TBayXXXVII

Yes, you're the idiot.

Yup.

I would never hold such hope.

I'm hoping that everyone thinks it's going to hit somewhere near Antarctica and then at the last possible second, it changes course and hits Washington DC when all 537 federally elected officials are there. That's the only re-start we need.

If they go past the deadline, they'll do the same thing they did with Trump. I commend the states for holding to their laws and telling the holier than thou pissants accountable. The states should make the candidates or caucus to cover the costs of the legislative motions needed.

You beat me to it. I read his stupid post and commented and didn't see yours until afterwards.

This isn't the issue that Rusty (or Gutterboy... whichever), is making it out to be. The DNC has until a date in August to list Biden as their candidate. Their convention is after that date. These states are giving the DNC a heads up, nothing else. It's not like they're arbitrarily convicting Biden of a crime.

LOL, you're an idiot. In both of these cases, the states are telling the DNC multiple months in advance that their convention is past the deadline to be on the ballot. What the libtards in Colorado and Maine did, was convict Trump on a crime he was never charged with. Here, all the DNC has to do is file paperwork and there is no issue.

It won't go that far.... they'll just add him like they did with Trump a few years ago. They won't waste taxpayer money on court costs to do it.

You did when you said the government pays for it. In that scenario, she no longer has to bare the responsibility of her actions and is free to go around being a on the governments dime. Make her pay the money and be done with it. Here's the kicker... in the end, it'll end up being covered by medical insurance (though, government funded insurance should not cover it).

No kidding dumbazz! I've said Day 1, about abortion, that it doesn't belong in the government purview. It's a medical issue... it's a form of elective surgery. That's where it belongs. If a woman wants a boob job, she pays for it. If Dad is fat and wants lypo, he pays for it. It's all the same thing. For some stupid reason, this became a political football. If the degenerate wants to kill her kid, let her go to the doctor and have him kill it for her... then she can pay the bill. I'm willing to bet that if a Trump made that an EO, the only people upset would be Democrats.... of course, but overall, the country would be happy. If it were Biden (God help us if that scumbag piece of trash wins), then it'll be Republican's who are upset. It's the way our country is these days... thanks to Democrats circa 2007 with their political ideology bull crap.

Like I said, copout answer. Before ANY of that happens, mom is footing the bill for the kid. Just pay the money and kill the kid and everyone wins. Why does the degenerate have to be the only winner?

They voted on it. That was the point of my original post. The government giving the citizens the ability to actually vote on the issue is the way to go. My problem with the government is when they make a sweeping decision on their own. He was complaining that Red states didn't care what their constituents wanted, they just banned abortions. I said blue states did the same thing, just the reverse (meaning, they didn't listen to their voters, just made a sweeping decision). The way Ohio and Kansas (and now Florida), are doing it, is the right way. It's being dealt with at the state level by the states. I find it odd that your kind are upset with Donald Trump giving people rights.

Copout answer that fails. The person getting the abortion isn't getting that kid 100% funded by welfare. It's still cheaper for the degenerate to pay for killing their kid than it is to raise the kid on welfare.

I don't have problems with degenerates killing their kids... what I have a problem with is tax payer money paying for it.

I think you're misreading the tea leaves. There's a LOT of people who are against abortion, it's just that the many are living in blue states where their voices are silenced and people like you shout them down because they don't agree with you.

My bad... 20 years ago.

Yeah, always boggled my mind why they did that. LOL

Interesting... the person who believes "my body my choice", doesn't want to give people the choice whether they can choose the law to be or not. You think the state should make the choice?

A post of ignorance that didn't need posting.

Is the left just one ironic statement after the other?

That's how it should be done at the current time. The solution, however is that it should be viewed as medical procedure, and like Alcohol, tobacco, etc, the government should put an end point. Meaning, the government tells you when it's too late, but the person is free to do as they wish on their own dime, up until that point. The right wants a say in whether you can do it or not and the left wants the government to pay for all of it... plus no deadline. This will forever be in the government purview until the two sides can meet in the middle... and BOTH will refuse to do so. In the meantime, it's best if the states have control over the feds, and the people should be able to vote on the issue in the meantime. If you noticed, of the 8 states that are giving the people the right to vote, 5 are red states.

It's the result of analytics driving the sport. The computer nerds pointing out that strike outs and home runs are the be-all-end-all of baseball is pushing pitchers to throw 90 in HS and only hit HR's. From Dr. James Andrews, about UCL's and kids pitching.

You must not have watched any UConn games.

Me either, but between the radio, email (as you saw), and just generic alerts from apps on your phone, you can avoid hearing results from major sporting events.