of money, it'll still work itself out. The only issues I have with QB salaries is when the QB is only so/so, and you pay him $30M when a draft pick or off-season pickup can be so/so and cost $10M.

Guy believes everything Democrats say.

Let's say that ABSOLUTELY NOTHING has changed in the last 70+ years... but, Trump ran as a Democrat in 2016 (not Hillary), and beat a Republican. Then, in 2020, a Republican beat Trump. True or false.... There would have been a total of ZERO investigations and charges against Donald Trump. Honestly, you don't have to answer. I know the answer and so do you, so let's not pretend anything.

Assuming Purdy's performance this year is relatively close to last year, he's in line for $60M AAV. A few years ago, when Dak was claiming (and others on his behalf), for $40M AAV, those numbers were around where Purdy is. Now, the sentiment is that Dak, still producing in the ballpark of those numbers, is that Dak is worth $60M. Purdy got his team to 2 NFC Championship games... 2 more than Dak (who had 8 cracks at it). If Purdy has a season where he's around 4200 to 4500 yards with 30 to 35+ TD's, he's getting $60M, not $40M.

You gotta love it when a segment of society wants to prosecute someone for the sole purpose that this person disagrees with them politically. I thought our country was supposed to be above that. Guess not.

Depends on what you mean by "the grass isn't always greener". He's gotten better every year he's been in the league even while the QB position as been somewhat chaotic during that time frame. Every GM and coach has seen this. Even if the Niners trade him to a team with a terrible QB and no supporting cast, either that team is going to pay him top 5/10 WR money, get tagged, or go to another team the following year because they paid him top 5/10 WR money. Now, he may not win where he goes, but he'll get paid. To him, that may be "greener". Besides, this is the NFL, just because you won a couple years in a row, it doesn't mean that's going to last. Both McCaffrey and Kittle, neither who've been a beacon of health, have contracts ending after the 2025 season. Assuming Aiyuk plays this season out, he's going to go into next season needing a new deal, seeing that after the 2025 season, Deebo, McCaffrey, Kittle, and Purdy are all going to need new deals along with how many other players. They're all not going to be re-signed, some are going to have to go. Not saying the Niners will suck, but being in the middle of the pack isn't necessarily "green" either.

LOL, gtfoh. My use of the phrase "paper work" was to indicate that it was a simple matter. You're the one blaming states for doing something they didn't even do yet, because your leftist outlets said they were going to do it. So fock off with your bs trying to blame the Republicans for doing something your scumbag party did and having a holier than thou attitude about it.

Oh, they indicated that they will not give any exceptions? I didn't know that!! O.M.G.!!! Wow you're a moron. LOL As for my question: "So you think it's ok for people to ignore deadlines set by states in regards to their laws?" You're response is "Yes"?

So you think it's ok for people to ignore deadlines set by states in regards to their laws?

That's the thing... they're not "doing it back", they're in fact, taking the high road. They're giving the Democrats a 4 month heads up that their date is past the states deadline. Democrats in CO ruled in court, that Trump was guilty of a crime he was never charged with and thus, required a Supreme Court ruling.